Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:50 pm
Sat Nov 23, 2013 11:57 pm
hillbillyblue wrote:Got hammered n still chats shite. Wha a wanka!!!!!!!
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:03 am
hillbillyblue wrote:Got hammered n still chats shite. Wha a wanka!!!!!!!
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:04 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:04 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:12 am
hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:13 am
llan bluebird wrote:Tough as teak though......
Froch won't go near him again. Maybe time to retire
Calzaghe would have toyed with him
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:16 am
jtc wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Tough as teak though......
Froch won't go near him again. Maybe time to retire
Calzaghe would have toyed with him
prob right.the way froch fights there was always going to be a time when it caught up with him.groves is a better boxer.froch has a year max.if you were froch would you have a rematch ?he don,t need the dollar.andre ward outclassed him before -maybe he has a punchers chance and he wouldnt get hurt by ward.or do you go for a man like kessler?finish the career with a fighter made for his style?groves will not get his rematch imo.
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:16 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:17 am
JONNY012697 wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
why?
Froch would have won that round even if it wasnt stopped and on the score card he was 1 point behind so the round win would have evened up the score card. Froch was getting stronger in the fight which was evident when Groves dropped his guard in round 6. The referee is one of the best, you can say the fight was ended too early but another punch from Froch could have seriously injured Groves he was wobbling and his defence was non-existent at the time.
However Groves had an amazing fight and shown he can fight with the best and I see a very bright future for the lad and he will have those titles sooner rather than later
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:17 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:19 am
jtc wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Got hammered n still chats shite. Wha a wanka!!!!!!!
and still world champion.most blokes would have thrown the towel in after what he took (according to 5live).credit to froch for digging in.george groves day will came
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:19 am
hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:20 am
Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
why?
Froch would have won that round even if it wasnt stopped and on the score card he was 1 point behind so the round win would have evened up the score card. Froch was getting stronger in the fight which was evident when Groves dropped his guard in round 6. The referee is one of the best, you can say the fight was ended too early but another punch from Froch could have seriously injured Groves he was wobbling and his defence was non-existent at the time.
However Groves had an amazing fight and shown he can fight with the best and I see a very bright future for the lad and he will have those titles sooner rather than later
You could have said the same when groves dropped him in the first round though......another corrupt fight night.
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:23 am
hillbillyblue wrote:jtc wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Got hammered n still chats shite. Wha a wanka!!!!!!!
and still world champion.most blokes would have thrown the towel in after what he took (according to 5live).credit to froch for digging in.george groves day will came
Neva mind 5 live. Watch fight it's cruel not only to George but ALSo to every1 who bet him. Glad I didn't go thro wif the nifty on him. Had the fight of his life and froch won't rematch
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:26 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:26 am
JONNY012697 wrote:Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
why?
Froch would have won that round even if it wasnt stopped and on the score card he was 1 point behind so the round win would have evened up the score card. Froch was getting stronger in the fight which was evident when Groves dropped his guard in round 6. The referee is one of the best, you can say the fight was ended too early but another punch from Froch could have seriously injured Groves he was wobbling and his defence was non-existent at the time.
However Groves had an amazing fight and shown he can fight with the best and I see a very bright future for the lad and he will have those titles sooner rather than later
You could have said the same when groves dropped him in the first round though......another corrupt fight night.
not really it was the first round and Froch had to stand for the 10 count, nothing corrupt about it IMO Froch had that fight in the bag from round 6 onwards, Groves relied on punishing him early (which he was somewhat successful at doing) it tired him out and Froch's recovery and experience took over
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:31 am
citybluechris wrote:I wanted stay a neutral fan because I am a big fan of both froch and groves, but this result as left a bitter taste, I cant argue with fact froch was coming on strong and could of got the stoppage but groves deserved not to be stopped like that, that's worse than the first enzo mac v McKenzie fight. the way froch acted was the biggest disappointment for me though, could tell groves tried to say sorry for build up no hard feelings but froch wanted none of it and gave him a f*cking lecture on respect and don't give me wrong I hate trash talking before fights but after the fight is over it should be left alone but froch came across as a bit of a prick and that's not easy for me to say
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:31 am
jtc wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
do you remember eubank v watson?watson prob 6 or more rounds up,knocks eubank down who then got up and returned the knockdown.watson was allowed to box on.how much damage that caused is open to debate but the result was michael watson in a wheelchair.do you want to see that happen again?
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:38 am
hillbillyblue wrote:jtc wrote:hillbillyblue wrote:Bad referee big time. froch put on ass in 1st round battered for 8 rounds then has 1 outburst and the wanka stops it. Big injustice no way deserved the win
do you remember eubank v watson?watson prob 6 or more rounds up,knocks eubank down who then got up and returned the knockdown.watson was allowed to box on.how much damage that caused is open to debate but the result was michael watson in a wheelchair.do you want to see that happen again?
It's a world championship fight a lot at stake nobody wants to see anybody seriously injured but it was plain to see tha waz a fair way off when stopped it waz a clear farce mate. End of.
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:38 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:38 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:42 am
englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:45 am
citybluechris wrote:I wanted stay a neutral fan because I am a big fan of both froch and groves, but this result as left a bitter taste, I cant argue with fact froch was coming on strong and could of got the stoppage but groves deserved not to be stopped like that, that's worse than the first enzo mac v McKenzie fight. the way froch acted was the biggest disappointment for me though, could tell groves tried to say sorry for build up no hard feelings but froch wanted none of it and gave him a f*cking lecture on respect and don't give me wrong I hate trash talking before fights but after the fight is over it should be left alone but froch came across as a bit of a prick and that's not easy for me to say
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:45 am
englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:47 am
jtc wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
it was win win for the welsh nationalists tho...two englishmen knocking seven bells out of each other
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:47 am
englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:52 am
NJ73 wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
Absolutely. Groves should have been 6 points up after the first 5 rounds and there was nothing between them for the others.
Boxing stinks.
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:53 am
Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:53 am
englishbluebird wrote:jtc wrote:englishbluebird wrote:Terrible officiating but not frochs fault. Groves showed his inexperience at top level
scoring that fight 76-75 which presumably if the judges knew the rules included a 10-8 round for groves was scandolous
it was win win for the welsh nationalists tho...two englishmen knocking seven bells out of each other
![]()
and seeing a cockney in tears at the end.. seriously though really felt for the lad.He was robbed