Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:11 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:31 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:49 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 5:52 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:10 pm

Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:23 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:41 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Guess Rotherham milwall yesterday wasn't a warning what can happen with our minority idiots? Yes easily done but at what potential cost to club and good supporters?![]()
Ninian park wasn't that long ago and look at aggro there!
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:41 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:48 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:55 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Guess Rotherham milwall yesterday wasn't a warning what can happen with our minority idiots? Yes easily done but at what potential cost to club and good supporters?![]()
Ninian park wasn't that long ago and look at aggro there!
You are talking Millwall here, they are a law unto themselves, you cannot compare us or anyone else with Millwall for sheer disregard for the law or their liberty
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:57 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:59 pm
griff105 wrote:It wont happen because the club doesnt understand and a lot of our fans dont understand.
They just want to sit down, eat sandwiches and play on their phones.
Big nasty football fans need not apply.
Shhhhhhh
Sun Mar 01, 2015 6:59 pm
llan bluebird wrote:I swapped seats yesterday into the Canton and sussed what is missing.....14~ 18 year kids in groups
When i was that age, being 10 stone soaking I didn't get into the scraps, but would I mouth off in the Bob bank singing such favourites as" it a long way to central station" and of course "you're going to get your f*****ng head kicked in"
We need to make it much much cheaper for yoofs........
Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:04 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Guess Rotherham milwall yesterday wasn't a warning what can happen with our minority idiots? Yes easily done but at what potential cost to club and good supporters?![]()
Ninian park wasn't that long ago and look at aggro there!
You are talking Millwall here, they are a law unto themselves, you cannot compare us or anyone else with Millwall for sheer disregard for the law or their liberty
Yes but add wolves leeds swansea and several others to list? Dont forget no police in stadium now that will imediately stop for all games! Costs go up restrictions away will be even worse than know, its a non starter as i said before stadium designed to stop aggro we had at ninian,
Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:19 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:29 pm
Sun Mar 01, 2015 7:53 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Guess Rotherham milwall yesterday wasn't a warning what can happen with our minority idiots? Yes easily done but at what potential cost to club and good supporters?![]()
Ninian park wasn't that long ago and look at aggro there!
You are talking Millwall here, they are a law unto themselves, you cannot compare us or anyone else with Millwall for sheer disregard for the law or their liberty
Yes but add wolves leeds swansea and several others to list? Dont forget no police in stadium now that will imediately stop for all games! Costs go up restrictions away will be even worse than know, its a non starter as i said before stadium designed to stop aggro we had at ninian,
Your being alarmistFor the high profile games, a couple of officers down the side would more than suffice, everyone bar the odd screwball is too weary of the CCTV to do anything. The positives to the atmosphere out way any negatives
Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:50 pm
Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:42 pm
cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Mon Mar 02, 2015 7:33 pm
ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:22 pm
griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Whats it got to do with rights? People just want to generate a little bit of atmosphere. By hearing oppossing fans it adds to the rivarly. Especially when you can hear them singing.
What difference would it make to those in the family stand if they switched to the canton? The view would be very similar.
Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:01 am
pembroke allan wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Guess Rotherham milwall yesterday wasn't a warning what can happen with our minority idiots? Yes easily done but at what potential cost to club and good supporters?![]()
Ninian park wasn't that long ago and look at aggro there!
You are talking Millwall here, they are a law unto themselves, you cannot compare us or anyone else with Millwall for sheer disregard for the law or their liberty
Yes but add wolves leeds swansea and several others to list? Dont forget no police in stadium now that will imediately stop for all games! Costs go up restrictions away will be even worse than know, its a non starter as i said before stadium designed to stop aggro we had at ninian,
Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:46 am
Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:50 am
Wed Mar 11, 2015 7:12 am
ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Whats it got to do with rights? People just want to generate a little bit of atmosphere. By hearing oppossing fans it adds to the rivarly. Especially when you can hear them singing.
What difference would it make to those in the family stand if they switched to the canton? The view would be very similar.
Surely it is everything to do with rights.People who sit in the Family Stand have been canvassed by the club in the past and overwhelmingly said they want to stay there. What right has a small number of fans to override those wishes?
If people want to generate an atmosphere by all means do so by standing and singing in the stand set aside for that? Why the desire to be next to away fans watching them rather than watching the game?
Unfortunately we still have a small number of fans (as witneawwssed at Bournemouth) who can't be trusted to be next to members
of the human race let alone next to away fans.Why should the club spend a fortune on extra stewards and/policing to accommodate them to the detriment of other fans?
Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:24 am
Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:13 am
griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Whats it got to do with rights? People just want to generate a little bit of atmosphere. By hearing oppossing fans it adds to the rivarly. Especially when you can hear them singing.
What difference would it make to those in the family stand if they switched to the canton? The view would be very similar.
Surely it is everything to do with rights.People who sit in the Family Stand have been canvassed by the club in the past and overwhelmingly said they want to stay there. What right has a small number of fans to override those wishes?
If people want to generate an atmosphere by all means do so by standing and singing in the stand set aside for that? Why the desire to be next to away fans watching them rather than watching the game?
Unfortunately we still have a small number of fans (as witneawwssed at Bournemouth) who can't be trusted to be next to members
of the human race let alone next to away fans.Why should the club spend a fortune on extra stewards and/policing to accommodate them to the detriment of other fans?
You say nobody answered your question then answer mine.
What difference it make to the fans in the family stand if they watched from the canton?
Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:46 am
ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Whats it got to do with rights? People just want to generate a little bit of atmosphere. By hearing oppossing fans it adds to the rivarly. Especially when you can hear them singing.
What difference would it make to those in the family stand if they switched to the canton? The view would be very similar.
Surely it is everything to do with rights.People who sit in the Family Stand have been canvassed by the club in the past and overwhelmingly said they want to stay there. What right has a small number of fans to override those wishes?
If people want to generate an atmosphere by all means do so by standing and singing in the stand set aside for that? Why the desire to be next to away fans watching them rather than watching the game?
Unfortunately we still have a small number of fans (as witneawwssed at Bournemouth) who can't be trusted to be next to members
of the human race let alone next to away fans.Why should the club spend a fortune on extra stewards and/policing to accommodate them to the detriment of other fans?
You say nobody answered your question then answer mine.
What difference it make to the fans in the family stand if they watched from the canton?
The difference is that they will have been forced to relocate from an area of the ground that they have clearly stated they wish to remain in just to accomodate a small number of fans who seem to think they are better or have more rights to their choice of seats than they do. Why do you believe you have the right to tell them where they should sit?
Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:21 am
Leytonstoneblue wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:griff105 wrote:ccfcsince62 wrote:cardiff 74 wrote:The club should think about putting our fans back by the away fans to drown them out we can't keep having fans coming here and out singing us more so when they bring big support the atmosphere at Derby was fantastic when I was there with City this season they are right by the away fans same at west bromich albion
Every time someone raises this issue I contribute the same answer which no one seems able to answer.
Why do those people who keep asking the club to swap around the ends of the stadium think they have any greater rights than all the people who want to remain in their seats in the Famsily Stand?
Whats it got to do with rights? People just want to generate a little bit of atmosphere. By hearing oppossing fans it adds to the rivarly. Especially when you can hear them singing.
What difference would it make to those in the family stand if they switched to the canton? The view would be very similar.
Surely it is everything to do with rights.People who sit in the Family Stand have been canvassed by the club in the past and overwhelmingly said they want to stay there. What right has a small number of fans to override those wishes?
If people want to generate an atmosphere by all means do so by standing and singing in the stand set aside for that? Why the desire to be next to away fans watching them rather than watching the game?
Unfortunately we still have a small number of fans (as witneawwssed at Bournemouth) who can't be trusted to be next to members
of the human race let alone next to away fans.Why should the club spend a fortune on extra stewards and/policing to accommodate them to the detriment of other fans?
You say nobody answered your question then answer mine.
What difference it make to the fans in the family stand if they watched from the canton?
The difference is that they will have been forced to relocate from an area of the ground that they have clearly stated they wish to remain in just to accomodate a small number of fans who seem to think they are better or have more rights to their choice of seats than they do. Why do you believe you have the right to tell them where they should sit?
Saved me a post thanks![]()
![]()
Looking at it logically, it just doesn't make sense to me that parents would actually enjoy being sat next to the away section where their children have the greatest chance/risk of being verbally abused and frightened by the language or gestures that usually come from all away supporters. Why anyone would want to argue that is a better place for families to sit rather than the other end of the ground just doesn't add up.
Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:43 am