Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:18 am
JonCCFC wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:JonCCFC wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Fooking hell scraping the bottom of the barrell for an attack on Bluebirds Unite. A throw away comment FFS. Some on here are such goody two shoes![]()
![]()
Just looking for excuses to have a go at BU as they know it's getting stronger and stronger
Is it? I completely forgot about their existence until I saw this halirious thread.
Yep
Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:36 am
Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:58 am
Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:08 am
Magners wrote:Spot on. BU are dividing Cardiff City fans.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:13 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Magners wrote:Spot on. BU are dividing Cardiff City fans.
Sorry Chief but how can that be true ? Even if you are pro red or pro blue the only person that has divided us is Vincent Tan surely. Because without the re brand there would be no split and that is the truth.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 8:45 am
Magners wrote:Spot on. BU are dividing Cardiff City fans.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:36 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Magners wrote:Spot on. BU are dividing Cardiff City fans.
Sorry Chief but how can that be true ? Even if you are pro red or pro blue the only person that has divided us is Vincent Tan surely. Because without the re brand there would be no split and that is the truth.
A certain someone who allegedly turned up to a meeting and threatened people didn't help.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 11:51 am
JonCCFC wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:JonCCFC wrote:Jules wrote:JonCCFC wrote:That's a comment from one person who the group.
You wouldn't stop supporting Cardiff City because a Cardiff fan murdered someone.
so do you think its a stupid comment?
Yes, death isn't something to joke about
YOU mentioned death, JonCCFC. I don't see it mentioned until YOU came on and ruined yet another thread with your childish antics and responses![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Of course, you will now say I'm picking on you or I'm a prick or I don't know what I'm talking about or I'm a Primary School teacher or you don't like my style of writing, etc.![]()
It couldn't possibly be that I just think you are one of the worst posters on this site or that you are so easily caught out by an increasing number of people, eh?![]()
Anything rather than considered debate, JonCCFC and that is the the domain of an ignorant young man![]()
![]()
Only just came across this, what a surprise, it's Sven.
![]()
Yes, I mentioned death as a random example. I wasn't making a joke so I don't get what your point is. How the hell am I being childish? I'm simply defending BU as others are abusing the group for the actions of one person, you really are clutching at straws and looking for any old excuse to have a go, which is truly pathetic for a man of your age.
Grow up.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:24 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:EXACTLY the kind of response I predicted from you, Speedy (that's an irony, of course)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You really ned to read your own messages back, as well as the responses you get from others and remember this:
When someone (maybe even me) says you are a childish, immature arse with no real understanding of the debates you seem intent on spoiling in an attempt to drag the so-called 'rebrand' into every thread, then you are entitled to convince yourself that it's a 'one-off' so you don't need to heed the words of one guy's personal opinion
However, when many people say the same thing to you, just maybe it's time to start listening![]()
You certainly did mention death BEFORE anyone else did and then proceeded to turn it into an issue for your own ends. That is only to be expected from you these days and I still await a response (from you to anyone) that deals directly with the issue being debated that doesn't involve (a) an indecipherable one word answer, or (b) personal profanity, or (c) anti-rebrand rhetoric, or (d) how much you hate Tan for investing £80m+ plus, putting us in The Premier League and resolving the Langston debt (how dare he, eh?), or how changing the badge but not the colour is (quote "OK") in your eyes, or (e) how EVERYONE who has an opinion that differ to yours is (again quote: "either ignorant, a prick, in denial, a non-supporter, etc.")
Shall I go on?
But of course, I forget, you are ALWAYS right and you NEVER give in
Admirable traits indeed and sometimes the confidence of youth can only be admired...but only when you have GENUINE principles or substance to back yourself up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:26 pm
Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:28 pm
Stringer Bell wrote:Gwyn is right. Nobody threatened anyone. If someone was threatened they'd have reported it to the police there and then. I haven't heard of any reports or official complaints so therefore to my knowledge in the official capacity the alleged incident did not take place.
Sat Jul 27, 2013 10:39 pm
JonCCFC wrote:Stringer Bell wrote:Gwyn is right. Nobody threatened anyone. If someone was threatened they'd have reported it to the police there and then. I haven't heard of any reports or official complaints so therefore to my knowledge in the official capacity the alleged incident did not take place.
So if it's not official, it didn't happen?
Sat Jul 27, 2013 11:16 pm
Stringer Bell wrote:JonCCFC wrote:Stringer Bell wrote:Gwyn is right. Nobody threatened anyone. If someone was threatened they'd have reported it to the police there and then. I haven't heard of any reports or official complaints so therefore to my knowledge in the official capacity the alleged incident did not take place.
So if it's not official, it didn't happen?
No. If it did I ask you in front of the jury to present evidence including time and date of the alleged offence, the participants involved including the aforementioned person who was alleged to have made said threat and also 2 or more witnesses to back up your version of events.
If you cannot do that then unfortunately it's obvious the event did not take place. Case dismissed.