Mon Jul 25, 2011 2:20 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:32 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:05 am
streamfeeder wrote:has a goal every 2.8 games thru out his career, not bad for someone who spent long periods playing out of position and he played a full season with a terrible derby county side in the premier league, not quite as good as earnie hes got a goal every 2.2 games.
an excellant signing for the money in my opinion
Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:13 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:25 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 6:45 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:06 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:16 am
Lethal Lynex wrote:There are long periods of him playing out of position
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:18 am
bluebirdbaz wrote:did anyone look at bothroyds average before joining us, and there again chops couldnt score in a brothel before we re signed him
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:28 am
Nottage Blue wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:did anyone look at bothroyds average before joining us, and there again chops couldnt score in a brothel before we re signed him
Yeah, but Chopra reckoned he has scored everywhere he's been. If you exclude the Premiership, of course
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:31 am
nerd wrote:Nottage Blue wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:did anyone look at bothroyds average before joining us, and there again chops couldnt score in a brothel before we re signed him
Yeah, but Chopra reckoned he has scored everywhere he's been. If you exclude the Premiership, of course
Chops scored about 1 in 3 in the Prem... hardly shabby.
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:33 am
Nottage Blue wrote:He rarely played though. He couldn't cut it
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:37 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:48 am
nerd wrote:Nottage Blue wrote:He rarely played though. He couldn't cut it
Managed by Roy Keane.
Who decided to play him on the wing for the most part.
The guy still scored 1 in 3, playing out of position - and as we've seen, playing him wide, he was generally a non-factor.
I'd say that's a pretty good scoring record in the prem all things considered.
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:53 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:55 am
Vintage 63 wrote:Rangers sold him in Jan for £300K and now City buy him for £900K ....... surely for players of his age City should be paying less and not more now ??
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:03 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:12 am
Vintage 63 wrote:Rangers sold him in Jan for £300K and now City buy him for £900K ....... surely for players of his age City should be paying less and not more now ??
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:21 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:22 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:23 am
Vintage 63 wrote:Rangers sold him in Jan for £300K and now City buy him for £900K ....... surely for players of his age City should be paying less and not more now ??
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:31 am
Overthemoon wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:Rangers sold him in Jan for £300K and now City buy him for £900K ....... surely for players of his age City should be paying less and not more now ??
Rangers sold him for £400,000 in January Martyn, but they only sold him so cheaply, because there wasn't much of his contract left and because he was on high wages, which I believe they were struggling to keep paying!
If you look at the players that the top 2 Scottish clubs (Rangers & Celtic) have brought in this Summer (which isn't many), none of them have been big transfer fees and I suspect that their wages wouldn't have been very high either!
I don't think that the transfer fee we are paying Bursaspor is excessive tbh, but I'm hoping that he's not getting the £25,000 per week, which it has been reported he is going to be getting!
Yes, I suspect that with Malky's reported £20 million war chest, we may well be able to afford him, but is his higher wages going to upset some of the newer signings and will it impact on any new target deals, like Goodwillie for example, who although it has been reported has already agreed terms, may change his mind if he feels undervalued?![]()
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:40 am
nerd wrote:Nottage Blue wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:did anyone look at bothroyds average before joining us, and there again chops couldnt score in a brothel before we re signed him
Yeah, but Chopra reckoned he has scored everywhere he's been. If you exclude the Premiership, of course
Chops scored about 1 in 3 in the Prem... hardly shabby.
Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:51 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:10 am
Big Boss Man wrote:I'm shocked that fans think Miller is a poor signing.
The football IQ of a lot of Cardiff fans is piss poor.
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:12 am
polo wrote:Overthemoon wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:Rangers sold him in Jan for £300K and now City buy him for £900K ....... surely for players of his age City should be paying less and not more now ??
Rangers sold him for £400,000 in January Martyn, but they only sold him so cheaply, because there wasn't much of his contract left and because he was on high wages, which I believe they were struggling to keep paying!
If you look at the players that the top 2 Scottish clubs (Rangers & Celtic) have brought in this Summer (which isn't many), none of them have been big transfer fees and I suspect that their wages wouldn't have been very high either!
I don't think that the transfer fee we are paying Bursaspor is excessive tbh, but I'm hoping that he's not getting the £25,000 per week, which it has been reported he is going to be getting!
Yes, I suspect that with Malky's reported £20 million war chest, we may well be able to afford him, but is his higher wages going to upset some of the newer signings and will it impact on any new target deals, like Goodwillie for example, who although it has been reported has already agreed terms, may change his mind if he feels undervalued?![]()
Goodwillie should not expect to be on the same wages as someone like Kenny Miller.
He is just starting out, Kenny miller is an established international (Think he might even be captain of his country), and a proven goal scorer. As MM said, he has got better with age.
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:15 am
Overthemoon wrote:Goodwillie is also a proven goalscorer and 9 years younger than Miller!
With youth on his side, he may well turn out to be a far better player than Miller, although I agree that he shouldn't command quite the same wages as Miller atm!
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:21 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:24 am
Mon Jul 25, 2011 9:29 am
nerd wrote:Overthemoon wrote:Goodwillie is also a proven goalscorer and 9 years younger than Miller!
Who was top scorer in SPL last season despite playing half the season?With youth on his side, he may well turn out to be a far better player than Miller, although I agree that he shouldn't command quite the same wages as Miller atm!
Maybe, but it's not an either-or situation.
[quote[My concern was that although he may well have not earned the right to such high wages atm, he or his agent may decide that if Miller can get X amount of money per month, then his player should get the same amount, or at least more than we've agreed to date!