Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:19 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:47 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 6:53 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:31 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:36 pm
Bigmarkw wrote:Can’t argue with that he’s still backing us doesn’t want to sell by the sound of things. Big thumbs up from me until someone better comes along.
Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:38 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 7:39 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:27 pm
Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:36 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:48 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:49 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
Fri Nov 11, 2022 7:53 am
wez1927 wrote:Bigmarkw wrote:Can’t argue with that he’s still backing us doesn’t want to sell by the sound of things. Big thumbs up from me until someone better comes along.
Agree but I do think he needs to dip in his pocket for a couple of young hungry players .
Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:53 am
wez1927 wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
It's black and white in the accounts no dividends payments in 12 years ,10s of millions written off and 10s of millions debt to equity .
Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:35 am
Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:58 am
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Fri Nov 11, 2022 1:05 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
Fri Nov 11, 2022 1:22 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
Fri Nov 11, 2022 2:47 pm
Fri Nov 11, 2022 3:07 pm
Bluebina wrote:If he wants to recoup any of his money, he needs to get a football man on the board, and take his advice, getting a club to the premier league and selling at the top price is a specialist job, and can't be done by a retail investor with no knowledge of football.
it can be done, he just needs an experienced expert that's done it before with clubs that were struggling.
Fri Nov 11, 2022 3:50 pm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:51 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Tan has lost every case accept v Isaacs.
As to all the lawyers fees and costs etc they don’t on accounts get individualised for the public, I should know as I have companies.
The public only see summaries not individuals only the Tax man see’s it all.
Sat Nov 12, 2022 7:45 am
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Tan has lost every case accept v Isaacs.
As to all the lawyers fees and costs etc they don’t on accounts get individualised for the public, I should know as I have companies.
The public only see summaries not individuals only the Tax man see’s it all.
I’m not sure they have lost every case except Isaacs, but even if they have it doesn’t mean it wasn’t worth taking the case.
Now I don’t know the figures involved but I know Sam didn’t get the full amount he was asking for. If Tan hadn’t contested it it would have cost him a whole lot more, even allowing for legal costs.
Name the cases where Tan has had to pay out the original sum he was sued for ?
Litigation is pretty much par for the course in big business for this very reason. Just a form of negotiation.
Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:34 am
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Tan has lost every case accept v Isaacs.
As to all the lawyers fees and costs etc they don’t on accounts get individualised for the public, I should know as I have companies.
The public only see summaries not individuals only the Tax man see’s it all.
I’m not sure they have lost every case except Isaacs, but even if they have it doesn’t mean it wasn’t worth taking the case.
Now I don’t know the figures involved but I know Sam didn’t get the full amount he was asking for. If Tan hadn’t contested it it would have cost him a whole lot more, even allowing for legal costs.
Name the cases where Tan has had to pay out the original sum he was sued for ?
Litigation is pretty much par for the course in big business for this very reason. Just a form of negotiation.
They have lost all the other cases.
As to Sam, thanks to Tan being an idiot, Sam got all the money he asked for and interest , plus a £2mill noun when we got promoted to the Premier.
Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:22 am
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Tan has lost every case accept v Isaacs.
As to all the lawyers fees and costs etc they don’t on accounts get individualised for the public, I should know as I have companies.
The public only see summaries not individuals only the Tax man see’s it all.
I’m not sure they have lost every case except Isaacs, but even if they have it doesn’t mean it wasn’t worth taking the case.
Now I don’t know the figures involved but I know Sam didn’t get the full amount he was asking for. If Tan hadn’t contested it it would have cost him a whole lot more, even allowing for legal costs.
Name the cases where Tan has had to pay out the original sum he was sued for ?
Litigation is pretty much par for the course in big business for this very reason. Just a form of negotiation.
They have lost all the other cases.
As to Sam, thanks to Tan being an idiot, Sam got all the money he asked for and interest , plus a £2mill noun when we got promoted to the Premier.
Sam got around 25 million in total not the 60illion originally asked so tan won that one
Sat Nov 12, 2022 12:04 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:So he's put 200million in and had nothing back. Hard to believe
![]()
He wasted that himself.
He’s forgotten to tell you what happened to all the Premier money he has also wasted.
Absolutely shocking management from the top, oops Tan is the top
But you know as well as anyone that when you get to the Prem you have to pay Prem wages. Luckily a lot of ours were on contracts that paid that level just whilst we were up there.
There won’t have been many on less than £20-25k per week and some were on more.
£20k per week is close to a million a year. Multiply that by a squad of 25 and that nearly a quarter of the Prem money.
People only ever look at fees paid for players but that pales into insignificance compared to the wage and signing in fee bill those signings generate.
Have you all forgotten the despicable rebrand, the amount of court cases and pay off of managers etc and 6 CEO’S these have cost us £mills upon £mills.
Tan has signed everything of and been a shambles in timing the business side of our club.
No one can deny that.
This millions you say cost the club in legal fees ,I can't find it anywhere in the accounts has tan paid this out of his own pocket ?
Tan has lost every case accept v Isaacs.
As to all the lawyers fees and costs etc they don’t on accounts get individualised for the public, I should know as I have companies.
The public only see summaries not individuals only the Tax man see’s it all.
I’m not sure they have lost every case except Isaacs, but even if they have it doesn’t mean it wasn’t worth taking the case.
Now I don’t know the figures involved but I know Sam didn’t get the full amount he was asking for. If Tan hadn’t contested it it would have cost him a whole lot more, even allowing for legal costs.
Name the cases where Tan has had to pay out the original sum he was sued for ?
Litigation is pretty much par for the course in big business for this very reason. Just a form of negotiation.
They have lost all the other cases.
As to Sam, thanks to Tan being an idiot, Sam got all the money he asked for and interest , plus a £2mill noun when we got promoted to the Premier.
Sam got around 25 million in total not the 60illion originally asked so tan won that one
Sam only ever asked for £28mill including interest and got £30 mill .
Because Tan kept refusing to pay what he personally signed for.
You read to much media bullshit.
Sat Nov 12, 2022 2:47 pm
Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:00 pm
Forever Blue wrote:
Sam got all the money he asked for and interest , plus a £2mill noun when we got promoted to the Premier.
Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:02 pm
ealing_ayatollah wrote:Forever Blue wrote:
Sam got all the money he asked for and interest , plus a £2mill noun when we got promoted to the Premier.
We can just thank our lucky stars it was only a noun and not a verb.
God knows how much Sam would have got for a doing word.
![]()
Sat Nov 12, 2022 5:11 pm
Sat Nov 12, 2022 7:44 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Tan has a plan, joke of the year Wez.
Wez, please open your eyes, league tables dont lie