Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:51 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 9:55 pm
CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:00 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:15 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:16 pm
CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:18 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Jones is a big unit of questionable desire and fitness. 3 games in 6 days ????
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:23 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:23 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:24 pm
Kanester wrote:CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
I think your right, Tonight was down to not finishing our chances and the ref.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:25 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:26 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Kanester wrote:CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
I think your right, Tonight was down to not finishing our chances and the ref.
3 shots on target the whole game only one the second.....We are not creating chances unless Watt does it on his own
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:26 pm
CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:30 pm
Pulisnewport wrote:CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
What point are you trying to make then ?
Who else is to blame?......
Slade best team lost, yes they were shocking but they won and got the 3 points.
It's happened many times before and will happen again.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:31 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:39 pm
CHRIS PIKE wrote:We created enough chances to win the game. Kenwyn is to lazy to get on the end of them ..
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:46 pm
City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:50 pm
llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
Fri Dec 18, 2015 10:58 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:02 pm
City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
We had more than 3 and Kenwynne should have buried 3 of them. I know what your agenda is but midfield played well tonight and good to watch. Kenwynne and the ref had shockers! It happens, we move on.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:04 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:09 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:10 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
We had more than 3 and Kenwynne should have buried 3 of them. I know what your agenda is but midfield played well tonight and good to watch. Kenwynne and the ref had shockers! It happens, we move on.
Not sure what you mean by agenda, we had three shots - fact.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:11 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:18 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
We had more than 3 and Kenwynne should have buried 3 of them. I know what your agenda is but midfield played well tonight and good to watch. Kenwynne and the ref had shockers! It happens, we move on.
Not sure what you mean by agenda, we had three shots - fact.
He is talking about my insistence that whoever plays in the CM role will never play well. Ralls and gunnar didn't create one chance tonight, slicker believes all our problem were down to Whitts, i believe its our system and i do concede Whitts isn't a 442 CM,but we play an antiquated system that we haven't the players for anyway.
It was three chances.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:31 pm
City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
We had more than 3 and Kenwynne should have buried 3 of them. I know what your agenda is but midfield played well tonight and good to watch. Kenwynne and the ref had shockers! It happens, we move on.
Not sure what you mean by agenda, we had three shots - fact.
He is talking about my insistence that whoever plays in the CM role will never play well. Ralls and gunnar didn't create one chance tonight, slicker believes all our problem were down to Whitts, i believe its our system and i do concede Whitts isn't a 442 CM,but we play an antiquated system that we haven't the players for anyway.
It was three chances.
I thought Ralls and Gunnar played well tonight, with some good interplay in the centre of midfield and good, pacy balls out to the wings. I couldn't fault it. I agree wholeheartedly with your observations on the system and I fully believe Slade should be more ready to adapt to different playing styles. My preference would often be 4-5-1 away. You and I don't disagree on systems, more on personnel.
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:43 pm
Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:47 pm
llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:City Slicker wrote:llan bluebird wrote:City Slicker wrote:Plenty of chances created but poor finishing let us down. KJ in particular.
3 shots on target 10 shots in total, brum had 14......
We had more than 3 and Kenwynne should have buried 3 of them. I know what your agenda is but midfield played well tonight and good to watch. Kenwynne and the ref had shockers! It happens, we move on.
Not sure what you mean by agenda, we had three shots - fact.
He is talking about my insistence that whoever plays in the CM role will never play well. Ralls and gunnar didn't create one chance tonight, slicker believes all our problem were down to Whitts, i believe its our system and i do concede Whitts isn't a 442 CM,but we play an antiquated system that we haven't the players for anyway.
It was three chances.
I thought Ralls and Gunnar played well tonight, with some good interplay in the centre of midfield and good, pacy balls out to the wings. I couldn't fault it. I agree wholeheartedly with your observations on the system and I fully believe Slade should be more ready to adapt to different playing styles. My preference would often be 4-5-1 away. You and I don't disagree on systems, more on personnel.
WOL has them both 5/10 which is too low but had Pilks as the star man 7/10 ....But i have never taken those seriously though as watt was 6/10I don't like Joe playing the deep role as there is a huge gap for gunnar to cover and Joe has the better long range shot.
Sat Dec 19, 2015 2:33 am
And why drop nooneNuclearblue wrote:CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
We was never going to score tonight we was toothless. And Slade dropping Fabio !! Why ?![]()
Sat Dec 19, 2015 2:33 am
And why drop nooneNuclearblue wrote:CHRIS PIKE wrote:The Ref cost us the game along with Kenwyn Jones, he should have scored at least 2 in the first half..
We was never going to score tonight we was toothless. And Slade dropping Fabio !! Why ?![]()
Sat Dec 19, 2015 5:37 am