Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:45 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:51 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:56 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:56 pm
wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:56 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:59 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:43 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:46 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 2:47 pm
CHRIS PIKE wrote:He also looked slow and unfit
Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:01 pm
lambert will become much more effective if the midfield offer support and run ahead of him from time to time
Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:09 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:48 pm
Dessy1927 wrote:Also think Lambert needs a paceystriker playing off him ( he was looking to lay the ball off numerous occasions but he was isolated, no one giving support.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:53 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:56 pm
Dessy1927 wrote:Also think Lambert needs a paceystriker playing off him ( he was looking to lay the ball off numerous occasions but he was isolated, no one giving support.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:08 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:08 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:09 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:13 pm
Bobbank59 wrote:I thought Noone was very poor again today. He tries to cut inside every time and never gets to the bye line to cross the ball. I was amazed he was not substituted. I don't think he, along with Ralls and Gunnar, should start next game.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:14 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:To me he played like a 35 year old who used to be good.
He's still half decent but he's certainly not the saviour who's going to score 20 goals like many on here thought he was. The one chance he had when he was put through, it looked like he was running through soft sand and fluffed his chance.
A younger, quicker, sharper player was what was needed. Saying that, he's better than what we had I suppose.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:16 pm
Bobbank59 wrote:I thought Noone was very poor again today. He tries to cut inside every time and never gets to the bye line to cross the ball. I was amazed he was not substituted. I don't think he, along with Ralls and Gunnar, should start next game.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:30 pm
Norman146 wrote:Bobbank59 wrote:I thought Noone was very poor again today. He tries to cut inside every time and never gets to the bye line to cross the ball. I was amazed he was not substituted. I don't think he, along with Ralls and Gunnar, should start next game.
Why does he constantly play him on the right when he has to cut inside. When he brought Harris on who is right footed he plays him on the left so he has to cut back inside to cross too. Both players then cant hit byline which is where lambert would want his crosses. Its just bizarre. everyone knows what noone is going to do..
Sat Sep 17, 2016 5:38 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 6:50 pm
Chris Holmes wrote:Maybe worth trying Harris up with Lambert and Pilks behind them
Sat Sep 17, 2016 6:53 pm
Stringfellow wrote:Bobbank59 wrote:I thought Noone was very poor again today. He tries to cut inside every time and never gets to the bye line to cross the ball. I was amazed he was not substituted. I don't think he, along with Ralls and Gunnar, should start next game.
Agree. Awful
Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:37 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:41 pm
wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
Sat Sep 17, 2016 7:50 pm
davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:30 pm
RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:43 pm
epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:49 pm
epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.