Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:51 am

Lets take tan to court for changing our colour,it may not work but the publicity would kill him.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:52 am

Mr Green wrote:Lets take tan to court for changing our colour,it may not work but the publicity would kill him.


:lol: on what grounds ?

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:53 am

Holy shit! Ive heard some fucked up things on here but that takes the piss!

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:55 am

I'm sure we could think of something.
The point is the negative publicity and embarrassment world wide it would give him would be enormous.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 9:59 am

Fans weren't consulted about the changes,there's one reason.

Craig your a nob and a yes man

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:01 am

How can you sue a business man for changing his business you absolute clown!

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:04 am

CraigCCFC wrote:How can you sue a business man for changing his business you absolute clown!

i don't want to sue him. :thumbup:nob

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:06 am

Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:How can you sue a business man for changing his business you absolute clown!

i don't want to sue him. :thumbup:nob

So how do you propose on taking him to court then dummy?just asking him to turn up?

Please research before posting tripe

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:08 am

There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:09 am

This thread has made me smile lol off to get ready for the football now lol

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:11 am

Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:11 am

JONNY012697 wrote:This thread has made me smile lol off to get ready for the football now lol

And me, see you in court .

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:13 am

CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:13 am

Mr Green wrote:Fans weren't consulted about the changes,there's one reason.

Craig your a nob and a yes man


Good point didn't think of that :ayatollah:

Whilst I'm at it I will take mars to court as well for changing the marathon bar name to snickers , still fuming over that I spent a fortune on that product without being told of the rebrand :(

Don't even get me started on Starbucks changing the colour of their badge from green to black :lol:

We will be millionaires when we win all these cases :ayatollah: lets do it :ayatollah: :lol:

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:14 am

Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Right, so what are the grounds for legal action??
Not liking a colour is not a viable proceeding for court action.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:15 am

thomasblue wrote:
Mr Green wrote:Fans weren't consulted about the changes,there's one reason.

Craig your a nob and a yes man


Good point didn't think of that :ayatollah:

Whilst I'm at it I will take mars to court as well for changing the marathon bar name to snickers , still fuming over that I spent a fortune on that product without being told of the rebrand :(

Don't even get me started on Starbucks changing the colour of their badge from green to black :lol:

We will be millionaires when we win all these cases :ayatollah: lets do it :ayatollah: :lol:

it's not about money,you don't get it,it's about embarrassing vt.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:16 am

CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:How can you sue a business man for changing his business you absolute clown!

i don't want to sue him. :thumbup:nob

So how do you propose on taking him to court then dummy?just asking him to turn up?

Please research before posting tripe

Chill out :thumbup:

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:17 am

CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Right, so what are the grounds for legal action??
Not liking a colour is not a viable proceeding for court action.

changing 100 years of identity without fans consultation is. :thumbup:

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:17 am

Willo Cardiff wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:How can you sue a business man for changing his business you absolute clown!

i don't want to sue him. :thumbup:nob

So how do you propose on taking him to court then dummy?just asking him to turn up?

Please research before posting tripe

Chill out :thumbup:

I am chilled. This Mr Green guy is a right wolly

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:18 am

Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Right, so what are the grounds for legal action??
Not liking a colour is not a viable proceeding for court action.

changing 100 years of identity without fans consultation is. :thumbup:

I hate to break this to you, but no its not lol

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:19 am

Mr Green wrote:Lets take tan to court for changing our colour,it may not work but the publicity would kill him.

Ok . Thats a great idea. Need your address though to send the bill. OK :thumbup:

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:22 am

I've heard some stupid shit on here but this tops it

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:25 am

CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Right, so what are the grounds for legal action??
Not liking a colour is not a viable proceeding for court action.

changing 100 years of identity without fans consultation is. :thumbup:

I hate to break this to you, but no its not lol

yes it is.
and willo right chill out your overheating.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:26 am

Im very chilled, just sat here laughing at you

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:26 am

Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
CraigCCFC wrote:
Mr Green wrote:There's plenty of reasons to take people to court,this one is because of the colour change.Think before give your negative view.

So what grounds have you got?
That you dont like the colour scheme a business owner chose for his business. What right have you got over the choice of colour?

Its not being negative, its being realistic and not living on planet cuckoo.

protest, boycott is the only hope there is.

Yes the colour,100 years of identity,that's plenty.

Right, so what are the grounds for legal action??
Not liking a colour is not a viable proceeding for court action.

changing 100 years of identity without fans consultation is. :thumbup:

I hate to break this to you, but no its not lol

yes it is.
and willo right chill out your overheating.


It really isn't

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:29 am

CraigCCFC wrote:Im very chilled, just sat here laughing at you

with a pie in one hand and a soft drink in the other,operating your keyboard with your toes,very clever.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:35 am

Mr Green you do know the costs of all this do you..?

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:41 am

I'm very well off junta,cash is not a problem.

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:43 am

Military Junta wrote:Mr Green you do know the costs of all this do you..?



Good point Adam but this character will probably suggest we all put a few quid in a pot to play the lawyers.

:lol: :lol:

Re: TAN TO COURT

Sat Feb 22, 2014 10:44 am

Mr. Green ...... Most ridiculous post of 2014.