Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:29 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?




Who cares, FFS??

Unike you, WE ARE CARDIFF FANS and couldn't give a feck about the Jacks (or YOU while we are on the subject, Jack Lemmon :lol: )

You really are on here JUST to be a nuisance, aren't you?

Quite sad :cry: :oops:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:29 pm

Quick question st Mellon. I recall Blackpool being fined for fielding a substationally weakened side against Aston villa back in 2011. Do you think Swansea should be fined for fielding a 'second string' side in the premier league.

Here's the link for that Blackpool game
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 378679.stm

I believe they should be fined personally for not fielding a competitive lineup and resting certain starting eleven players

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:31 pm

Sven Ghali wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?




Who cares, FFS??

Unike you, WE ARE CARDIFF FANS and couldn't give a feck about the Jacks (or YOU while we are on the subject, Jack Lemmon :lol: )

You really are on here JUST to be a nuisance, aren't you?

Quite sad :cry: :oops:


This.

f**k off you 6 fingered fiend.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:32 pm

Bluebird_87 wrote:Quick question st Mellon. I recall Blackpool being fined for fielding a substationally weakened side against Aston villa back in 2011. Do you think Swansea should be fined for fielding a 'second string' side in the premier league.

Here's the link for that Blackpool game
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 378679.stm

I believe they should be fined personally for not fielding a competitive lineup and resting certain starting eleven players


Wolves were also fined for doing similar against united.

Personally I think it's nonsense, the manager should be able to pick whom he wishes.

But in terms if whats happened to other clubs and if there has been no verbal or legislative change to anything since then... Then yes swansea should be fined.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:35 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:
Bluebird_87 wrote:Quick question st Mellon. I recall Blackpool being fined for fielding a substationally weakened side against Aston villa back in 2011. Do you think Swansea should be fined for fielding a 'second string' side in the premier league.

Here's the link for that Blackpool game
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 378679.stm

I believe they should be fined personally for not fielding a competitive lineup and resting certain starting eleven players


Wolves were also fined for doing similar against united.

Personally I think it's nonsense, the manager should be able to pick whom he wishes.

But in terms if whats happened to other clubs and if there has been no verbal or legislative change to anything since then... Then yes swansea should be fined.


Glad you agree, the competition should be taken seriously regardless of upcoming fixtures. Bradford played a full strength side yesterday and lost. Just have to wait and see whether they are fined. I bet Bradford won't be happy mind with the lineup laudrup send out mind.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:37 pm

People please stop replying to this Troglodyte!
Just give him and his shity threads a very wide birth, and hopefullythen he'll crawl back under the rock from whence he came.

Anyway i'm pretty sure if you keep replying to him, sooner or later your going to catch cyber aids!

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:45 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:
SBF1 wrote:Postby CityGent » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:35 pm
0-0

Great prediction of his

Closer than most of the verbal diarrhoea he/she/it spouts

:laughing6: :laughing6: :laughing6:


I predicted a 2-0 defeat.

Didnt account for the 2 penalties. So not a bad guess.


Mmmm isnt penalties still a goal? so didnt lose 3-0 plus 2pens it was 5-0 simples!


Not saying any different.

I'm not sure why everyone is going Mad because I predicted they would lose 2-0 :lol:

AWwww gutted can't believe I didn't guess the exact score right. How dare I not :D


no you implied that your guess would have been close but for two pens? mmm almost as good as your grasp of investment!! :lol: :thumbup:


It was close, it was an away defeat scoring no goals.

As for my grasp of investment. Is this the thread where you were trying to convince me it was a good idea to buy something for £89 when you can buy it for £10? :lol:

You are also one of my faves. I love the way how you bumble your way into a thread, completely not understand it, say your piece, usually incoherent nonsense then realise what you've typed and then write " end of convo" and disappear as quickly as you came :D[/quote

end of conversation is when its no point in continuing as don't like going round in circles! so you wont pay £89 for some thing that is worth only £10, but which will increase value over time to £1k? mmm

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:54 pm

Which part of "you can buy it for £10" are you having issues with? :shock:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:57 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:Resting players against a prem side for a game a week away against a mid table league 2 side seems ridiculous to me. Got what they deserved.


I don't see how anyone can see that as ridiculous.

In the league the biggest realistic prize on offer is the Europa league. Swansea can secure that in one match next Sunday against league 2 opposition. Why would they concentrate on the harder most unlikely route that consists of 11 matches against premier league opposition.

If they can win next week they are as good as finished 5th in the Prem.


It's alright Mellon, you'll have a proper squad to watch up there next season.


Agreed. There's rumours of Aspas signing so him and Michu up front should be a great partnership.


Asapas maybe but I can't see Malky going after Michu.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:57 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:
Avon barksdale wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:
CityGent wrote:I'm a firm believer in Karma.

This rancid parasite deserves to be cornered by some knife wielding Ointment next week where a prolonged stabbing to the lungs won't be nearly good enough for him


:lol: that's true. Definately anyone who makes the observation that Swansea played their second string deserves to be murdered :lol:

I like you, your one of my faves on here. Do you know that :D

Hope you don't go through with your plan to kill your parents :(


I have city gent and taffy down to a tee and almost control them, but you are an unknown quantity to me. I have no idea where you are going with your posts, I'm sure ill get a handle on you soon enough.

But as if this moment I have no idea what you are talking about, just an odd response.

I also have no idea what I'm talking about 'as if this moment'

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:59 pm

[quote="Saint Mellon."]Which part of "you can buy it for £10" are you having issues with? :shock:[/quot
point was would you pay £89 for something that at present is worth only £10 but in time is worth £1k? do you understand the point???
answer that?
then I will answer your pont on £10

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:04 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon. wrote:Which part of "you can buy it for £10" are you having issues with? :shock:[/quot
point was would you pay £89 for something that at present is worth only £10 but in time is worth £1k? do you understand the point???
answer that?
then I will answer your pont on £10


Your point makes no sense.

Tan can acquire the rest of the shares fir around £15m. You are telling me he is going to over pay by £80m for no reason.

This was a shares to equity debate that you clearly cannot grasp.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:10 pm

Saint Mellon. wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon. wrote:Which part of "you can buy it for £10" are you having issues with? :shock:[/quot
point was would you pay £89 for something that at present is worth only £10 but in time is worth £1k? do you understand the point???
answer that?
then I will answer your pont on £10


Your point makes no sense.

Tan can acquire the rest of the shares fir around £15m. You are telling me he is going to over pay by £80m for no reason.

This was a shares to equity debate that you clearly cannot grasp.


what about the debt owed to sam ect ect whos paying that??
but ffs forget it cant argue with such a superior being? you always avoid answers when it suites you? so I will say conversation terminated as don't like circles byeeeeeeeeeee :wave: :thumbup:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:11 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon. wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Saint Mellon. wrote:Which part of "you can buy it for £10" are you having issues with? :shock:[/quot
point was would you pay £89 for something that at present is worth only £10 but in time is worth £1k? do you understand the point???
answer that?
then I will answer your pont on £10


Your point makes no sense.

Tan can acquire the rest of the shares fir around £15m. You are telling me he is going to over pay by £80m for no reason.

This was a shares to equity debate that you clearly cannot grasp.


what about the debt owed to sam ect ect whos paying that??
but ffs forget it cant argue with such a superior being? you always avoid answers when it suites you? so I will say conversation terminated as don't like circles byeeeeeeeeeee :wave: :thumbup:


What the hell are you talking about?! :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:19 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?


5 - 0 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:20 pm

bluespeers wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?


5 - 0 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


That's not a prediction.

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:38 pm

Saint Mellon wrote:and disappear as quickly as you came :D

Presume you know a lot about 'men coming quickly' then?

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:40 pm

Fantastic :malky:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:50 pm

Liverpools third goal was a passing masterclass. :shock:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:08 pm

Avon barksdale wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:
CityGent wrote:I'm a firm believer in Karma.

This rancid parasite deserves to be cornered by some knife wielding Ointment next week where a prolonged stabbing to the lungs won't be nearly good enough for him


:lol: that's true. Definately anyone who makes the observation that Swansea played their second string deserves to be murdered :lol:

I like you, your one of my faves on here. Do you know that :D

Hope you don't go through with your plan to kill your parents :(


Dooon't dooo iiitt!!!

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:11 pm

Saint Mellon

Is it true you've never had a girlfriend and the closest you've got to a sexual relationship is spying on your mother in the bath?

If you don't reply, that means I'm right

:laughing6:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:25 pm

CityGent wrote:Saint Mellon

Is it true you've never had a girlfriend and the closest you've got to a sexual relationship is spying on your mother in the bath?

If you don't reply, that means I'm right

:laughing6:



i think he has a 2way mirrored wardrobe between his bedroom and his mothers... just so he can watch his mum and his dad can watch him!

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:28 pm

CityGent wrote:Saint Mellon

Is it true you've never had a girlfriend and the closest you've got to a sexual relationship is spying on your mother in the bath?

If you don't reply, that means I'm right

:laughing6:


The thruth comes out! :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:15 pm

5-0 to the Scousers and so you wont see many gypos on here tonight.
:D :D :D

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:34 pm

Saint Mellon. wrote:
bluespeers wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?


5 - 0 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


That's not a prediction.




No, you are right. It's a fecking hammering!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

I still don't really give a toss but it just might keep certain 'posters' off here for a day or two ;) :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:43 pm

Sven Ghali wrote:
Saint Mellon. wrote:
bluespeers wrote:
Saint Mellon wrote:Score predictions?


5 - 0 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


That's not a prediction.




No, you are right. It's a fecking hammering!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

I still don't really give a toss but it just might keep certain 'posters' off here for a day or two ;) :lol:



i agree, i thought the prem was their bread n butter and the capital one cup just a load of mickey mouse.... :lol:

now they have to rest players for 7 days against a division 4 side!!

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:16 am

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21438902

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... paign=1490

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:42 am

swansea field a weakened side and get tonked shocker :o

at last you finally have something to take the piss about , enjoy fellas you deserve it :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:55 am

waddle wrote:swansea field a weakened side and get tonked shocker :o

at last you finally have something to take the piss about , enjoy fellas you deserve it :lol:


We are, can't you tell? :lol:

Your old pal Sherrifadz ain't up to his usual standard tho is he? Maybe he should pretend to be a Newport fan or something seeing as everyone has him sussed on here. Do they even have boards? :lol:

Re: Liverpool v Swansea

Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:59 am

waddle wrote:swansea field a weakened side and get tonked shocker :o

at last you finally have something to take the piss about , enjoy fellas you deserve it :lol:


I was very surprised, Liverpool are a very poor team.

Why you resting players for a cup no one is interested in? (According to the Swansea posters on here :lol:)