Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:44 am
Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:10 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:21 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 7:59 pm
Zeb Colter wrote:Well I wouldn't want him applying for the new head of recruitment role. You know the guy who spent 20m on Henderson, 15m on Downing, 35m on Carroll.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Mynachdy_Bluebird wrote:Tan should take note.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:17 pm
Zeb Colter wrote:Well I wouldn't want him applying for the new head of recruitment role. You know the guy who spent 20m on Henderson, 15m on Downing, 35m on Carroll.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:21 pm
Zeb Colter wrote:Well I wouldn't want him applying for the new head of recruitment role. You know the guy who spent 20m on Henderson, 15m on Downing, 35m on Carroll.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:38 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 8:43 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:Completely off thread but Susanna Reid's bangers tonight on Strictly were truly things of beauty. She also has a 'pear' shaped bottom. And I love pears.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:58 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Completely off thread but Susanna Reid's bangers tonight on Strictly were truly things of beauty. She also has a 'pear' shaped bottom. And I love pears.
Shes no Tess Daley
Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:44 pm
Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:55 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Completely off thread but Susanna Reid's bangers tonight on Strictly were truly things of beauty. She also has a 'pear' shaped bottom. And I love pears.
Shes no Tess Daley
Your right mate. Tess Daley would suck on my ball-sack as I muntered Reid's clacker before finally man-fatting on Darcy Busells pip-tits. Bruce would then shout 'Good Game' as I insulted the poofs while wiping my cock on Len's dressing room curtains. 'Seven!'.
Sat Oct 12, 2013 11:25 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Completely off thread but Susanna Reid's bangers tonight on Strictly were truly things of beauty. She also has a 'pear' shaped bottom. And I love pears.
Shes no Tess Daley
Your right mate. Tess Daley would suck on my ball-sack as I muntered Reid's clacker before finally man-fatting on Darcy Busells pip-tits. Bruce would then shout 'Good Game' as I insulted the poofs while wiping my cock on Len's dressing room curtains. 'Seven!'.
'Seven'
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:08 am
Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:52 am
JONNY012697 wrote:one quote by Daglish that I will take notice of and thats 'I dont know what is going on behind the scenes at the club' and with that in mind despite all the respect I give Kenny he hasnt got a clue about what hes talking about because nobody does outside of our club does. So makes his opinion null and void however well written.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:59 am
Occasional Violins wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:one quote by Daglish that I will take notice of and thats 'I dont know what is going on behind the scenes at the club' and with that in mind despite all the respect I give Kenny he hasnt got a clue about what hes talking about because nobody does outside of our club does. So makes his opinion null and void however well written.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24508638
A view from the inside.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 11:09 am
JONNY012697 wrote:well he did do a good job, but do you know 100% why he got sacked/suspended whatever you want to call it? no didnt think so and until we do I will reserve judgement. Moody may have been taking bungs he may not have done anything wrong and Tan doesnt like him, he may have just simply overspent and Tan considers it unprofessional. Either way nothing in either article is worrying me because its all speculation
Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:12 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:
well he did do a good job, but do you know 100% why he got sacked/suspended whatever you want to call it? no didnt think so and until we do I will reserve judgement. Moody may have been taking bungs he may not have done anything wrong and Tan doesnt like him, he may have just simply overspent and Tan considers it unprofessional. Either way nothing in either article is worrying me because its all speculation
Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:20 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:
well he did do a good job, but do you know 100% why he got sacked/suspended whatever you want to call it? no didnt think so and until we do I will reserve judgement. Moody may have been taking bungs he may not have done anything wrong and Tan doesnt like him, he may have just simply overspent and Tan considers it unprofessional. Either way nothing in either article is worrying me because its all speculation
The fact that an member of staff, who is a "huge loss" (Bellamy's words) has been replaced by the owner & not the manager & has absolutely no experience in football apart from painting a few stadium Walls, doesn't "worry you" is absolutely ridiculous.
No speculation in that.. It's all fact, confirmed by the club.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:17 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:we all know he was good at the job thats why he got it in the first place
Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:19 pm
Occasional Violins wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:we all know he was good at the job thats why he got it in the first place
Does that go for the current incumbent?
Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:20 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:
whats been confirmed, go on then you tell us as you seem to know everything, why was Moody suspended?
everything that my post mentioned.![]()
we all know he was good at the job thats why he got it in the first place
shame the same cannot be said for the current incumbent eh? Although, as you say, you aren't worried that a painter now has his job.
and please dont presume to tell me what to find ridiculous and what not too and either way I havent mentioned the Kazach
the fact that "nothing is worrying" you, I find totally ridiculous... Not at all surprising though.![]()
Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:30 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:
whats been confirmed, go on then you tell us as you seem to know everything, why was Moody suspended?
everything that my post mentioned.![]()
we all know he was good at the job thats why he got it in the first place
shame the same cannot be said for the current incumbent eh? Although, as you say, you aren't worried that a painter now has his job.
and please dont presume to tell me what to find ridiculous and what not too and either way I havent mentioned the Kazach
the fact that "nothing is worrying" you, I find totally ridiculous... Not at all surprising though.![]()
Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:57 pm
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:25 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:
on a temporary basis outside a transfer window with a fully functioning scouting network no not really, the club will find a more suitable candidate on a permanent basis I have no doubt, but then you couldnt answer that the other day
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:28 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:
on a temporary basis outside a transfer window with a fully functioning scouting network no not really, the club will find a more suitable candidate on a permanent basis I have no doubt, but then you couldnt answer that the other day
You don't like assumptions/gossip & prefer official statements, but when it suits your agenda - you like to make assumptions yourself?!
another fine example of your incredible hypocrisy.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:30 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:
the club will find a more suitable candidate on a permanent basis I have no doubt.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:32 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:
the club will find a more suitable candidate on a permanent basis I have no doubt.
Is this a fact that you confirm via club statement? Or are you just assuming that the club will find a more suitable replacement?!
That, is a massive assumption... Which is something you were getting all upset about the other day, when it didn't suit your agenda.
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:36 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:
what part of this Kazakh fella is here temporarily dont you understand?
every part. But you said they will find a suitable replacement... Can you back that up with fact? Or is it just an assumption? (Something I know you hate!)![]()
![]()
![]()
still not answering my question
good at avoiding things aint ya
don't even know what you are on about to be honest... & no, that's not an assumption..![]()
Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:39 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:
what part of this Kazakh fella is here temporarily dont you understand?
every part. But you said they will find a suitable replacement... Can you back that up with fact? Or is it just an assumption? (Something I know you hate!)![]()
![]()
![]()
still not answering my question
good at avoiding things aint ya
don't even know what you are on about to be honest... & no, that's not an assumption..![]()