Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:09 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:18 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:22 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:31 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:33 pm
Natman Blue wrote:No suggestions?
Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:46 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 8:56 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:00 pm
Natman Blue wrote:I've been hearing the bright idea was a lot more closer to home
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:06 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I've been hearing the bright idea was a lot more closer to home
From what I understand, it wasn't Tan, but someone on the staff who wanted to push through the rebrand...
Could be rubbish, could be true.. Just what I heard.
Whoever it was, well done to them. Made many people realise how wrong this rebrand has been.
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:10 pm
Natman Blue wrote:What is they were convincing him it was a good thing (the rebrand generally) and was doing this just to cause trouble? I heard Malky was severely unimpressed with this person too
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:12 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I've been hearing the bright idea was a lot more closer to home
From what I understand, it wasn't Tan, but someone on the staff who wanted to push through the rebrand...
Could be rubbish, could be true.. Just what I heard.
Whoever it was, well done to them. Made many people realise how wrong this rebrand has been.
What is they were convincing him it was a good thing (the rebrand generally) and was doing this just to cause trouble? I heard Malky was severely unimpressed with this person too
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:15 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I've been hearing the bright idea was a lot more closer to home
From what I understand, it wasn't Tan, but someone on the staff who wanted to push through the rebrand...
Could be rubbish, could be true.. Just what I heard.
Whoever it was, well done to them. Made many people realise how wrong this rebrand has been.
What is they were convincing him it was a good thing (the rebrand generally) and was doing this just to cause trouble? I heard Malky was severely unimpressed with this person too
So in your humbly red opinion Chief who was the person ? A high profile well known person behind the scene who wanted to lick Mr Tans ring piece ? We await with baited breath. Now flap those gums son.
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:21 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:23 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Ffs it was Isaacs.
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:24 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Ffs it was Isaacs.
Who told you that Ian?
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:32 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:I've been hearing the bright idea was a lot more closer to home
From what I understand, it wasn't Tan, but someone on the staff who wanted to push through the rebrand...
Could be rubbish, could be true.. Just what I heard.
Whoever it was, well done to them. Made many people realise how wrong this rebrand has been.
What is they were convincing him it was a good thing (the rebrand generally) and was doing this just to cause trouble? I heard Malky was severely unimpressed with this person too
So in your humbly red opinion Chief who was the person ? A high profile well known person behind the scene who wanted to lick Mr Tans ring piece ? We await with baited breath. Now flap those gums son.
No. Just wanted to stir as far as I'm aware. Many other things been done too
Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:44 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:39 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Ffs it was Isaacs.
Who told you that Ian?
No one. I work it out.
Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:54 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Ffs it was Isaacs.
Who told you that Ian?
No one. I work it out.
so our what did you use to work it out?
Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:55 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:21 pm
Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:29 pm
HeinerTaller wrote:Now im confused! Isaac didnt have anything to do with it, did he?
Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:49 pm
Natman Blue wrote:so, whose idea was it?
Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:16 am
Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:17 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Natman Blue wrote:so, whose idea was it?
i think it was Tans........there was red about the ground prior to that game,but not lots.......and no real opposition to it,so it seemed..... pretty obvious thing to do looking at how things were, help the ground turn red with a gesture of good will........it was much too soon......
Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:27 am
Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:37 am
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote::roll:
Dont flatter yourself you pair of bum boys were not the first to be outed for having multi's
Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:47 am
simon.wiesenthal wrote:Natman Blue wrote:so, whose idea was it?
i think it was Tans........there was red about the ground prior to that game,but not lots.......and no real opposition to it,so it seemed..... pretty obvious thing to do looking at how things were, help the ground turn red with a gesture of good will........it was much too soon......
Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:35 am
Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:49 am
Green Arrow wrote:Why not just say? You whoppers criticise Annis and Carl for not giving full info and say its stirring. You're doing exactly the same. Either name the person in question or stfu you drama seeking jebend.