Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:04 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:06 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:08 pm
First_Touch wrote:I think you are suffering from sleep deprivation!
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:09 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:10 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:First_Touch wrote:I think you are suffering from sleep deprivation!
So you think by keeping Tan in power is a good idea if your goal is blue back?
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:21 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Its about gaining numbers. Not many want Tan out so a few hundred wont bother him. You get a few thousand marching for blue and after a few peaceful marches and he hasnt changed his mind you have a few thousand who now want Tan out. Small steps.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:33 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:38 pm
carlccfc wrote:I have not met a Cardiff fan who wants to be red, we all want to be blue but have differing opinions about the whole rebrand, it's implications and possible scenarios of upsetting Tan.
This protest is to show that we agree together on one thing and that is the return of blue as our traditional home kit and restoring the bluebird to that of prominence and not an afterthought.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:41 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:carlccfc wrote:I have not met a Cardiff fan who wants to be red, we all want to be blue but have differing opinions about the whole rebrand, it's implications and possible scenarios of upsetting Tan.
This protest is to show that we agree together on one thing and that is the return of blue as our traditional home kit and restoring the bluebird to that of prominence and not an afterthought.
I agree with your first point.
Second point is, well, my point really. If you all know you want to be blue then why march about it if nobody wants to remove Tan - which lets face it, is the only way to get blue back.
Do you see where I'm coming from that it looks a bit pointless? Seems like a "ill show my face" type of protest rather than one actively looking for and invoking change.
Tell me if im being unfair.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:46 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:52 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:53 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:55 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:56 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:56 pm
carlccfc wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Tan has stated that 90% are supportive of him and only 10% and possibly less are not supportive.
Hopefully this will show that his 90% claim will be dismissed in front of his own eyes.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:56 pm
carlccfc wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Tan has stated that 90% are supportive of him and only 10% and possibly less are not supportive.
Hopefully this will show that his 90% claim will be dismissed in front of his own eyes.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:20 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:29 pm
GENERAL CHAT wrote:carlccfc wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Tan has stated that 90% are supportive of him and only 10% and possibly less are not supportive.
Hopefully this will show that his 90% claim will be dismissed in front of his own eyes.
Even so Carl, I doubt he will change his stance on red.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:46 pm
carlccfc wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:carlccfc wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Excuse my questioning but it really is not making much sense to me.
everybody already knows that everybody wants blue back. But what seems odd is the ones who want to ACTUALLY get the blue back by calling for Tan out are being "hushed".
So is the march to invoke a change back to blue? It cant be in reality can it?
Tan has stated that 90% are supportive of him and only 10% and possibly less are not supportive.
Hopefully this will show that his 90% claim will be dismissed in front of his own eyes.
Even so Carl, I doubt he will change his stance on red.
Correct but not doing anything at all will give him the impression that we don't care about our tradition and hopefully stop him going any further, also it helps to keep the blue in the stadium and youngsters especially may remember we are a blue football club.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:57 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:42 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:04 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:10 pm
" WE ARE CARDIFF CITY WE WILL ALWAYS BE BLUE "
Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:12 pm
RYANBLUE wrote:Do I want blue back...? Yes do I want Tan out...No. For that reason I am not going on the march because that's what it will turn into: racist, bullshit comments and attitude.
Especially with BU there it's got disaster written all over it.
At the end of the day I still want a side to support. Having some asshole chanting Vt song" doesn't interest me sorry
Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:08 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:55 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Interesting response from across the pond
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:29 pm
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:38 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:scott_w_ccfc wrote:The ONLY way we are going to get our identity back is if Tan leaves. End of story.
Those who want Tan to stay AND our identity back have to decide which they want more because, unfortunately, both aren't glor=#4000BF]
I dont disagree with that Chief unfortunately that is bang on.
And I have to say the " no one wants to be red" bit IMO is miles off. There are plenty that like the red or even love the red. If you have bought the red kit you have embrased the red.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:50 pm
redordead wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:scott_w_ccfc wrote:The ONLY way we are going to get our identity back is if Tan leaves. End of story.
Those who want Tan to stay AND our identity back have to decide which they want more because, unfortunately, both aren't glor=#4000BF]
I dont disagree with that Chief unfortunately that is bang on.
And I have to say the " no one wants to be red" bit IMO is miles off. There are plenty that like the red or even love the red. If you have bought the red kit you have embrased the red.
i also think a lot of fans just want to watch the football and couldn't give a shit what colour we played in.
Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:55 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:redordead wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:scott_w_ccfc wrote:The ONLY way we are going to get our identity back is if Tan leaves. End of story.
Those who want Tan to stay AND our identity back have to decide which they want more because, unfortunately, both aren't glor=#4000BF]
I dont disagree with that Chief unfortunately that is bang on.
And I have to say the " no one wants to be red" bit IMO is miles off. There are plenty that like the red or even love the red. If you have bought the red kit you have embrased the red.
i also think a lot of fans just want to watch the football and couldn't give a shit what colour we played in.
Again I think you are right there are many that dont give a shit as long as we stay in the Prem. Do you agree with that Chief. That is the success before colour. Or is it colour before success ? Hmmmm