Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:35 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:42 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:46 pm
TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:52 pm
Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:52 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:53 pm
Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:54 pm
TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager?![]()
Jog on
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:54 pm
TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager?![]()
Jog on
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:56 pm
Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager?![]()
Jog on
NO
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:56 pm
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:59 pm
TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager?![]()
Jog on
NO
Not sure what point you are trying to prove you numpty
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:00 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:00 pm
Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:When we can't even pass the ball effectively
Absolutely shocking display so far
same old TRose always moaning
They all think they are managers Jinks
I can't analyse the game because I'm not a manager?![]()
Jog on
NO
Not sure what point you are trying to prove you numpty
Big ears
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:01 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:01 pm
TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:06 pm
TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:08 pm
TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:09 pm
Jinks wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
At this time we are not losing
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:10 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:13 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
Spot on. This guy rose is clueless.
4 2 f*cking 4 indeed
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:18 pm
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:23 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:25 pm
TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3
I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously![]()
We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic
They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward
We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing
And I expect us to be able to pass the ball
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:26 pm
Aramore wrote:I am turning my back on this thread due to the ignorance spouted by the OP.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:26 pm
TRose69 wrote:Aramore wrote:I am turning my back on this thread due to the ignorance spouted by the OP.
Crack on - you haven't contributed anything
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:28 pm
TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3
I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously![]()
We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic
They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward
We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing
And I expect us to be able to pass the ball
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:32 pm
Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3
I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously![]()
We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic
They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward
We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing
And I expect us to be able to pass the ball
You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football![]()
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:46 pm
TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3
I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously![]()
We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic
They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward
We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing
And I expect us to be able to pass the ball
You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football![]()
You sound like someone who is to scared to voice a valid opinion on football and is content to slate other peoples opinions without offering anything constructive![]()
And f**k me an unbelievable long shot by cala!
Let's hope we can hold on eh
Sat Apr 12, 2014 3:50 pm
Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:Arrow wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:llandaffbluebird1 wrote:TRose69 wrote:We might as well play 4-3-3 or 4-2-4 as we cannot keep it in midfield with 5
And same old jinks always condescending - I'm guessing you arnt watching the game because we are playing shit![]()
Show me something positive about our club or this game at the moment and I will stop moaning
You do know 4-1-4-1 and 4-3-3 are pretty much the same, right? And 4-2-4? Are you on drugs?
34% possession first half has proved my point for me
No they are completely different which is why we see Campbell up front on his own rather than three player up front![]()
I also realise that 4-2-4 is a ridiculous formation - I am simply proving a point that there is no point in us having a large midfield because we cannot get a pass in even when we try and pack out the midfield
Yes they are. When the wingers go forward in a 4-1-4-1 it becomes 4-3-3, when they go back it becomes 4-1-4-1. No-one plays 4-3-3 with three strikers unless they are chasing a goal.
And if we go with 2 midfielders we would probably see less of the ball so it would be absolutely pointless.
I don't know what you are expecting really, we are not going to pass Southampton off of the park so Ole set's us up NOT to get bypassed in midfield and then we can counter them when the inevitably press forward. All we need is pace on the wings and we'd probably create a few more chances.
If Campbell wasn't isolated every time he was off the ball I could possibly try and see your point - but he is so it is definatly nothing like a 4-3-3
I will reiterate that 4-2-4 was a facetious comment - bit to be taken seriously![]()
We need three points from this so 34% possession and being forced back every time we have possession is not a great tactic
They have hit the bar, the ball his caulker a hand in the box & they have looked very dangerous going forward
We have looked like a shower of shit - we need to attack down the wing and get the ball in the box which we just don't seem capable of doing
And I expect us to be able to pass the ball
You sound like an ex rugby supporter that has just started to watch football![]()
You sound like someone who is to scared to voice a valid opinion on football and is content to slate other peoples opinions without offering anything constructive![]()
And f**k me an unbelievable long shot by cala!
Let's hope we can hold on eh
5 man midfield seems to be working at the momentMarshall helps though
Sat Apr 12, 2014 4:02 pm