Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:43 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:51 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:59 am
dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:04 am
dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:14 am
Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
You've missed out hurling abuse and making threats and carrying out violence towards anyone that is wearing red which is pretty much your forte. That is why the club won't allow any protest on its land as it doesn't want to run the risk of violence from people like yourself at the first game of the season, when TG and VT are there and in front of the Sky Cameras. Makes pretty much good sense to me.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:48 am
dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
You've missed out hurling abuse and making threats and carrying out violence towards anyone that is wearing red which is pretty much your forte. That is why the club won't allow any protest on its land as it doesn't want to run the risk of violence from people like yourself at the first game of the season, when TG and VT are there and in front of the Sky Cameras. Makes pretty much good sense to me.
...................
Mr Natman Blue I have never threatened or abused anyone it's not my style,I ask you to show me any proof of this or I will be taking legal action for slander.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:50 am
dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
You've missed out hurling abuse and making threats and carrying out violence towards anyone that is wearing red which is pretty much your forte. That is why the club won't allow any protest on its land as it doesn't want to run the risk of violence from people like yourself at the first game of the season, when TG and VT are there and in front of the Sky Cameras. Makes pretty much good sense to me.
...................
Mr Natman Blue I have never threatened or abused anyone it's not my style,I ask you to show me any proof of this or I will be taking legal action for slander.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:52 am
Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:52 am
dazzyt wrote:So I have heard the news that protesting peacefully about something you disagree with is now not allowed in this country and We are being told we can't protest so .Just to clear a few things up at what point is a protester protesting?,I have read many on here saying their protest is wearing blue ........that will show them won't it!
So
Exactly what is deemed to be a protest?
1.Standing outside the ground shouting keep cardiff blue?
Up to them who want to do this
2.standing outside with a blue shirt on?
i would hope everyone will have blue shirts
3.standing outside with a banner saying keep cardiff blue?
Again up to them who want to do this
4.sitting in the ground with a blue shirt on?
hopefully it will be a sea of blue
5.sitting in the ground with a banner shoutingg keep cardiff blue?
Seems pointless because we can not keep it blue this season we are red thats how it is for this season alone and hopefully they will change it back if they do listen to fans as the club are saying they will over this season about the colour/joke badge, this might get out of hand and spill on to the pitch
6.sitting in the ground shouting anything to do with blue?
Lets hope its a blue army and bluebirds chant all night
7.running on the pitch naked with a blue banner shoved up your arse?
Got something planned daz![]()
8.all of the above
The answer is???????????????
If you answered 7 I would agree and they should be banned,if your answer was 1 to 6 then this country is fucked.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:54 am
Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:00 pm
Ramstein blue wrote:On what grounds could you file a legal complaint of slander? Get a grasp of basic legal knowledge and don't try to sound big knowing a little about something.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:03 pm
timdog80 wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:On what grounds could you file a legal complaint of slander? Get a grasp of basic legal knowledge and don't try to sound big knowing a little about something.
He may be able to try for "libel" action {certainly not slander though} but how he would prove his reputation had been tarnished and how it will effect his life im not so sure![]()
Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:09 pm
Natman Blue wrote:timdog80 wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:On what grounds could you file a legal complaint of slander? Get a grasp of basic legal knowledge and don't try to sound big knowing a little about something.
He may be able to try for "libel" action {certainly not slander though} but how he would prove his reputation had been tarnished and how it will effect his life im not so sure![]()
Quite what he'll do with the written evidence against it via the PMs he sent me or the countless people who saw him post things in the public forum though I'm not quite sure
Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:07 pm
Natman Blue wrote:timdog80 wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:On what grounds could you file a legal complaint of slander? Get a grasp of basic legal knowledge and don't try to sound big knowing a little about something.
He may be able to try for "libel" action {certainly not slander though} but how he would prove his reputation had been tarnished and how it will effect his life im not so sure![]()
Quite what he'll do with the written evidence against it via the PMs he sent me or the countless people who saw him post things in the public forum though I'm not quite sure
Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:49 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:31 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:37 pm
Ramstein blue wrote:Im unsure what that is to prove? Is that going towards evidence of slander? All that proves is a PM conversation with equal no starters for both of you.
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:42 pm
dazzyt wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:Im unsure what that is to prove? Is that going towards evidence of slander? All that proves is a PM conversation with equal no starters for both of you.
I am not here to prove anything to you or anyone else I am simply posting the fact that the guy couldn't be happy with debating which is why we are here but he felt he had to start pming me,I have been told he messages the mods daily asking them to ban me and to be honest I think he is a weirdo and needs to get a job.
end of
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:47 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:51 pm
Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:Im unsure what that is to prove? Is that going towards evidence of slander? All that proves is a PM conversation with equal no starters for both of you.
I am not here to prove anything to you or anyone else I am simply posting the fact that the guy couldn't be happy with debating which is why we are here but he felt he had to start pming me,I have been told he messages the mods daily asking them to ban me and to be honest I think he is a weirdo and needs to get a job.
end of
If you read it I pm'd to try and clear up the misunderstanding and wasn't sure if you would ready the thread again where i gave the explanation. You were wound up because I got your name wrong due to the predictive text on my phone. I wanted to try and sort things out to get on with each other but you just came back with that threat of "Are you looking for trouble"
I'm quite happy with debating!
Yes I have messaged the mods a few times over your appalling behaviour, twice, maybe three times but hardly daily. The threat was one and then where you were equating your 'right to protest' with the experiences of those in the second world war which was distasteful and disrespectful! Obviously they felt it was warranted as they have addressed this with you otherwise you wouldn't have known about it!
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:52 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:53 pm
dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:Ramstein blue wrote:Im unsure what that is to prove? Is that going towards evidence of slander? All that proves is a PM conversation with equal no starters for both of you.
I am not here to prove anything to you or anyone else I am simply posting the fact that the guy couldn't be happy with debating which is why we are here but he felt he had to start pming me,I have been told he messages the mods daily asking them to ban me and to be honest I think he is a weirdo and needs to get a job.
end of
If you read it I pm'd to try and clear up the misunderstanding and wasn't sure if you would ready the thread again where i gave the explanation. You were wound up because I got your name wrong due to the predictive text on my phone. I wanted to try and sort things out to get on with each other but you just came back with that threat of "Are you looking for trouble"
I'm quite happy with debating!
Yes I have messaged the mods a few times over your appalling behaviour, twice, maybe three times but hardly daily. The threat was one and then where you were equating your 'right to protest' with the experiences of those in the second world war which was distasteful and disrespectful! Obviously they felt it was warranted as they have addressed this with you otherwise you wouldn't have known about it!
Show me the proof of me threatening you or jog on
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:53 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:55 pm
paulh_85 wrote:we dont need to be posting personal messages on here.
come on guys we are supposed to be on the same side here!
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:14 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Paul, I was trying to sort things out. What he conveniently misses is the first bit of the PM I'd sent him. Unfortunately there's no reasoning;
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:15 pm
dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Paul, I was trying to sort things out. What he conveniently misses is the first bit of the PM I'd sent him. Unfortunately there's no reasoning;
I threatened him![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:18 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:26 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Paul, I was trying to sort things out. What he conveniently misses is the first bit of the PM I'd sent him. Unfortunately there's no reasoning;
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:30 pm
dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Paul, I was trying to sort things out. What he conveniently misses is the first bit of the PM I'd sent him. Unfortunately there's no reasoning;
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I Just realised you are really a Jack
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Aug 17, 2012 3:31 pm
Natman Blue wrote:dazzyt wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Paul, I was trying to sort things out. What he conveniently misses is the first bit of the PM I'd sent him. Unfortunately there's no reasoning;
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I Just realised you are really a Jack
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
sticking to form with the name calling I see. Seems my original post on this thread was on the money.