Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:42 pm

A lot of mixed emotions with Sam hamman in the city end today, hugs from some insults from others what's your take ?

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:03 pm

shouldnt have been anywhere near the club in my opinion. i know a few will disagree
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:04 pm

Double G wrote:shouldnt have been anywhere near the club in my opinion. i know a few will disagree

I agree with you mate ,lied and gambled with the very existence of our club

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:09 pm

Is Carl wearing Kickers ?

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:17 pm

I was surprised to see him.

It's like bringing divorce proceedings against your wife then, when the divorce is over, turning up uninvited to the reception when she remarries!

don't condone the actions of those who were having a go at him at the end of the day but i can certainly understand where they were coming from.

After the way he treated the club he surely can't have expected everyone to want a handshake and a selfie.

Didn't see Choo and Dalman coming round for a chat with him either.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:18 pm

Tickled me kickers

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:24 pm

Suppose he has the money now to fly in when he wants.

Lets be honest he started it all, without him we would still be struggling in the lower leagues most likely. He could have been a legend but I struggle to believe a truth has ever come from his mouth. His debt leave with him? he isn't Langston? he cares more about money than our club but we cant blame him for that I guess.

He talked the talk and had most people fooled.

I guess where as Tan talks most rubbish but has actually invested in the club.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:25 pm

DEANO wrote:Tickled me kickers


:lol:

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:34 pm

One thing you can't deny is he has the most incredible eyebrows I've ever seen
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:39 pm

bobbankbandit wrote:One thing you can't deny is he has the most incredible eyebrows I've ever seen


You'd have thought with all that money burning a hole in his pocket he'd be able to afford a pair of clippers.

Or maybe he could have issued a loan note to Langston for a pair.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:49 pm

davids wrote:
bobbankbandit wrote:One thing you can't deny is he has the most incredible eyebrows I've ever seen


You'd have thought with all that money burning a hole in his pocket he'd be able to afford a pair of clippers.

Or maybe he could have issued a loan note to Langston for a pair.

That's where he stashes all his money. :evil1:

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:57 pm

bobbankbandit wrote:One thing you can't deny is he has the most incredible eyebrows I've ever seen


Clearly you didn't see Len Ashurst's then.....

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:58 pm

Xcasual wrote:
DEANO wrote:Tickled me kickers


:lol:


Thank christ for that. My eyesight ain't what it was - I thought you said 'knickers'.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:16 pm

If you don't like him, ignore him. I did.

Throwing insults and berating an old man at the football is a nonsense, he may have fucked over the club but you can't change history and we are no longer tied to him anymore. As far as i;m concerned he can come and watch us whenever he wants and shouldn't be abused for it. I don't like him by the way but I also don't like bullies who throw insults at the elderly.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:18 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:If you don't like him, ignore him. I did.

Throwing insults and berating an old man at the football is a nonsense, he may have fucked over the club but you can't change history and we are no longer tied to him anymore. As far as i;m concerned he can come and watch us whenever he wants and shouldn't be abused for it. I don't like him by the way but I also don't like bullies who throw insults at the elderly.

Seconded. :thumbup:

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:26 pm

Some don't like him, fair enough. But they've got to remember and respect that there are a lot of people around who do like him. He should be able to go to a football match without having abuse being thrown at him.

He clearly loves football, I would bet anything that Tan won't come and watch us when he's not our owner anymore.

We all have different opinions.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:42 pm

worcester_ccfc wrote:Some don't like him, fair enough. But they've got to remember and respect that there are a lot of people around who do like him. He should be able to go to a football match without having abuse being thrown at him.

He clearly loves football, I would bet anything that Tan won't come and watch us when he's not our owner anymore.

We all have different opinions.


No doubt Tan won't.
But I'd bet Tan will leave us financially sound, where as Sam did anything and everything in his power to get every penny he could from us.

People forget what Langston put us through and the costs it brought to our club before Tan when we were struggling.
I'd trust Tan to do best by out club over Sam anyday.

Re: Sam today

Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:28 pm

2blue2handle wrote:
worcester_ccfc wrote:Some don't like him, fair enough. But they've got to remember and respect that there are a lot of people around who do like him. He should be able to go to a football match without having abuse being thrown at him.

He clearly loves football, I would bet anything that Tan won't come and watch us when he's not our owner anymore.

We all have different opinions.


No doubt Tan won't.
But I'd bet Tan will leave us financially sound, where as Sam did anything and everything in his power to get every penny he could from us.

People forget what Langston put us through and the costs it brought to our club before Tan when we were struggling.
I'd trust Tan to do best by out club over Sam anyday.

Agree

Re: Sam today

Sun Mar 20, 2016 1:31 am

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:If you don't like him, ignore him. I did.

Throwing insults and berating an old man at the football is a nonsense, he may have fucked over the club but you can't change history and we are no longer tied to him anymore. As far as i;m concerned he can come and watch us whenever he wants and shouldn't be abused for it. I don't like him by the way but I also don't like bullies who throw insults at the elderly.




Agree! :thumbup: :ayatollah:

Re: Sam today

Sun Mar 20, 2016 12:18 pm

I didn't see him there myself but I wouldn't have had nothing to say to him if I did.

Re: Sam today

Sun Mar 20, 2016 1:08 pm

What sort of abuse did he get? Was it just the odd few digs or was it really threatening?

Re: Sam today

Sun Mar 20, 2016 7:06 pm

Can't understand why he comes to games after what he has done

His refusal to come clean and confirm he was Langston shows he has no respect for our club

And did he have special seats today away from the real fans?

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:09 am

bluebirdoct1962 wrote:What sort of abuse did he get? Was it just the odd few digs or was it really threatening?




There was talk of some comments being made, but all I saw was a few people shaking his hand and others (from afar) pointing in his general direction asking "Is that Sam Hammam?" but no major abuse or over lauding of the man to my knowledge and he appeared to be left to watch the game in relative peace (hot drink in hand) :thumbup:

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:31 am

I say. Ask Sam to donate some of his Langstone cash to cardiff charity, simplest. Forgiveness is not hard when others are struggling on a day to day level guys.

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 7:33 am

Sven wrote:
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:What sort of abuse did he get? Was it just the odd few digs or was it really threatening?




there was talk of some comments being made, but all I saw was a few people shaking his hand and others (from afar) pointing in his general direction asking "Is that Sam Hammam?" but no major abuse or over lauding of the man to my knowledge and he appeared to be left to watch the game in relative peace (hot drink in hand) :thumbup:


That sounds much more accurate :thumbup: Sam can handle a few digs anyway. Successful people are not made out of glass

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 11:41 am

ThomasC wrote:
Sven wrote:
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:What sort of abuse did he get? Was it just the odd few digs or was it really threatening?




there was talk of some comments being made, but all I saw was a few people shaking his hand and others (from afar) pointing in his general direction asking "Is that Sam Hammam?" but no major abuse or over lauding of the man to my knowledge and he appeared to be left to watch the game in relative peace (hot drink in hand) :thumbup:


That sounds much more accurate :thumbup: Sam can handle a few digs anyway. Successful people are not made out of glass




You're right, ThomasC :thumbup:

Sam (and members of his family, who sat quietly further up the stand not too far from where I was) appeared happy just to be there and didn't visibly look to be trying to milk his presence :ayatollah:

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 12:13 pm

It is always easy to point to specific circumstances and apportion blame.

However, the way I look it is this. If we take as given the club will be debt free in 2021 then we can judge the period 2000-2021 as a complete success. In 2000 Sam Hammam turned up at CCFC as we got used to life again in the Fourth Division. His stated plan was to build a new stadium and make the club debt free.

By 2021 that will have been achieved. Of course others have contributed and the Lion's share has come from Vincent Tan.

That's why unlike 99% of other fans I admire both Sam Hammam and Vincent Tan because without either the new stadium project and the long term outlook would-not be bright. Both men are out of pocket (Sam received no return on his £24m over a 12 year period) and VT is highly unlikely to ever see the most of his again.

If there were pantomime villains during that period then it was Peter Ridsdale/PMG. Both took cost the club a substantial amount of money and despite their self-proclaimed boasts their involvement in the stadium project was both peripheral and costly.

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 2:51 pm

Tony Blue Williams wrote:It is always easy to point to specific circumstances and apportion blame.

However, the way I look it is this. If we take as given the club will be debt free in 2021 then we can judge the period 2000-2021 as a complete success. In 2000 Sam Hammam turned up at CCFC as we got used to life again in the Fourth Division. His stated plan was to build a new stadium and make the club debt free.

By 2021 that will have been achieved. Of course others have contributed and the Lion's share has come from Vincent Tan.

That's why unlike 99% of other fans I admire both Sam Hammam and Vincent Tan because without either the new stadium project and the long term outlook would-not be bright. Both men are out of pocket (Sam received no return on his £24m over a 12 year period) and VT is highly unlikely to ever see the most of his again.

If there were pantomime villains during that period then it was Peter Ridsdale/PMG. Both took cost the club a substantial amount of money and despite their self-proclaimed boasts their involvement in the stadium project was both peripheral and costly.


Tony I agree with you on all points apart from the last bit.

The involvement of both Peter Ridsdale ( who I think should never again have been allowed to have a role in football after what he did to us and other clubs) and PMG was far from peripheral, it was vital to make the new stadium a reality. Under Sam the project was dead in the water and would have remained so if he had not been forced out of the club ( in a way which I believe was underhand and callous mind). PMG put up the money and financial guarantees and also got the retail park development plans back on their feet after a period when it was going nowhere and Ridsdale pursuaded the Council to support the plan after they said they wouldn't if Sam stayed.

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:19 pm

Forgive me if I'm wrong but I thought Sam drew a salary of £500,000 a year when he was in charge of the City, it was hardly no financial gain during his time here.

Re: Sam today

Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:24 pm

noisycat wrote:Forgive me if I'm wrong but I thought Sam drew a salary of £500,000 a year when he was in charge of the City, it was hardly no financial gain during his time here.

That was in the money he has had recently done very well out of us