Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:21 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:24 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:26 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:39 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:45 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:09 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:10 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:14 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:14 pm
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:14 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:Concussion has strict protocols so not much we can do about that.
BBM said he can be back training in a week.
Fri Feb 13, 2026 9:17 pm
montyblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Concussion has strict protocols so not much we can do about that.
BBM said he can be back training in a week.
Understand the protocol it's the lack of action from the FA perhaps the letter to the FA should have been in braille as they seem to be blind to whats infront of them and we are without 2 strikers due to elbows used.
Fri Feb 13, 2026 10:40 pm
Sat Feb 14, 2026 10:00 pm
montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Sat Feb 14, 2026 10:46 pm
NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Mon Feb 16, 2026 11:07 am
montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 1:35 pm
NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
"Hi FA, we have footage here that's really zoomed out. Please ban the player" - Mehmet Dalman. Yeah that'll work.
We know it's naughty, and any decent footage would've shown that. A zoomed out view shows a collision, there's absolutely no way they can make an accurate decision.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 1:38 pm
montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
"Hi FA, we have footage here that's really zoomed out. Please ban the player" - Mehmet Dalman. Yeah that'll work.
We know it's naughty, and any decent footage would've shown that. A zoomed out view shows a collision, there's absolutely no way they can make an accurate decision.
Try zooming it it and you can see ,ha.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 4:35 pm
Mon Feb 16, 2026 4:51 pm
montyblue wrote:I sent the video evidence to a paramedic friend of mine at derby he said that would be a section 18 /20 charged with assault, and the guy would be doing community stuff in a orange suit it should be persued.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 4:58 pm
Welshman in CA wrote:montyblue wrote:I sent the video evidence to a paramedic friend of mine at derby he said that would be a section 18 /20 charged with assault, and the guy would be doing community stuff in a orange suit it should be persued.
Pursued by who though & to where? While I get that it was a blatant act & that the FA should have done something they've said no action will be taken & that's the end of it as far as they're concerned. Yes it's ridiculous that they've said that & that they're just burying their heads in the sand & they're okay with assault but where do you honestly think the club could go with this? I just don't see where they could go now.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 5:00 pm
montyblue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:montyblue wrote:I sent the video evidence to a paramedic friend of mine at derby he said that would be a section 18 /20 charged with assault, and the guy would be doing community stuff in a orange suit it should be persued.
Pursued by who though & to where? While I get that it was a blatant act & that the FA should have done something they've said no action will be taken & that's the end of it as far as they're concerned. Yes it's ridiculous that they've said that & that they're just burying their heads in the sand & they're okay with assault but where do you honestly think the club could go with this? I just don't see where they could go now.
Our club could kick up a fuss not just bbm ,
or a private prosecution dean Saunders did that years ago
recently there was an amateur game in north Wales a lad did the same and is now in the hands of the police.
My mates a x cop and he said hands down he would win the case with that evidence,
plus he the lad in question had previous history of a similar at barnsley. The video can be enlarged when running.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 6:19 pm
Wouldn't be surprised if they were to give Isaak a 3 game match ban for damaging the Rotherham players elbow.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 6:22 pm
BLUE54 wrote:And also helped to get the "watergate" game abandoned.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 6:23 pm
montyblue wrote:BLUE54 wrote:And also helped to get the "watergate" game abandoned.
More reason this should be pursued in my book by the club,
i have x cop and para medic who have said it would be nailed on for issac if this is brought to the attention of the police making Howard Webb and the FA Look pretty stupid for dismissing this so easily.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 6:35 pm
Mon Feb 16, 2026 7:59 pm
montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
"Hi FA, we have footage here that's really zoomed out. Please ban the player" - Mehmet Dalman. Yeah that'll work.
We know it's naughty, and any decent footage would've shown that. A zoomed out view shows a collision, there's absolutely no way they can make an accurate decision.
Try zooming it it and you can see ,ha.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 8:48 pm
NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
"Hi FA, we have footage here that's really zoomed out. Please ban the player" - Mehmet Dalman. Yeah that'll work.
We know it's naughty, and any decent footage would've shown that. A zoomed out view shows a collision, there's absolutely no way they can make an accurate decision.
Try zooming it it and you can see ,ha.
See a collision, not clear and obvious if it's an elbow.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 8:51 pm
montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:montyblue wrote:Yes 2 of our strikers taken out by elbows and not even a yellow card by either F.cking shocking were our board stand up for your club.
Boards fault...![]()
![]()
Not fault but back up the manager lets hear or board putting up some argument towards the FA.
"Hi FA, we have footage here that's really zoomed out. Please ban the player" - Mehmet Dalman. Yeah that'll work.
We know it's naughty, and any decent footage would've shown that. A zoomed out view shows a collision, there's absolutely no way they can make an accurate decision.
Try zooming it it and you can see ,ha.
See a collision, not clear and obvious if it's an elbow.
I have sent it to a paramedic medic and x cop both said deliberate elbow the rotherham lad makes a stance issac s not looking ,
and issacs father is fuming that the club have not taken it further as I would if it was my son
Mon Feb 16, 2026 8:55 pm
montyblue wrote:montyblue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:montyblue wrote:I sent the video evidence to a paramedic friend of mine at derby he said that would be a section 18 /20 charged with assault, and the guy would be doing community stuff in a orange suit it should be persued.
Pursued by who though & to where? While I get that it was a blatant act & that the FA should have done something they've said no action will be taken & that's the end of it as far as they're concerned. Yes it's ridiculous that they've said that & that they're just burying their heads in the sand & they're okay with assault but where do you honestly think the club could go with this? I just don't see where they could go now.
Our club could kick up a fuss not just bbm ,
or a private prosecution dean Saunders did that years ago
recently there was an amateur game in north Wales a lad did the same and is now in the hands of the police.
My mates a x cop and he said hands down he would win the case with that evidence,
plus he the lad in question had previous history of a similar at barnsley. The video can be enlarged when running.
Plus Howard Webb x pro ref reviews for FA and is a lifetime fan of rotherham.
Smell a rat.
Mon Feb 16, 2026 9:03 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:montyblue wrote:montyblue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:montyblue wrote:I sent the video evidence to a paramedic friend of mine at derby he said that would be a section 18 /20 charged with assault, and the guy would be doing community stuff in a orange suit it should be persued.
Pursued by who though & to where? While I get that it was a blatant act & that the FA should have done something they've said no action will be taken & that's the end of it as far as they're concerned. Yes it's ridiculous that they've said that & that they're just burying their heads in the sand & they're okay with assault but where do you honestly think the club could go with this? I just don't see where they could go now.
Our club could kick up a fuss not just bbm ,
or a private prosecution dean Saunders did that years ago
recently there was an amateur game in north Wales a lad did the same and is now in the hands of the police.
My mates a x cop and he said hands down he would win the case with that evidence,
plus he the lad in question had previous history of a similar at barnsley. The video can be enlarged when running.
Plus Howard Webb x pro ref reviews for FA and is a lifetime fan of rotherham.
Smell a rat.
I forgot about that, thanks for reminding me Monty.
Howard Webb is head of the referees association (PGMOL) and, as you said, a Rotherham fan.
He also interfered with Watergate.
Doesn't feel like fairness is being applied.