Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:26 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:29 pm
Willy-Wonka wrote:Not being funny but I fkin hate the unions.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:37 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:39 pm
Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:42 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
What utter ignorance.
So they should retire at 65 like the rest of us then.......hope you or your kids arent in a fire a have 64 yr old pensioner scale a ladder to try and rescue you.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:44 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:45 pm
Hawkeye wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
What utter ignorance.
So they should retire at 65 like the rest of us then.......hope you or your kids arent in a fire a have 64 yr old pensioner scale a ladder to try and rescue you.
They have to keep themselves fit or face the sack,they've had it easy to long.
Shape up or ship out.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:46 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Hawkeye wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
What utter ignorance.
So they should retire at 65 like the rest of us then.......hope you or your kids arent in a fire a have 64 yr old pensioner scale a ladder to try and rescue you.
They have to keep themselves fit or face the sack,they've had it easy to long.
Shape up or ship out.
Age catches up with everyone.
Your an utter fool mate fairplay.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 5:57 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:05 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:09 pm
Hawkeye wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
sleeping through their night shift should stop,can't believe they get away with it.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:10 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:13 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:Hawkeye wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
sleeping through their night shift should stop,can't believe they get away with it.
I wasnt aware they do, not what advantage there is to that really.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:23 pm
Willy-Wonka wrote:Not being funny but I fkin hate the unions.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:26 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Hawkeye wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
sleeping through their night shift should stop,can't believe they get away with it.
I wasnt aware they do, not what advantage there is to that really.
They work 15hr nightshifts and have lay down period between midnight and 6am.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:37 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Hawkeye wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
sleeping through their night shift should stop,can't believe they get away with it.
I wasnt aware they do, not what advantage there is to that really.
They work 15hr nightshifts and have lay down period between midnight and 6am.
thats nice for them
join the mechant navy as a deck hand one of the hardest and dangerous jobs this country can offer and then discover a fire on board doesnt matter how tired you are or how long your shift has been or whether youve slept, you fight that fire or you die and nobodies coming to save you, oh and your 65 years of age. Maybe the fire service should have a rethink of their actions.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:45 pm
Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 6:56 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Hawkeye wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Yes and No on this one
as an emergency service you expect them to be fit anyway and age does have a factor on this
however I believe its down to an individual firefighters to maintain fitness like the military and there is no union protecting our armed forces, so the fire service have an advantage.
Merchant Navy sailors work until they are 65 and firefighting is a required duty so if they can fight fires at sea at 65 why cant the fire service.
Each to their own if they think they can get something out of it good luck to them
sleeping through their night shift should stop,can't believe they get away with it.
I wasnt aware they do, not what advantage there is to that really.
They work 15hr nightshifts and have lay down period between midnight and 6am.
thats nice for them
join the mechant navy as a deck hand one of the hardest and dangerous jobs this country can offer and then discover a fire on board doesnt matter how tired you are or how long your shift has been or whether youve slept, you fight that fire or you die and nobodies coming to save you, oh and your 65 years of age. Maybe the fire service should have a rethink of their actions.
My father was in the merchant Navy for 9 years, then was a firefighter for the rest of his career. Ask him........
A fire on a boat is rare..........
Firefighters run into burning buildings every day risking their lives for other peoples lives and property..........for a starting salary of £21k per annum. .shame on them.
Some people are just dull as f**k.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 7:10 pm
Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
I've worked sleeping nights...so your wrong my friend.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:47 pm
Hawkeye wrote:Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
I've worked sleeping nights...so your wrong my friend.
i don't think i am,i can't think of any other job that pays you to sleep.
Name the job you had that payed you to sleep.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:57 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:58 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:10 pm
Hawkeye wrote:I've worked 12 hour nights and never been offered a lay down ffs.
Payed for sleeping what a disgrace.
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:13 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Do firefighters really risk their lives every day?
Do they run into burning buildings?
Maybe on tv
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:22 pm
Dylanthomas wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Do firefighters really risk their lives every day?
Do they run into burning buildings?
Maybe on tv
Try being one and you'll see stupid question anyway
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:29 pm
Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:39 pm
Hawkeye wrote:Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:Hawkeye wrote:I don't know any other job where if your doing a night shift you go to bed.
And why should they retire in their fifty's.
I've worked sleeping nights...so your wrong my friend.
i don't think i am,i can't think of any other job that pays you to sleep.
Name the job you had that payed you to sleep.
Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:03 am
Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:24 am
Tue Dec 17, 2013 12:47 am
Denzil wrote:Willy-Wonka wrote:Not being funny but I fkin hate the unions.
Read the history books my friend and try and educate yourself.Go to the local library if your short of cash.....the unions especially the miners paid for the first ones.....have a look where all your holidays.....weekends off.....pay rises....employment rights.....health and safety regulations.....pensions....maternity rights.....equal pay....etc etc etc have come from.Do you honestly think business and owners gave us them things....they were fought for by our forefathers...in strikes and hardship, over many years.People like my grandfather spent 7 months on strike so people like you could have a decent life, so dont ever forget it.Educate yourself.