Tans "Iffy" CV

Maybe a CRB check should have been done?
http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogs ... -what.html

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Maybe a CRB check should have been done?
http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogs ... -what.html

I know I'm gonna rattle your anti-Tan cage but could you explain what the document you've just posted is about.C'mon give us a clue what they are on about.I've just read it and was disappointed that although Tans name was mentioned twice it was a critique of some other geezer.Perhaps you could explain how this means Tan CV is iffy as its obviously above my head and there must be some secret code that only people with a grudge against Tan can understand.I will re-read it again but perhaps you will understand if I leave it until bed time as I do have a bit of trouble getting off and this will help.

Did you read it yourself.

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

Strange man.

To me it just seems iffy, Just my view maybe I AM biased. im certainly not apologising.

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

Strange man.

There's no need for you to be so honest and own up to it!

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

Strange man.

There's no need for you to be so honest and own up to it!

Don't be so upset that you were proved wrong.

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

Strange man.

There's no need for you to be so honest and own up to it!

Don't be so upset that you were proved wrong.

I wasn't wrong about anything Barbara, my post was intended to catch a sprat and it's no contest in getting you to bite!

I wasn't wrong about anything Barbara, my post was intended to catch a sprat and it's no contest in getting you to bite!

You were. I found nothing against Tan in that article. That old "fishing for bites" excuse when someone is proved wrong though..

I might be missing something but theres nothing bad about Tan in the article

I know somebody who'd find something bad in it, but don't "Chuckle!"

Don't need to look to find any bad Tan decisions, enough already in his tenure at Cardiff City... Though I struggle to see the relevance of this article to Tan.

If you were a fish you'd be supper!

Strange man.

There's no need for you to be so honest and own up to it!

Don't be so upset that you were proved wrong.

I wasn't wrong about anything Barbara, my post was intended to catch a Prat and it's no contest in getting you to bite!

Sorry for my typo earlier, but I was in a hurry as I had to go to work!

As I said, that dismal excuse of "looking for bites" is only used when someone has been proved wrong.

As I said, that dismal excuse of "looking for bites" is only used when someone has been proved wrong.

About time you had a sex change, so you can become a man!

To me it just seems iffy, Just my view maybe I AM biased. im certainly not apologising.

Of course it's iffy.

No one's ever become a Billionaire without some dodgy dealings going on.

As I said, that dismal excuse of "looking for bites" is only used when someone has been proved wrong.

About time you had a sex change, so you can become a man!

Your posts are getting even more odd... don't worry about being wrong!

As I said, that dismal excuse of "looking for bites" is only used when someone has been proved wrong.

About time you had a sex change, so you can become a man!

Your posts are getting even more odd... don't worry about being wrong!

Just because you said you couldn't find anything to have a go at VT, doesn't mean to say that you didn't Barbara!

Let's be honest here, you could find fault in anything and even cause a row in an empty house!

In short you're a pretty poor excuse for a human being, especially when you can't even stop yourself from posting shit in probably the most sobering thread on this message board (viewtopic.php?f=2&t=127288), merely to reiterate what you've spouted at least a Billion times before!

Grow up FFS, we all know you don't like Tan and the rebrand, get a Fecking life!

Just because you said you couldn't find anything to have a go at VT, doesn't mean to say that you didn't Barbara!

Let's be honest here, you could find fault in anything and even cause a row in an empty house!

In short you're a pretty poor excuse for a human being, especially when you can't even stop yourself from posting shit in probably the most sobering thread on this message board (viewtopic.php?f=2&t=127288), merely to reiterate what you've spouted at least a Billion times before!

Grow up FFS, we all know you don't like Tan and the rebrand, get a Fecking life!

You got it wrong. chin up Deirdre.

Not posting shit, just didn't see why someone felt the need to compare what was posted with the rebrand, just because it suited their agenda.. I'd say that was much lower Deirdre.

Just because you said you couldn't find anything to have a go at VT, doesn't mean to say that you didn't Barbara!

Let's be honest here, you could find fault in anything and even cause a row in an empty house!

In short you're a pretty poor excuse for a human being, especially when you can't even stop yourself from posting shit in probably the most sobering thread on this message board (viewtopic.php?f=2&t=127288), merely to reiterate what you've spouted at least a Billion times before!

Grow up FFS, we all know you don't like Tan and the rebrand, get a Fecking life!

You got it wrong. chin up Deirdre.

Not posting shit, just didn't see why someone felt the need to compare what was posted with the rebrand, just because it suited their agenda.. I'd say that was much lower Deirdre.

You just couldn't help yourself (Must be your female hormones) and had TLG or Elyboy posted the same as Shinobipony, you wouldn't have replied!

You're a Fecking low life and it's about time you grew a pair of bollocks!

You just couldn't help yourself (Must be your female hormones) and had TLG or Elyboy posted the same as Shinobipony, you wouldn't have replied!

You're a Fecking low life and it's about time you grew a pair of bollocks!

You're making more assumptions, these ones are wrong too (you're making quite a habit of that!)

I'm a low life for having an opinion? I'd say someone using that terrible tragedy to push their view of the rebrand across was far worse... Hence my post. All about opinions.

You just couldn't help yourself (Must be your female hormones) and had TLG or Elyboy posted the same as Shinobipony, you wouldn't have replied!

You're a Fecking low life and it's about time you grew a pair of bollocks!

You're making more assumptions, these ones are wrong too (you're making quite a habit of that!)

I'm a low life for having an opinion? I'd say someone using that terrible tragedy to push their view of the rebrand across was far worse... Hence my post. All about opinions.

You're a low life for trying to point score in an extremely serious thread!

As I said, you've made your point at least a Billion times before, so it was completely unnecessary, but you just can't help yourself!

Chuckle bunny will never get flooded thats for sure, with that moral high ground he thinks he is on.

You're a low life for trying to point score in an extremely serious thread!

As I said, you've made your point at least a Billion times before, so it was completely unnecessary, but you just can't help yourself!

More incorrect assumptions. I gave my opinion that the comparison made was completely inappropriate.

I can make my point as many times as I like. Didn't realise you were the one in charge of setting a limit!

You're a low life for trying to point score in an extremely serious thread!

As I said, you've made your point at least a Billion times before, so it was completely unnecessary, but you just can't help yourself!

More incorrect assumptions. I gave my opinion that the comparison made was completely inappropriate.

And the point that I was making, was that there was no need for you to give that opinion in that particular very serious thread, especially when you've posted it in every other Fecking thread!

You're a low life for trying to point score in an extremely serious thread!

As I said, you've made your point at least a Billion times before, so it was completely unnecessary, but you just can't help yourself!

I can make my point as many times as I like. Didn't realise you were the one in charge of setting a limit!

Surely even somebody as dull as you can realise that there was no need to flog a dead horse and that you could post your utter disdain for the re-brand, another Billion times in every other less serious thread!

In your opinion. Whereas I felt that I had to comment that someone was using that tragic event to get their views of the rebrand across. I don't need your permission to do that.

In fact, I didn't even post an opinion on the rebrand in that thread, I just questioned why that person felt the need to bring it up... You'd see that if you read it correctly.

In your opinion. Whereas I felt that I had to comment that someone was using that tragic event to get their views of the rebrand across. I don't need your permission to do that.

In fact, I didn't even post an opinion on the rebrand in that thread, I just questioned why that person felt the need to bring it up... You'd see that if you read it correctly.

Everybody knows why you jumped on Shinobipony's post, it's not the first time, so cut the bullshit, you can't help yourself!

Everybody knows why you jumped on Shinobipony's post, it's not the first time, so cut the bullshit, you can't help yourself!

I've already explained why... Disgusting trying to use that tragedy to play down the rebrand.

Have you accepted that I didn't actually use it to post my opinion at all & that you were wrong to say that?

Everybody knows why you jumped on Shinobipony's post, it's not the first time, so cut the bullshit, you can't help yourself!

I've already explained why... Disgusting trying to use that tragedy to play down the rebrand.

I wasn't playing down anything, I've played up the fact that you chose to post your incessant trolling on Shinobipony, in such a serious thread!

I wasn't playing down anything, I've played up the fact that you chose to post your incessant trolling on Shinobipony, in such a serious thread!

I wasn't on about you.

No trolling of anyone; just posting of opinions. Why do you label people who have differing opinions trolls? If anyone is a troll; it's you in this thread. Unnecessary abuse to take the topic totally off track.