Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:40 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:56 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:58 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:00 pm
TripleD wrote:They will just come one here saying they can't help what others say etc..
I thought the site vetted comments too?
BU failed. Tan out failed. This is a new angle, a new protest, but the same old idiots will ruin it.
Feel for the people that have worked hard to put this together when it inevitably fails in a week..
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:00 pm
CantonJack wrote:Why shouldn't they be allowed on the march? It's not as if anyone can stop you walking with a large group of people.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:01 pm
Pac Man wrote:TripleD wrote:They will just come one here saying they can't help what others say etc..
I thought the site vetted comments too?
BU failed. Tan out failed. This is a new angle, a new protest, but the same old idiots will ruin it.
Feel for the people that have worked hard to put this together when it inevitably fails in a week..
i hope their not allowed to spoil the day.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:01 pm
TripleD wrote:CantonJack wrote:Why shouldn't they be allowed on the march? It's not as if anyone can stop you walking with a large group of people.
Because it is not a march for reasons they believe in, it's a march for blue not tan out. Tan out and bu failed.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:08 pm
CantonJack wrote:TripleD wrote:CantonJack wrote:Why shouldn't they be allowed on the march? It's not as if anyone can stop you walking with a large group of people.
Because it is not a march for reasons they believe in, it's a march for blue not tan out. Tan out and bu failed.
So they don't want blue back?
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:08 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:09 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:10 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Mind your own
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:12 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Mind your own
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:13 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Mind your own
Always the voice of sense whether it affects me directly or not
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:15 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:15 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:17 pm
CantonJack wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Mind your own
He has a point though. We'll never be blue under Tan so in theory it is a Tan Out March.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:19 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:21 pm
TripleD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Just come on here and stick to non rebrand threads, you obviously know whatever you say on this type of thread will rub people up the wrong way and that's the reason you poke your nose in for a cheap thrill.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:24 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:TripleD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Just come on here and stick to non rebrand threads, you obviously know whatever you say on this type of thread will rub people up the wrong way and that's the reason you poke your nose in for a cheap thrill.
I will post on anything I wish, when has fear of rubbing people up the wrong way ever stopped me posting the truth.
The fact is you cant really have a march for blue and want to keep Tan in.
Its like marching against racism while wanting Hitler in charge,
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:31 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:32 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:TripleD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Just come on here and stick to non rebrand threads, you obviously know whatever you say on this type of thread will rub people up the wrong way and that's the reason you poke your nose in for a cheap thrill.
I will post on anything I wish, when has fear of rubbing people up the wrong way ever stopped me posting the truth.
The fact is you cant really have a march for blue and want to keep Tan in.
Its like marching against racism while wanting Hitler in charge,
Dont be so f*cking stupid
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:36 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:39 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:TripleD wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:If you want blue back then it must be tan out surely?![]()
Which part of "we will never be blue while im owner" has confused people?
Just come on here and stick to non rebrand threads, you obviously know whatever you say on this type of thread will rub people up the wrong way and that's the reason you poke your nose in for a cheap thrill.
I will post on anything I wish, when has fear of rubbing people up the wrong way ever stopped me posting the truth.
The fact is you cant really have a march for blue and want to keep Tan in.
Its like marching against racism while wanting Hitler in charge,
Dont be so f*cking stupid
So you cant see the similarities in marching for an ideology while wanting to keep a dictator that has the opposite one?
Could your head be buried in any more sand?
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:44 pm
RayHorn wrote:By using the phrase dictator you just made your stand pretty clear haven`t you? No much sense in debating any more..
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:51 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:RayHorn wrote:By using the phrase dictator you just made your stand pretty clear haven`t you? No much sense in debating any more..
Dic-ta-tor
1.
a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession.
You think he is a democratic owner then?![]()
Please, go on....
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:52 pm
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I'm surprised the people organising this March mentioned BU as one of organisation joining them. They lost credibility instantly.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:52 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I'm surprised the people organising this March mentioned BU as one of organisation joining them. They lost credibility instantly.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:55 pm
JonCCFC wrote:The fact that BU want blue back and Tan out doesn't make a difference. This march is a pro-blue march, everyone knows this, so EVERYONE who wants blue back is welcome. I'm going on the march and I also want Tan out, but that doesn't mean I'm going to start shouting abuse towards Tan. There's so much ignorance in this thread.
Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:00 pm
RayHorn wrote:
What are you saying? Dictator and owner is the same term? So calling the owner a dictator does not imply the owner of being
abusive of human rights, workers rights and doing business beside the law? Please, go on..