Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:02 pm
Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:06 pm
Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:10 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:12 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:21 pm
carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:24 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
Which is even more worrying. He wouldnt have to shoulder any blame as we would all blame Tan
Sun Oct 20, 2013 11:12 pm
carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:01 am
carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:37 am
Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:48 am
Fairwater Youth wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
He didn't consult the fans over the change of badge he just did it
Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:51 am
Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:17 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Watched the full interview on Sport Wales on Friday night and its crystal clear Sam is firmly in the VT camp.
He more or less condoned VT getting involved in the football side of things. Hardly suprising as he was an owner who meddled in the team hence he put yes men in charge like Alan Cork and Lennie Lawrence.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:18 am
Jinks wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Watched the full interview on Sport Wales on Friday night and its crystal clear Sam is firmly in the VT camp.
He more or less condoned VT getting involved in the football side of things. Hardly suprising as he was an owner who meddled in the team hence he put yes men in charge like Alan Cork and Lennie Lawrence.
That was ok as it was classed as passion then
Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:39 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Jinks wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Watched the full interview on Sport Wales on Friday night and its crystal clear Sam is firmly in the VT camp.
He more or less condoned VT getting involved in the football side of things. Hardly suprising as he was an owner who meddled in the team hence he put yes men in charge like Alan Cork and Lennie Lawrence.
That was ok as it was classed as passion then
its his money, he can do as he wants, oh hang ona minute it wasnt his money....
I thought he only made mistakes
Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:51 pm
Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:58 pm
carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:02 pm
2blue2handle wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
I agree Carl but if he thought he could have he would have, he wanted Wales all to support one team so our current badge is very fitting to what he wanted at the time.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:02 pm
Mon Oct 21, 2013 3:45 pm
underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:16 pm
2blue2handle wrote:carlccfc wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:The same Sam that changed our badge and wanted to change us to bloody green?
Craig I know you are no supporter of Sam but with his desire to change our kit and badge he consulted the fans and listened to the opinions and didn't change the colour because of the fans.
I agree Carl but if he thought he could have he would have, he wanted Wales all to support one team so our current badge is very fitting to what he wanted at the time.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:52 pm
Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:15 pm
underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:19 pm
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:29 pm
Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:37 pm
underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
That and the whole fiasco over the last week, the meddling cant be good can it.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:43 pm
BLUE DYNAMITE wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
That and the whole fiasco over the last week, the meddling cant be good can it.
Init bed tym in kweenz land
evun a dulard lyk mee noz yor rowthi shhhit sturin.
now doo 1
Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:54 pm
Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:11 pm
underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
That and the whole fiasco over the last week, the meddling cant be good can it.
Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:22 pm
Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
That and the whole fiasco over the last week, the meddling cant be good can it.
I don't read or believe gash newspaper reports posted on here by posters who believe the crap because its against Tan and not because its true..
If it comes from the club fair enough if not i'll take all these stories with a pinch of salt
Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:29 am
underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Jinks wrote:underthebridge47 wrote:Don't people get bored of posting this kind of stuff?
No obviously not
I posted this on another thread..Man United have 200,000 members in a group to get the Glazer family out, they hope to go worldwide, they are organised and have done some good things. Makes BU look small time and really badly organised (not having a dig at bu before anyone cyber bashes me) but even with all this, the Glazers don't seem bothered by them or threatened.
If they can't do it, it shows we have absolutely no hope in hell with a smaller group and a few thousand names on paper.
Uniteds "owner out" group are far bigger, better and more organised than our, smaller less professional effort, and they are fighting a losing battle, so we have no chance. Sooner people realise that, the better.
*edit, added link.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... up-6189680?
Other than the rebrand i am happy with VT our club..
That and the whole fiasco over the last week, the meddling cant be good can it.
I don't read or believe gash newspaper reports posted on here by posters who believe the crap because its against Tan and not because its true..
If it comes from the club fair enough if not i'll take all these stories with a pinch of salt
Where am i against anyone?
that story is full of facts.