Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:07 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:14 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:17 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:19 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Dont care if he retires.
The problem with Craig Bellamy everything has got to be centred around him and then we dont play as a team like we did today.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:31 pm
Jollffe wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Dont care if he retires.
The problem with Craig Bellamy everything has got to be centred around him and then we dont play as a team like we did today.
Wouldn't like to see him retire, but I can see where you're coming from. Noone and Smith played fantastically today, and Kim wasn't even given a chance. For Bellamy to walk straight back into the starting line-up after the break - in replacement for one of those who performed excellently today - would be a poor move from Malky.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:11 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:13 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:I would give Bellamy a completely free role to go where the fook he likes. He would terrorise every team. Bring on the Bellers if he does not retire that is.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:19 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:21 pm
ninianblue wrote:think bellers might sit just behind the front 2?
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:26 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:28 pm
Porthcawl_Bluebird wrote:Bellamy will play on the right instead of Tommy Smith I should imagine. Harsh on Smith but it's a squad game this season
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:38 pm
PtB wrote:They'll all get game time as the squad is rotated.
Last season everyone moaned there was o depth or rotation, now we have room for it people are syaing players won't get in.
Never happy!!
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:46 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:47 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 7:49 pm
Jollffe wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:I would give Bellamy a completely free role to go where the fook he likes. He would terrorise every team. Bring on the Bellers if he does not retire that is.
Who in attack/midfield would you bring off?
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:12 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Dont care if he retires.
The problem with Craig Bellamy everything has got to be centred around him and then we dont play as a team like we did today.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:21 pm
Jollffe wrote:PtB wrote:They'll all get game time as the squad is rotated.
Last season everyone moaned there was o depth or rotation, now we have room for it people are syaing players won't get in.
Never happy!!
I'm more than happy. It's nice to finally see some competition.
I'm not talking about the entire season with this one (of course Bellamy is going to play a big part!), I'm just interested to see if he's allowed to walk straight back into the starting XI after some superb performances from others today.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:25 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:27 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Dont care if he retires.
The problem with Craig Bellamy everything has got to be centred around him and then we dont play as a team like we did today.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:31 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Jollffe wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:I would give Bellamy a completely free role to go where the fook he likes. He would terrorise every team. Bring on the Bellers if he does not retire that is.
Who in attack/midfield would you bring off?
It would be unfair on anyone to get dropped today. But push comes to shove Helguson, Mutch, or regretably even Smith.
........................................................Marshall..........................................................................
Kev..........................Hudson........................................Turner...................................Taylor
Bellamy.....................................Mutch............................Whitts............................Noone
................................................Maynard.................Mason
Subs Kim, Smith, Helguson, Connely,Gunnerson, Any number of our strikers.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:37 pm
BEAKERBLUE wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Jollffe wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:I would give Bellamy a completely free role to go where the fook he likes. He would terrorise every team. Bring on the Bellers if he does not retire that is.
Who in attack/midfield would you bring off?
It would be unfair on anyone to get dropped today. But push comes to shove Helguson, Mutch, or regretably even Smith.
........................................................Marshall..........................................................................
Kev..........................Hudson........................................Turner...................................Taylor
Bellamy.....................................Mutch............................Whitts............................Noone
................................................Maynard.................Mason
Subs Kim, Smith, Helguson, Connely,Gunnerson, Any number of our strikers.
what no keeper on the bench get real
Sun Sep 02, 2012 8:55 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:I reckon we will see a different Bellamy now as teams won't be able to double up on him as the main City threat. We'll have options all over the field so bellamy should get more soave and then look out
Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:11 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:25 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:36 pm
Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:02 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Dont care if he retires.
The problem with Craig Bellamy everything has got to be centred around him and then we dont play as a team like we did today.
Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:58 pm
Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:07 am
Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Porthcawl_Bluebird wrote:Bellamy will play on the right instead of Tommy Smith I should imagine. Harsh on Smith but it's a squad game this season
think you may be right
Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:41 am
Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:43 am
Nuclearblue wrote:I would give Bellamy a completely free role to go where the fook he likes. He would terrorise every team. Bring on the Bellers if he does not retire that is.