Sam Hamman

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

Neither.

Sam won't be welcomed back by me.

Tan.

Just a thought. Sam very supportive of VT rebranding so i recall then Langstone settled.

I don't suggest for one minute he would get fans to stir up a mutiny against VT with a view to stepping back in with a consortium but just wondered what fans feelings would be? Especially if a return to blue was offered?

Sam would be everyone's choice if he offered a return to blue but we'd be back to square one on owing money to him again.
Tan is far more ambitious but wants to get a sound financial footing with the recent appointment of Ken Choo

Only hypothetical post, i imagine VT would need fans really against him to bow out on the cheap and can't see any fans who would be that against him to set up such a stance?

Sam has been paid £15mill and monthly payments started back up again from Tan, January just gone and are continuing.
Tan owns the naming rights to the stadium.

I wouldn't be surprised if Sam ended up back as chairman or owner if Tan does indeed want out . I'm not sure if I could trust him TBH

Annis do you think Sam would want back in?

Annis do you think Sam would want back in?

No Paul, I dont think he does.

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

We outgrew Sam years ago, he should buy a small team in the lower Leagues like Chesterfield, he couldn't afford to run us now......

Last edited by Bluebina on Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sam has been paid £15mill and monthly payments started back up again from Tan, January just gone and are continuing.
Tan owns the naming rights to the stadium.

Why on earth hasn't the naming rights been sorted? Especially while in the Prem?

Sam has been paid £15mill and monthly payments started back up again from Tan, January just gone and are continuing.
Tan owns the naming rights to the stadium.

Why on earth hasn't the naming rights been sorted? Especially while in the Prem?

Ask Tan? Tan has now owned the naming rights for nearly a year now.

I prefer Tan to SH all day long.

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

It's an idea that has been floated on here a few times.

VT for me any day of the week, month, year, decade, century or millennium

like my bro Tan for me every day Tan is the man as my bro says, long live the Red

Sam has been paid £15mill and monthly payments started back up again from Tan, January just gone and are continuing.
Tan owns the naming rights to the stadium.

I didn't know that Tan owned the naming rights I must admit.

I shall look forward to visiting the "Stick Your Blue Shirt Up Your Arse" Stadium next season.

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

I believe sam wanting back in is the reason for alot of anti tan posts
he's a consistent liar and a dictator that involves himself in the dressing room and dugout he messed up before and he will eventually kill our club
Why doesn't sam f**k off from our club and buy an horrible club like luton town or something

Sam has been paid £15mill and monthly payments started back up again from Tan, January just gone and are continuing.
Tan owns the naming rights to the stadium.

Why on earth hasn't the naming rights been sorted? Especially while in the Prem?

I'm wondering if it's something to do with FFP, it means he can sell them at anytime, potentially to himself for a big sum? Of income to balance off against a loss.

Or a value when selling us.

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

I believe sam wanting back in is the reason for alot of anti tan posts
he's a consistent liar and a dictator that involves himself in the dressing room and dugout he messed up before and he will eventually kill our club
Why doesn't sam f**k off from our club and buy an horrible club like luton town or something

Clutching at straws

Jinks, Sam does not want back in

And the Anti Tan stuff as u call it, have you forgot Tan has stripped our club of its identity and that I can never forgive him for and you know thats my reason for the last 2yrs. I was never against him before that.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Alex, Jinks has been wrong for months and just comes in with his sly snipes.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Imagine if enough fans turned against Tan and he wanted out at a reduced cost would SH as part of a consortium be welcome back??

Who'd u prefer Sam or VT??

I believe sam wanting back in is the reason for alot of anti tan posts
he's a consistent liar and a dictator that involves himself in the dressing room and dugout he messed up before and he will eventually kill our club
Why doesn't sam f**k off from our club and buy an horrible club like luton town or something

Clutching at straws

Jinks, Sam does not want back in

And the Anti Tan stuff as u call it, have you forgot Tan has stripped our club of its identity and that I can never forgive him for and you know thats my reason for the last 2yrs. I was never against him before that.

Nothing against anyone anti tan for the colour.. but some of your posts scrape the barrel

Chuckles ankles no2

If anyone deserves that title, it's you. You get most things wrong.

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

What is very visible is the pro-reds have gone back into their box since Hamman come back on board and that's all I am saying on this subject Annis

What is very visible is the pro-reds have gone back into their box since Hamman come back on board and that's all I am saying on this subject Annis

If you think Sam is a blue then think again. He's as red as Natman. I'd like both parasites to f**k off away from our club.

That's my point. Read my post and think of what the message really is

A Jinks accusation being wildly wrong?? Surely not.

Chuckles ankles no2

Name calling now Jinks, when your losing a debate u revert to this

Just because we agree on the Blue and what Tan has done to our club.

It seems for the last few months you cant debate anymore, just snipe after snipe Jinks, your letting yourself down.

Board warning issued
Sent: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:50 pm
From: Forever Blue
To: Jinks

The following is a warning which has been issued to you by an administrator or moderator of this site.
Name calling and sniping please stop

Ok will you be consistent now annis and give warnings to everyone name calling? you yourself have been calling posters tan arselickers isnt that name calling?
Plenty of name calling on this board and calling chuckles ankles no2 as a joke is hardly crime of the century...