Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:51 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 1:59 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:08 pm
BigGwynram wrote:The press love him don't they, big piece again in Eggo, fined two thousand pounds plus two thousand five hundred pounds costs, apparently sending written threats to one of his tenants, I'm sure someone can put a link up.
What's that saying about people in glass houses, he was so obsessed with the alleged threats made during the red and blue nonsense and all the while he's putting his own out there and in written form as well.![]()
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:11 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:12 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:19 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:25 pm
rontom wrote:Goes under the name of angry man [and others]
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:33 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:36 pm
Angry Man wrote:Was wondering who'd be the first one to put this up.
Isn't it interesting that the labour supporting press fail to say that my property was damaged, tenants were months in arrears of their rent, failed to leave when agreed too, failed to contribute to maintenance costs then they were to blame for the issues and the list can go on.
They also fail to say that the fine was mainly down to the fact that they had to separate the civil and criminal issues for the situation. Meaning that I can now claim damages for more than what I was fined for.
However I'm sure that won't stop people thinking the worst hey
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:41 pm
SBF1 wrote:Angry Man wrote:Was wondering who'd be the first one to put this up.
Isn't it interesting that the labour supporting press fail to say that my property was damaged, tenants were months in arrears of their rent, failed to leave when agreed too, failed to contribute to maintenance costs then they were to blame for the issues and the list can go on.
They also fail to say that the fine was mainly down to the fact that they had to separate the civil and criminal issues for the situation. Meaning that I can now claim damages for more than what I was fined for.
However I'm sure that won't stop people thinking the worst hey
All that may be the case, but you can't go writing written threats. But you know that now though.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:42 pm
SBF1 wrote:Angry Man wrote:Was wondering who'd be the first one to put this up.
Isn't it interesting that the labour supporting press fail to say that my property was damaged, tenants were months in arrears of their rent, failed to leave when agreed too, failed to contribute to maintenance costs then they were to blame for the issues and the list can go on.
They also fail to say that the fine was mainly down to the fact that they had to separate the civil and criminal issues for the situation. Meaning that I can now claim damages for more than what I was fined for.
However I'm sure that won't stop people thinking the worst hey
All that may be the case, but you can't go writing written threats. But you know that now though.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:43 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:50 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:52 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Well Adam the fact you have been fined in a court of law does not look good on you. There are propers ways to go, you might not like them but that does not give you the right to make your own laws.
I'm taken it you have been fined under a criminal act. I can't see how you can claim that back under a civil one.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:54 pm
BigGwynram wrote:With all these convictions mounting up, it could help with your employment agency you must have loads of contacts INSIDE, perhaps you could help the community you love so much by putting some work the way of ex cons, it must be hard for them to get back into the workplace with convictions on their record, you could use it as a selling to, locksmiths, opening locked cars, shoplifters, whoops shopfitters I meant then, security guards (you know poacher turned gamekeeper) furniture movers, bailiffs,the list is endless.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:03 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:06 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:08 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:20 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Adam's a bit of a clown on here at times but writing a threatening letter would be the least I would have done to get these people out of my house for my folks to move in, esp if they had damaged it to.
I actually agree with him on this issue.
Good luck regarding this issue Adam.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:42 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Adam's a bit of a clown on here at times but writing a threatening letter would be the least I would have done to get these people out of my house for my folks to move in, esp if they had damaged it to.
I actually agree with him on this issue.
Good luck regarding this issue Adam.
It is the last thing I would have done. Youdon't want to give your enemy ammunition to use against you.
My experience is to send the boys around. You have to have bottle to do that but it works alot more efficient than doing the proper thing. It one of those situations where proper can let you down.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:54 pm
Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:02 pm
sleepers wrote:Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
if you offered them five different properties because you wanted to move your parents intoo there house,
why didnt you offer your parents one of the five properties they refused,common sense really
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:13 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Threatening tenants, wishing cancer on folk, mocking the dead cocklepickers.
A very unsavoury individual.
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:20 pm
sleepers wrote:Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
if you offered them five different properties because you wanted to move your parents intoo there house,
why didnt you offer your parents one of the five properties they refused,common sense really
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:25 pm
taffyapple wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Threatening tenants, wishing cancer on folk, mocking the dead cocklepickers.
A very unsavoury individual.
A cynic would say the above are all acts likely to catch the public eye. I had a passing urge to
ring the Echo after the "DIE OF CANCER" jibe. Then it dawned on me that the desperately sad
individual might have wanted exactly that. Attention.
But having said that. He's stuck to his word and has left this site for good.
Oh, hang on.![]()
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:29 pm
sleepers wrote:Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
if you offered them five different properties because you wanted to move your parents intoo there house,
why didnt you offer your parents one of the five properties they refused,common sense really
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:48 pm
jinks-rct wrote:taffyapple wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Threatening tenants, wishing cancer on folk, mocking the dead cocklepickers.
A very unsavoury individual.
A cynic would say the above are all acts likely to catch the public eye. I had a passing urge to
ring the Echo after the "DIE OF CANCER" jibe. Then it dawned on me that the desperately sad
individual might have wanted exactly that. Attention.
But having said that. He's stuck to his word and has left this site for good.
Oh, hang on.![]()
Dont forget his quote that he thinks anyone who wears the new red shirt should be beaten up
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:53 pm
taffyapple wrote:sleepers wrote:Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
if you offered them five different properties because you wanted to move your parents intoo there house,
why didnt you offer your parents one of the five properties they refused,common sense really
Very good point.
Would have saved a lot of time and mam and dad would be settled in long since now
Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:54 pm
Angry Man wrote:sleepers wrote:Angry Man wrote:May I also state that the tenants turned down five different properties yet the moment the council offered them social housing they jumped at it. Ensuring that they'd bypass through social housing ladder which has over 2, 500 people on tge waiting list.
if you offered them five different properties because you wanted to move your parents intoo there house,
why didnt you offer your parents one of the five properties they refused,common sense really
My parents are coming to their later years in life and I want to provide for their needs. Is that such a issue with you or are you oneof these people who don't care for your own parents.?