' Not looking good for Sunderland & Norwich City '

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=137773
Sunderland aways

Liverpool
Spurs
Chelsea
Man U
Man City
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=137773


Norwich City's last 4 games

20/04 Norwich v Liverpool
26/04 Man Utd v Norwich
03/05 Chelsea v Norwich
11/05 Norwich v Arsenal

It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham in the Championship *




















*Hopefully

It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham in the Championship *




















*Hopefully

Or even yourselves

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=137773
Sunderland aways

Liverpool
Spurs
Chelsea
Man U
Man City
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=137773


Norwich City's last 4 games

20/04 Norwich v Liverpool
26/04 Man Utd v Norwich
03/05 Chelsea v Norwich
11/05 Norwich v Arsenal

sunderlands home games arent that bad and thats where the points matter

That's why I call jack fans = toenails they so far up their own arses the only thing you see are their toenails

It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham in the Championship *




















*Hopefully

Fair play, I read this and yeah you hope. Then i scrolled down

It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham in the Championship *






















*Hopefully

Or even yourselves

[quote="NJ73"]It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham


And you

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

I love how Cardiff fans are so dull they didn't even see the "hopefully" at the bottom of my post

It's between those two for the final relegation spot to join yourselves and Fulham in the Championship *




















*Hopefully

Or even yourselves

6 points and we'll be fine, especially if 3 of those are against Norwich as I can't see yourselves or Fulham getting 11 & 12 points respectively from your remaining games so that would leave just one spot which imho will go to Norwich or Sunderland.

Interestingly they meet on Sat. A draw probably the best result there for both of us.

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

I love how Cardiff fans are so dull they didn't even see the "hopefully" at the bottom of my post

Nj that was a non discript comment which had no reference to your team?

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

I love how Cardiff fans are so dull they didn't even see the "hopefully" at the bottom of my post

Nj that was a non discript comment which had no reference to your team?

Indeed, and not in response to my post at all of course

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

I love how Cardiff fans are so dull they didn't even see the "hopefully" at the bottom of my post

Not at all. Saw it and still feel that way. you lot think you're a lot better than you actually are. Judging by Chico Flores outburst on twitter after your defeat to west ham, some of the players do too.

I love how Swansea fans are so deluded that they can't even see themselves slipping towards the trapdoor themselves.

1 point out of 6 against their relegation rivals at home... Both from winning positions. What an inspired choice Monk was.

I love how Cardiff fans are so dull they didn't even see the "hopefully" at the bottom of my post

Not at all. Saw it and still feel that way. you lot think you're a lot better than you actually are. Judging by Chico Flores outburst on twitter after your defeat to west ham, some of the players do too.

If you'd read our board recently, which you have, you'd know that there are many panicking about our position.

I wouldn't judge anything by Chico's tweets if I were you, the guy is borderline insane

There are also a fair number of fans that are totally unconcerned by your position. Roathie on here, for example.

In a relegation scrap, I'd rather not have a player who put style over three points, which is what he was implying to Carlton Cole.... Or at least, his parody.

Choco is such a gift to jack hating, he always makes it so much fun. That fur coat this weak, just hilarious

There are also a fair number of fans that are totally unconcerned by your position. Roathie on here, for example.

In a relegation scrap, I'd rather not have a player who put style over three points, which is what he was implying to Carlton Cole.... Or at least, his parody.

I count myself in that "fair number".

I'm confident we will stay up. I may be proven wrong but at this point in time, but I'm confident even though I'm not expecting anything from our next two games.

As for Chico, he gives 100% on the pitch, that's all that matters. Even if he is a loony tune

Nothing from the next two games and Norwich is suddenly crucial. Not sure what I'd want to happen there... Guess it all depends on how the table will look at that point. They are a bit of a bogey team for you though.

1 point in 6 at home against relegation rivals isn't great form for you guys though.

Nothing from the next two games and Norwich is suddenly crucial. Not sure what I'd want to happen there... Guess it all depends on how the table will look at that point. They are a bit of a bogey team for you though.

1 point in 6 at home against relegation rivals isn't great form for you guys though.

Norwich will indeed be crucial, anything from the next 2 games is a huge bonus. As for them being our bogey side, that was more a Grant Holt being our nemesis thing.

We should have beaten them up there in December and probably would have if it were not for Dyer going off injured in the first half after scoring as he had been running them ragged.

I still say 6 more points and we'll be fine. 7 if 3 of those aren't against Norwich.

Norwich will indeed be crucial, anything from the next 2 games is a huge bonus. As for them being our bogey side, that was more a Grant Holt being our nemesis thing.

We should have beaten them up there in December and probably would have if it were not for Dyer going off injured in the first half after scoring as he had been running them ragged.

As I said, bogey side.

Could have, would have, should have... How many times do we hear you lot saying that. as I say, too arrogant.

Norwich will indeed be crucial, anything from the next 2 games is a huge bonus. As for them being our bogey side, that was more a Grant Holt being our nemesis thing.

We should have beaten them up there in December and probably would have if it were not for Dyer going off injured in the first half after scoring as he had been running them ragged.

As I said, bogey side.

Could have, would have, should have... How many times do we hear you lot saying that. as I say, too arrogant.

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

The fact that they consistently beat you points to the fact that they are your bogey side. you do know what that means, right?

I actually saw the game and it was a fair result. Clutching at straws would be suggesting that you should have won.

As I said, far too arrogant.

They haven't beaten us since Holt left, hence him being our nemesis rather than them being our bogey side

I didn't say we should have won, I said in my opinion we would have won if Dyer hadn't been stretchered off.

How is that arrogant?

They haven't lost either I don't think... As I said, bogey side.

Could have would have should have...... Keep clutching at those straws.



Oh... You've deleted your post.

Last edited by Barry Chuckle on Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

The fact that they consistently beat you points to the fact that they are your bogey side. you do know what that means, right?

I actually saw the game and it was a fair result. Clutching at straws would be suggesting that you should have won.

As I said, far too arrogant.

They haven't beaten us since Holt left, hence him being our nemesis rather than them being our bogey side.

In my opinion if Dyer hadn't been stretchered off, we would have won as they weren't in the game up to that point.

How is that arrogant?

I didn't say we should have won...

We should have beaten them up there in December.

Now I see why you deleted that post.

As I said... Arrogant.

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

The fact that they consistently beat you points to the fact that they are your bogey side. you do know what that means, right?

I actually saw the game and it was a fair result. Clutching at straws would be suggesting that you should have won.

As I said, far too arrogant.

They haven't beaten us since Holt left, hence him being our nemesis rather than them being our bogey side.

In my opinion if Dyer hadn't been stretchered off, we would have won as they weren't in the game up to that point.

How is that arrogant?

Have you beaten them since Holt left

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

The fact that they consistently beat you points to the fact that they are your bogey side. you do know what that means, right?

I actually saw the game and it was a fair result. Clutching at straws would be suggesting that you should have won.

As I said, far too arrogant.

They haven't beaten us since Holt left, hence him being our nemesis rather than them being our bogey side.

In my opinion if Dyer hadn't been stretchered off, we would have won as they weren't in the game up to that point.

How is that arrogant?

Have you beaten them since Holt left

We've played them once which was away from home and drew 1-1.

I didn't say we should have won...

We should have beaten them up there in December.

Now I see why you deleted that post.

As I said... Arrogant.

Not like you to get caught up focusing on one word in an entire thread

Indeed I did say we should have won, I was wrong in stating I hadn't said that and that's why I deleted my post, hardly a conspiracy

But the fact remains we should have/could have have won the game in my opinion given the way the game panned out until Dyer went off which was a game changer. Especially seeing as they equalised in the last minute of the 1st half injury time caused by the Dyer injury.

But I'm sure you'll rather focus on the semantics

Nothing about that points to them being our bogey side. Every other game they have completely outplayed us, this time we were the better side.

It's arrogant to assume we would have won the game if the guy running them ragged had not gone off injured? It's nothing that can be proven but a perfectly reasonable assumption.

Keep clutching at those straws Baz

The fact that they consistently beat you points to the fact that they are your bogey side. you do know what that means, right?

I actually saw the game and it was a fair result. Clutching at straws would be suggesting that you should have won.

As I said, far too arrogant.

They haven't beaten us since Holt left, hence him being our nemesis rather than them being our bogey side.

In my opinion if Dyer hadn't been stretchered off, we would have won as they weren't in the game up to that point.

How is that arrogant?

Have you beaten them since Holt left

We've played them once which was away from home and drew 1-1.

so no you haven't then , bogey side