Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:37 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Paxman wrote:
hirwaunbluebird wrote:So points wise which is closer!


Bottom 3, obviously.

Not sure what your point is though. The chances of Swansea finishing in the top 6-7 is far more likely than bottom 3.


That, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd statement :roll:

The fact that you are closer to the relegation places points wise makes it much more likely that you would end up there you retard :? :shock:

I personally don't think there was any likelihood of either happening this season but to try and claim that means you need your head examined :laughing5:


You dont really think things out do you? Let me explain in laymans terms. We are currently 9th. To finish in the bottom 3, 9 teams below us would have to overtake us and with the fact that most of them would be playing each other the likelihood of that happening would be very very remote. Then look above us. We would have to overtake 2 teams Liverpool, and West Brom. 1 team is 8 points above us, the other 3. We have a game in hand on them away against Wigan. Now at the time of the original post being made, We had an upcoming home game against Southampton (expected to win), Liverpool had a game against Chelsea. Highly likely they would lose. That would have put us 6 points behind them with a game in hand. Now are you really suggesting the original poster needs his head examined for saying that it's more likely we could finish 7th rather than 9 clubs all getting enough points to overtake a team that was on 41 points at the time of writing? Do you feel a tad stupid? :laughing6:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:20 pm

64JACK wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Paxman wrote:
hirwaunbluebird wrote:So points wise which is closer!


Bottom 3, obviously.

Not sure what your point is though. The chances of Swansea finishing in the top 6-7 is far more likely than bottom 3.


That, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd statement :roll:

The fact that you are closer to the relegation places points wise makes it much more likely that you would end up there you retard :? :shock:

I personally don't think there was any likelihood of either happening this season but to try and claim that means you need your head examined :laughing5:


You dont really think things out do you? Let me explain in laymans terms. We are currently 9th. To finish in the bottom 3, 9 teams below us would have to overtake us and with the fact that most of them would be playing each other the likelihood of that happening would be very very remote. Then look above us. We would have to overtake 2 teams Liverpool, and West Brom. 1 team is 8 points above us, the other 3. We have a game in hand on them away against Wigan. Now at the time of the original post being made, We had an upcoming home game against Southampton (expected to win), Liverpool had a game against Chelsea. Highly likely they would lose. That would have put us 6 points behind them with a game in hand. Now are you really suggesting the original poster needs his head examined for saying that it's more likely we could finish 7th rather than 9 clubs all getting enough points to overtake a team that was on 41 points at the time of writing? Do you feel a tad stupid? :laughing6:


You numpty :roll: The comments weren't made by way of an opinion they were made in an almost factual manner with no talk about the merits of the opponents, run in, etc :roll:

Bottom line is that you were nearer to bottom than top points wise. Simple enough :!:The number of teams below you is a stupid argument. If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you :lol:

It didn't happen but let's not have all this shit about being closer to a 6th or 7th place finish :laughing5:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:52 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
64JACK wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Paxman wrote:
hirwaunbluebird wrote:So points wise which is closer!


Bottom 3, obviously.

Not sure what your point is though. The chances of Swansea finishing in the top 6-7 is far more likely than bottom 3.


That, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd statement :roll:

The fact that you are closer to the relegation places points wise makes it much more likely that you would end up there you retard :? :shock:

I personally don't think there was any likelihood of either happening this season but to try and claim that means you need your head examined :laughing5:


You dont really think things out do you? Let me explain in laymans terms. We are currently 9th. To finish in the bottom 3, 9 teams below us would have to overtake us and with the fact that most of them would be playing each other the likelihood of that happening would be very very remote. Then look above us. We would have to overtake 2 teams Liverpool, and West Brom. 1 team is 8 points above us, the other 3. We have a game in hand on them away against Wigan. Now at the time of the original post being made, We had an upcoming home game against Southampton (expected to win), Liverpool had a game against Chelsea. Highly likely they would lose. That would have put us 6 points behind them with a game in hand. Now are you really suggesting the original poster needs his head examined for saying that it's more likely we could finish 7th rather than 9 clubs all getting enough points to overtake a team that was on 41 points at the time of writing? Do you feel a tad stupid? :laughing6:


You numpty :roll: The comments weren't made by way of an opinion they were made in an almost factual manner with no talk about the merits of the opponents, run in, etc :roll:

Bottom line is that you were nearer to bottom than top points wise. Simple enough :!:The number of teams below you is a stupid argument. If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you :lol:

It didn't happen but let's not have all this shit about being closer to a 6th or 7th place finish :laughing5:


Fair play. Your really dull aint ya! Of course they were made in a factual manner because thats the facts you stupid boy! :laughing6:

"If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you" :laughing6:

The only problem we have here is that it's quite evident that you are as thick as fuckin shit pal! :laughing6:

But hey! You made my night! :laughing6: :wave:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:33 pm

If they play Man U and Liverpool every week then yes, but they won't so a BIG NO :malky: :malky:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Mon Apr 22, 2013 11:21 pm

neathbluebird wrote:For the likes of Man utd chelsea etc yes -wigan ,norwich then no.Apart from Swansea itself -the major towns each side-Llanelli & Neath are egg towns with little or no interest in "the swans" .Of course i accept there are Swans fans in neathj &llanelli- but there are a significunt number of cardiff in neath compared to the oproximity to jacktown. If you look at the big towns surrounding Cardiff-barry,ponty & caerphily then the level of jack support there is next to nothing. my point is therefore is that the "swans" or jack bas*****s as i prefer to call them have no substantial support outside of their own TOWN & realistacaly have reached their maximum level of support at presen5t.Contrast that with cardiff (10th largest city in uk) with virtually whole of south wales supporting them has the potential to be one of the biggest teams in europe.....but that potential will only come with success on the field.My dream was always to to see Cardiff city in the premier league-but now that dream has ben forfilled then we have to look forwarsd ,there is no reason with success on the field & our massive support base that we cannot be in europes elite in the long terrm(why else would tan have invested in us-after all he`s one of the wealthiest blokes in the world

So barry ponty caerphily are hotbeds for football and big towns :lol

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:31 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:27 am

yesyes wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

They did in fact have only 12411 when they hosted Coventry that season with Ben Turner scoring the goal for Coventry City in a 2-1 win. Also there was not one total sellout with the highest attendance being 19000 against Leeds.
:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:21 am

El Tel wrote:
yesyes wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

They did in fact have only 12411 when they hosted Coventry that season with Ben Turner scoring the goal for Coventry City in a 2-1 win. Also there was not one total sellout with the highest attendance being 19000 against Leeds.
:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

That figure on wikipedia is wrong, that season every away team were given the whole north stand around 3000 tickets, only leeds filled it, so the home ends were sold out against several teams, even if the attendance at the time was only around 17000 because of the lack of away fans.

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:22 am

yesyes wrote:
El Tel wrote:
yesyes wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

They did in fact have only 12411 when they hosted Coventry that season with Ben Turner scoring the goal for Coventry City in a 2-1 win. Also there was not one total sellout with the highest attendance being 19000 against Leeds.
:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

That figure on wikipedia is wrong, that season every away team were given the whole north stand around 3000 tickets, only leeds filled it, so the home ends were sold out against several teams, even if the attendance at the time was only around 17000 because of the lack of away fans.


The only game sold out at the Lib during your promotion season was Cardiff City.

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:12 am

64JACK wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
64JACK wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Paxman wrote:
hirwaunbluebird wrote:So points wise which is closer!


Bottom 3, obviously.

Not sure what your point is though. The chances of Swansea finishing in the top 6-7 is far more likely than bottom 3.


That, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd statement :roll:

The fact that you are closer to the relegation places points wise makes it much more likely that you would end up there you retard :? :shock:

I personally don't think there was any likelihood of either happening this season but to try and claim that means you need your head examined :laughing5:


You dont really think things out do you? Let me explain in laymans terms. We are currently 9th. To finish in the bottom 3, 9 teams below us would have to overtake us and with the fact that most of them would be playing each other the likelihood of that happening would be very very remote. Then look above us. We would have to overtake 2 teams Liverpool, and West Brom. 1 team is 8 points above us, the other 3. We have a game in hand on them away against Wigan. Now at the time of the original post being made, We had an upcoming home game against Southampton (expected to win), Liverpool had a game against Chelsea. Highly likely they would lose. That would have put us 6 points behind them with a game in hand. Now are you really suggesting the original poster needs his head examined for saying that it's more likely we could finish 7th rather than 9 clubs all getting enough points to overtake a team that was on 41 points at the time of writing? Do you feel a tad stupid? :laughing6:


You numpty :roll: The comments weren't made by way of an opinion they were made in an almost factual manner with no talk about the merits of the opponents, run in, etc :roll:

Bottom line is that you were nearer to bottom than top points wise. Simple enough :!:The number of teams below you is a stupid argument. If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you :lol:

It didn't happen but let's not have all this shit about being closer to a 6th or 7th place finish :laughing5:


Fair play. Your really dull aint ya! Of course they were made in a factual manner because thats the facts you stupid boy! :laughing6:

"If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you" :laughing6:

The only problem we have here is that it's quite evident that you are as thick as fuckin shit pal! :laughing6:

But hey! You made my night! :laughing6: :wave:


And I thought rumours of intense in-breeding in Swansea were vastly exagerrated :roll: :evil:

You must be living in some parallel universe as I just cannot see the merit of your argument. Take the Jack tinted glasses off and read the posts again and maybe you will understand this time.

As for me being dull ........................... :roll:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:15 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
yesyes wrote:
El Tel wrote:
yesyes wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

They did in fact have only 12411 when they hosted Coventry that season with Ben Turner scoring the goal for Coventry City in a 2-1 win. Also there was not one total sellout with the highest attendance being 19000 against Leeds.
:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

That figure on wikipedia is wrong, that season every away team were given the whole north stand around 3000 tickets, only leeds filled it, so the home ends were sold out against several teams, even if the attendance at the time was only around 17000 because of the lack of away fans.


The only game sold out at the Lib during your promotion season was Cardiff City.

not true

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:45 pm

.
Not sure what your point is though. The chances of Swansea finishing in the top 6-7 is far more likely than bottom 3.[/quote]

That, quite frankly, is an absolutely absurd statement :roll:

The fact that you are closer to the relegation places points wise makes it much more likely that you would end up there you retard :? :shock:

I personally don't think there was any likelihood of either happening this season but to try and claim that means you need your head examined :laughing5:[/quote]

You dont really think things out do you? Let me explain in laymans terms. We are currently 9th. To finish in the bottom 3, 9 teams below us would have to overtake us and with the fact that most of them would be playing each other the likelihood of that happening would be very very remote. Then look above us. We would have to overtake 2 teams Liverpool, and West Brom. 1 team is 8 points above us, the other 3. We have a game in hand on them away against Wigan. Now at the time of the original post being made, We had an upcoming home game against Southampton (expected to win), Liverpool had a game against Chelsea. Highly likely they would lose. That would have put us 6 points behind them with a game in hand. Now are you really suggesting the original poster needs his head examined for saying that it's more likely we could finish 7th rather than 9 clubs all getting enough points to overtake a team that was on 41 points at the time of writing? Do you feel a tad stupid? :laughing6:[/quote]

You numpty :roll: The comments weren't made by way of an opinion they were made in an almost factual manner with no talk about the merits of the opponents, run in, etc :roll:

Bottom line is that you were nearer to bottom than top points wise. Simple enough :!:The number of teams below you is a stupid argument. If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you :lol:

It didn't happen but let's not have all this shit about being closer to a 6th or 7th place finish :laughing5:[/quote]

Fair play. Your really dull aint ya! Of course they were made in a factual manner because thats the facts you stupid boy! :laughing6:

"If they were all on the same number of points it would be just as easy for all 9 clubs to take over you" :laughing6:

The only problem we have here is that it's quite evident that you are as thick as fuckin shit pal! :laughing6:

But hey! You made my night! :laughing6: :wave:[/quote]

And I thought rumours of intense in-breeding in Swansea were vastly exagerrated :roll: :evil:

You must be living in some parallel universe as I just cannot see the merit of your argument. Take the Jack tinted glasses off and read the posts again and maybe you will understand this time.

As for me being dull ........................... :roll:[/quote]

:laughing6: I've read the posts and thats all I can see is you calling everyone numpties because you dont understand simple mathematics! The only arguement youve put across is name calling. Come back when your older! :laughing6: :wave:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:21 pm

waddle wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
yesyes wrote:
El Tel wrote:
yesyes wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Swansea had about 14/15k average. Only sold out once (us) and quite regularly were at 12k during the season.

Wrong the season swansea went up they had sellouts against, against qpr, norwich, forest, sheff utd, leeds and a few more. They never had a 12k attendance as you say they did, and had a average attendance of 15500 the same as cardiff had the season they got to the fa cup final. :thumbright:

They did in fact have only 12411 when they hosted Coventry that season with Ben Turner scoring the goal for Coventry City in a 2-1 win. Also there was not one total sellout with the highest attendance being 19000 against Leeds.
:laughing5: :laughing5: :laughing5:

That figure on wikipedia is wrong, that season every away team were given the whole north stand around 3000 tickets, only leeds filled it, so the home ends were sold out against several teams, even if the attendance at the time was only around 17000 because of the lack of away fans.


The only game sold out at the Lib during your promotion season was Cardiff City.

not true


Yes it is true, you Jacks are living on a different planet to rest of the country :malky: :ayatollah:

Re: Would Swansea fill their proposed 32,000 stadium?

Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:27 pm

It's not true mun !!!!!! , do you want to put a bet on it ;)


That makes no sense we're living on a different planet to the rest of the country :?