Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:05 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:17 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:29 am
CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Fri Jan 21, 2022 7:33 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 7:48 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:01 am
Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:11 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:22 am
maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:54 am
maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 8:58 am
Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:02 am
Igovernor wrote:Left wingback and striker
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:31 am
Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:32 am
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Derby, Reading, Bristol, Birmingham fans would give their right arm to be so badly run as us !!!!!!
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:32 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Igovernor wrote:Left wingback and striker
Peterborough striker?
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:41 am
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Derby, Reading, Bristol, Birmingham fans would give their right arm to be so badly run as us !!!!!!
Fri Jan 21, 2022 9:47 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:24 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:31 am
Abergavenny wrote:I can ever remember us being well run or not operating on a loss in my time watching city I am not a great fan of Tan or do i have a great dislike of him But he has delivered 2 seasons in the top division that i thought i would never see in my time When Kavanagh was sold any little hope i thought we had disappeared
So yes it is not perfect and yes this is a tough season for us and not great at the moment Has city ever been different
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:42 am
maccydee wrote:Abergavenny wrote:I can ever remember us being well run or not operating on a loss in my time watching city I am not a great fan of Tan or do i have a great dislike of him But he has delivered 2 seasons in the top division that i thought i would never see in my time When Kavanagh was sold any little hope i thought we had disappeared
So yes it is not perfect and yes this is a tough season for us and not great at the moment Has city ever been different
I’m becoming less of a Tan fan the more silence that comes from him. If he said why we are cutting then fans would know why and could understand it. I believe it’s for FFP reasons but he hasn’t said that so it’s a guess.
On the contrary the article I posted above, Sam clearly says I overspent, I have to sell Kav or we will be in administration. We don’t have the money to be a solvent club as things stand. He also said it hurts him greatly which I believe and that he wanted the fans to come together for the club.
That weekend I was meant to be duty at RAF Valley. I begged a colleague to cover my Saturday for me, I drove down Saturday morning to go to the sheff utd game and drove back that night. Honesty made me do that. I truly felt I was doing my bit.
That’s the difference between Sam and Tan really.
With Sam it was us, with Tan/Dalman it’s you.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:45 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:maccydee wrote:Abergavenny wrote:I can ever remember us being well run or not operating on a loss in my time watching city I am not a great fan of Tan or do i have a great dislike of him But he has delivered 2 seasons in the top division that i thought i would never see in my time When Kavanagh was sold any little hope i thought we had disappeared
So yes it is not perfect and yes this is a tough season for us and not great at the moment Has city ever been different
I’m becoming less of a Tan fan the more silence that comes from him. If he said why we are cutting then fans would know why and could understand it. I believe it’s for FFP reasons but he hasn’t said that so it’s a guess.
On the contrary the article I posted above, Sam clearly says I overspent, I have to sell Kav or we will be in administration. We don’t have the money to be a solvent club as things stand. He also said it hurts him greatly which I believe and that he wanted the fans to come together for the club.
That weekend I was meant to be duty at RAF Valley. I begged a colleague to cover my Saturday for me, I drove down Saturday morning to go to the sheff utd game and drove back that night. Honesty made me do that. I truly felt I was doing my bit.
That’s the difference between Sam and Tan really.
With Sam it was us, with Tan/Dalman it’s you.
First 2 lines, totally agree.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:47 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 10:54 am
Blue78 wrote:At the start of this window is ‘absolutely certain’ that we wouldn’t bring any players in - even last week we don’t have the money to bring Doyle in.
We have 1 first team player out as his club called him back (but we might get him back) and two players in who will go straight into the first team. Both appear to be promising and addressing issues in the first team that needed addressing.
Given the expectation at the start of the month was so low, hard to see why there wouldn’t be anything other than positivity for what has been done so far.
Will say it again though - plenty of money has been spent over the years and of course some has been spent badly but we have been in a global pandemic for the last two years and 95% of clubs are cutting their cloth accordingly. Those that haven’t are going to feel it if they haven’t already.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:11 am
maccydee wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:maccydee wrote:Abergavenny wrote:I can ever remember us being well run or not operating on a loss in my time watching city I am not a great fan of Tan or do i have a great dislike of him But he has delivered 2 seasons in the top division that i thought i would never see in my time When Kavanagh was sold any little hope i thought we had disappeared
So yes it is not perfect and yes this is a tough season for us and not great at the moment Has city ever been different
I’m becoming less of a Tan fan the more silence that comes from him. If he said why we are cutting then fans would know why and could understand it. I believe it’s for FFP reasons but he hasn’t said that so it’s a guess.
On the contrary the article I posted above, Sam clearly says I overspent, I have to sell Kav or we will be in administration. We don’t have the money to be a solvent club as things stand. He also said it hurts him greatly which I believe and that he wanted the fans to come together for the club.
That weekend I was meant to be duty at RAF Valley. I begged a colleague to cover my Saturday for me, I drove down Saturday morning to go to the sheff utd game and drove back that night. Honesty made me do that. I truly felt I was doing my bit.
That’s the difference between Sam and Tan really.
With Sam it was us, with Tan/Dalman it’s you.
First 2 lines, totally agree.
Not the rest?
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:15 am
bluesince62 wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Derby, Reading, Bristol, Birmingham fans would give their right arm to be so badly run as us !!!!!!
Include stoke, and imho a couple more by seasons end, and you are right, for some though it doesn't matter, we should just splash the cash, and even if we signed gareth bale & ramsey it would not be good enough.
Whenever we sign a player, instead of being happy, they take the opportunity to have a pop at tan, 12 yrs, no ambition,too many youngsters in the squad, and the usual rhetorical remarks about the "committee" roll out.
Instead of being happy, that even though we werent signing ANY new players, we are, they use the opportunity to have the usual pop at tan?? I feel for him tbh, he cant do right for doing wrong, and sadly, until he eventually leaves, this will continue for some! We could do the treble under tan, but it still wouldnt appease some.
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:35 am
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:40 am
Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:43 am
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Stadium fully paid for ,all debt owed to our owner not to some mysterious company ,1st class facilities all over South wales ,most successful period in our history in the last 12 years ,things are so bad ay
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:53 am
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Stadium fully paid for ,all debt owed to our owner not to some mysterious company ,1st class facilities all over South wales ,most successful period in our history in the last 12 years ,things are so bad ay
Stadium was already fully paid for.
We shall see how this debt ends.
Lets wait for these facilities.
12 years of waiting for youngsters to come through and they threw 10 in and look where we are in the league.
Success followed by 2 relegations.
Previously we had two promotions from the Dungeon league and NO relegations & NO Despicable Rebrand.
AS STEVE MORISON STATED THE TABLE DOES NOT LIE / PLUS EVEN MORISON IS NOT PLAYING HARDLY ANY OF TANS KIDS HE HAS DEMANDED US TO PLAY EVEN IF NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
AND WHERE ARE WE TODAY????
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:57 am
Abergavenny wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Stadium fully paid for ,all debt owed to our owner not to some mysterious company ,1st class facilities all over South wales ,most successful period in our history in the last 12 years ,things are so bad ay
Stadium was already fully paid for.
We shall see how this debt ends.
Lets wait for these facilities.
12 years of waiting for youngsters to come through and they threw 10 in and look where we are in the league.
Success followed by 2 relegations.
Previously we had two promotions from the Dungeon league and NO relegations & NO Despicable Rebrand.
AS STEVE MORISON STATED THE TABLE DOES NOT LIE / PLUS EVEN MORISON IS NOT PLAYING HARDLY ANY OF TANS KIDS HE HAS DEMANDED US TO PLAY EVEN IF NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
AND WHERE ARE WE TODAY????
I can guarantee the stadium was not totally paid for Having family who’s company were part of the building the stadium they were not finally paid for there, work which went into many millions until around 2012. That is fact the company was offered free box to help towards the payment as well
Fri Jan 21, 2022 11:59 am
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Sven wrote:CF11 Rondo wrote:Are these the same 2 you said we signed in summer?
Wait and see; but the source on this report is reliable in that City are closing in and expect (more than hope) at least two deals to be completed in the coming days..
What you don't seem to appreciate from the summer is that the (so called) Committee pulled the plug on more than one agreed deal but, to be fair, none had been 'signed' at point of collapse (that would be breach of contract)
Still don’t understand the so called bit before committee some put. Always found that strange.
I don’t think even Barclay can have a pop at the way this window will have gone if we do get a couple more in. To think it was said we wouldn’t sign anyone, even on loan.
Neil,
We get rid of some loans before we bring in new loans , we are so skint it’s unbelievable and that’s because of 12 years of bad management from the top.
In high debt, squad virtually worthless and in serious trouble near the bottom of the Championship and one of our worst home runs for 30 years and a record breaking run of defeats under Tan in over 120 years and Neil thinks we are run well![]()
Stadium fully paid for ,all debt owed to our owner not to some mysterious company ,1st class facilities all over South wales ,most successful period in our history in the last 12 years ,things are so bad ay
Stadium was already fully paid for.
We shall see how this debt ends.
Lets wait for these facilities.
12 years of waiting for youngsters to come through and they threw 10 in and look where we are in the league.
Success followed by 2 relegations.
Previously we had two promotions from the Dungeon league and NO relegations & NO Despicable Rebrand.
AS STEVE MORISON STATED THE TABLE DOES NOT LIE / PLUS EVEN MORISON IS NOT PLAYING HARDLY ANY OF TANS KIDS HE HAS DEMANDED US TO PLAY EVEN IF NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
AND WHERE ARE WE TODAY????