Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:56 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 2:58 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:00 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:02 pm
CF47 BLUEBIRD wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Hes become a parody of David Icke
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:03 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:04 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:06 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:So, you're making assumptions then? Or making things up? Exactly what you've just slated military Junta for in another thread?
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:10 pm
Military Junta wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:So, you're making assumptions then? Or making things up? Exactly what you've just slated military Junta for in another thread?
Excatly the guy is a f*cking loon and thats coming from me!!!
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:15 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:18 pm
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:39 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:45 pm
Piss off twatman you boring boring man.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 3:57 pm
GotMeSingingTheBlues wrote:"The worst of the lot are that Cardiff City Forum, they can't keep quiet about anything" explained Caulker![]()
![]()
Piss off twatman you boring boring man.
Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:37 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:56 pm
Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:55 pm
northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
The captains of Swindon and derby also raised similar concerns during their time at the top table . Embarrassing frankly .
Fri Apr 11, 2014 10:27 pm
Natman Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
The captains of Swindon and derby also raised similar concerns during their time at the top table . Embarrassing frankly .
Yes! But for some reason people want to deny the damage leaks and messages board leaks cause
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:45 pm
northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
The captains of Swindon and derby also raised similar concerns during their time at the top table . Embarrassing frankly .
Yes! But for some reason people want to deny the damage leaks and messages board leaks cause
Not sure I understand your point ? Leaks on this board have contributed to us being utter shit since Dec time ?
Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:56 pm
Natman Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
The captains of Swindon and derby also raised similar concerns during their time at the top table . Embarrassing frankly .
Yes! But for some reason people want to deny the damage leaks and messages board leaks cause
Not sure I understand your point ? Leaks on this board have contributed to us being utter shit since Dec time ?
Not necessarily, just that leaks will get to and affect the players
Sat Apr 12, 2014 12:59 am
northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:northside of risca wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote::lol: the fact that you're asking how much damage does this board do, is lunacy.
Unless you can put a reasoned argument against what Caulker has said in that interview then please leave it to the adults
(how did i know you'd be one of the first to comment)
The captains of Swindon and derby also raised similar concerns during their time at the top table . Embarrassing frankly .
Yes! But for some reason people want to deny the damage leaks and messages board leaks cause
Not sure I understand your point ? Leaks on this board have contributed to us being utter shit since Dec time ?
Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:53 am
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:03 am
jtc wrote:natman ,after the swansea home game caulker did a interview where he was asked about playing for the jacks.s.c was polite but added im a bluebird now..not a cardiff player .a bluebird...it was apparent he knew what all the fuss is about regarding the rebrand.of course players hear things but it certainly didnt affect him or the team that day did it?
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:22 am
Natman Blue wrote:To be honest I'm not sure, and it might not even be a direct affect as in them reading it. These message boards can sometimes change the groundswell of opinion (a la Taylor and Whitts bashing or rebrand protesting) which spills over into the game and creates a negative atmosphere which will undoubtedly impact on the players.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:25 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:To be honest I'm not sure, and it might not even be a direct affect as in them reading it. These message boards can sometimes change the groundswell of opinion (a la Taylor and Whitts bashing or rebrand protesting) which spills over into the game and creates a negative atmosphere which will undoubtedly impact on the players.
What tosh. The last rebrand protest against Liverpool ADDED to the atmosphere, not caused a negative atmosphere.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:30 am
Natman Blue wrote:jtc wrote:natman ,after the swansea home game caulker did a interview where he was asked about playing for the jacks.s.c was polite but added im a bluebird now..not a cardiff player .a bluebird...it was apparent he knew what all the fuss is about regarding the rebrand.of course players hear things but it certainly didnt affect him or the team that day did it?
To be honest I'm not sure, and it might not even be a direct affect as in them reading it. These message boards can sometimes change the groundswell of opinion (a la Taylor and Whitts bashing or rebrand protesting) which spills over into the game and creates a negative atmosphere which will undoubtedly impact on the players.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:32 am
jtc wrote:Natman Blue wrote:jtc wrote:natman ,after the swansea home game caulker did a interview where he was asked about playing for the jacks.s.c was polite but added im a bluebird now..not a cardiff player .a bluebird...it was apparent he knew what all the fuss is about regarding the rebrand.of course players hear things but it certainly didnt affect him or the team that day did it?
To be honest I'm not sure, and it might not even be a direct affect as in them reading it. These message boards can sometimes change the groundswell of opinion (a la Taylor and Whitts bashing or rebrand protesting) which spills over into the game and creates a negative atmosphere which will undoubtedly impact on the players.
happens at most clubs nat.yr club has more negativity surrounding it than most though.it,s a free country.so if people want to galvanise support for protest on a m/b that,s fine.vincent and his rice sprinklers should remember this.they cannot have freedom to drive around wales without been moniterred by the state and do newspaper articles when they feel like it to push their agenda then moan about fans using any media outlet to try and oppose it.it cuts both ways.if there was no rebrand then 90% of the negitivity would not be manifesting itself at the ccs on a saturday.as for the arguement well it will affect the team/club if people dissent.that,s the whole point.a lot of people think the team/club is barely reconisable to the team/club they grew to love.tan created that.what he is getting now is the consequences of his actions.
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:32 am
Natman Blue wrote:
and there is he is again![]()
Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:37 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Natman Blue wrote:
and there is he is again![]()
Yep, putting right your inaccuracies, as usual.![]()
If you think this message board has such a negative affect on the club, why do you continually post on it?
Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:00 am
Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:05 am
Berwyn wrote:I've never seen so much bollucks in one thread. So are we saying the players play shit because of something written on a MB? ffs " sorry I played shit but I'm being cyber bullied":-):-):-):-):-):-):-)