Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:16 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:18 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:20 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:22 pm
Castro wrote:I want to win the league.
However - some things just aren't realistically possible. Best of luck to the young fella though.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:23 pm
Castro wrote:I want to win the league.
However - some things just aren't realistically possible. Best of luck to the young fella though.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:26 pm
ianmackay88 wrote:Castro wrote:I want to win the league.
However - some things just aren't realistically possible. Best of luck to the young fella though.
We're 3 points behind, hardly a mountain to climb
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:30 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:32 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:How long does it take you to currently earn 4 points?
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:32 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:33 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:I love it when he quotes statistics! He sounds so desperate!
Solskjaer may have them worried already!
Positive man, positive attitude, positive effect on our levels of performance and points total.
Onwards and upwards!
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:37 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:38 pm
paulh_85 wrote:cant fault the positivity but would be happy just to stay up right about now.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:38 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:45 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:What facts? The ones you chose to relate too! How many points you collected in the last 6 games?
the facts regarding how many points we pick up per game - keep up son. the league so far shows a perfect spectrum of teams played. Why choose the last 6 as it doesnt show a fair representation of the average quality we will face. We will not play Man City, Chelsea, Everton every 6 game block.
Or do we have to chose all your games irrelevant of current form!
we decide the points tally on what we HAVE achieved not what we may.
Perhaps we should go back to last season, as that was the true indicator of your performance!
it was a different league with different personnel - new username but same silly arguments it seems.
Couldn't make it up
you do - often.
Your Spanish defenders didn't look too keen to defend for their lives yesterday! Angel and Chico already waving the white flag! Such an appropriate colour.
I don't even know what this means or what it has to do with the thread. Christ you are odd![]()
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:52 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:56 pm
d20 wrote:1-0 NOW f**k OFF !!
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:05 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:05 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:12 pm
GENERAL CHAT wrote:Castro wrote:
we decide the points tally on what we HAVE achieved not what we may.
So basicly, you cannot say you're on course for a midtable finish then.(like you have been predicting)![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:12 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:14 pm
Castro wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Castro wrote:
we decide the points tally on what we HAVE achieved not what we may.
So basicly, you cannot say you're on course for a midtable finish then.(like you have been predicting)![]()
![]()
![]()
Im not a psychic, never claimed to be.
However the most accurate guess is based on relative data, the more data, the more likely the positive accuracy of the prediction.
So far we have played 20 - which covers every team and style the league has to offer. This is a far better tool than hand picking 6 games which dont even cover a third of the teams we will face
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:18 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You have to be amazed by Castro's creative use of mathematics.
nothing creative just facts Martyn.
Note that it takes us nearly 5 games to achieve 4 points but it takes Swansea 3.7 games![]()
indeed. Or nearly 4 if you want to match the terms, however you asked me specifically so thought you wanted a specific answer. However not sure if you have noticed but nearly 4 is less than nearly 5 anyway![]()
In fact if you calculate it it takes us on average this season, over the whole season, 4.4 games to achieve 4 points! It takes Swansea Town 3.8 games.
so we gain points at a faster rate clever clogs![]()
The school I went to, admittedly along time ago, never suggested that a decimal equivalent to less than half should ever be rounded up to 5.
of course it should be. You dont get awarded points 0.4 the way through a match. Even if it was 4.0001 games - it woukd still take 5 to achieve them. It seems school certainly is a distant memory![]()
Then again Castro insists 13 is less tan 10.
dont think i ever have Martyn. Not like you to make things up![]()
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:20 pm
GENERAL CHAT wrote:
However....we decide the points tally on what we HAVE achieved not what we may.
Sorted.
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:21 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:23 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:23 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:Want to borrow my calculator ?
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:24 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:Creativity suggests you distorted the mathematically correct answers to prove a point that they did not truly indicate!
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:29 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:33 pm
Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:33 pm
Ian Gibson's bookie wrote:You said nearly 5, incorrect!
nearly 5 is correct. As ive explained to you Martyn, you dont get awarded points after 0.4 of a match. In order to get the sufficient points it would be 5 games![]()
You said 3.7 not me, I said categorically 3.8
i said "3.7 roughly" did I not? I didnt think anyone would be insane enough to cry over 0.1 of a quick tally which changes nothing to the point in hand![]()
Time will tell!
Hint you should watch your defenders body language carefully, irrelevant I know but so satisfying to us capital city fans.
says the man who supports a club that has conceded 32 goals so far![]()