Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:45 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:48 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:49 pm
GENERAL CHAT wrote:Not according to the 3 page thread that has just been removed it never.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:50 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:Not according to the 3 page thread that has just been removed it never.
Yes it did. Don't recall anyone saying how bad it was... Anyone who attended was totally complimentary. Stop making things up.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:51 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:52 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:52 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I think you best ask Annis or a moderator...
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:53 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I think you best ask Annis or a moderator...
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:55 pm
GENERAL CHAT wrote:What even the remarks about how few attended, it started a year too late, etc etc?
You're the one making things up.
I hope all those that posted in the last thread repost in this one.![]()
This site is going downhill fast.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:56 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:57 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:What even the remarks about how few attended, it started a year too late, etc etc?
You're the one making things up.
I hope all those that posted in the last thread repost in this one.![]()
This site is going downhill fast.
Not at all. I think it was the perfect number, as the meeting in the Corp proved, if you've got 700 you can't discuss anything. 50 is a good number for debate, open forum, discuss ideas.![]()
How can a meeting start a year too late?![]()
Stop digging.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 5:59 pm
sleepers wrote:who decides what 50 go,if it a open forum like you say how can you restrict the attendance to 50.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:01 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:sleepers wrote:who decides what 50 go,if it a open forum like you say how can you restrict the attendance to 50.
It was an open meeting for all bu members from what I gather. Some couldn't make it and some could. Simple.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:10 pm
joncandy wrote:I never asked for the thread to be deleted, I posted on there as some people seemed to think Bluebird 37 was Sian
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:12 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:14 pm
joncandy wrote:I never asked for the thread to be deleted, I posted on there as some people seemed to think Bluebird 37 was Sian
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:19 pm
Forever Blue wrote:joncandy wrote:I never asked for the thread to be deleted, I posted on there as some people seemed to think Bluebird 37 was Sian
Jon and I said Warrior was did I not?
How did the meeting go Jon?
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:20 pm
joncandy wrote:Forever Blue wrote:joncandy wrote:I never asked for the thread to be deleted, I posted on there as some people seemed to think Bluebird 37 was Sian
Jon and I said Warrior was did I not?
How did the meeting go Jon?
It was a good meeting, not as many people as at previous meetings as was pointed out in the other thread but in my opinion was the most constructive so far. It was a 90 minute general discussion around potential plans and ideas on the way forward
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:34 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:43 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 6:45 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:GENERAL CHAT wrote:What even the remarks about how few attended, it started a year too late, etc etc?
You're the one making things up.
I hope all those that posted in the last thread repost in this one.![]()
This site is going downhill fast.
Not at all. I think it was the perfect number, as the meeting in the Corp proved, if you've got 700 you can't discuss anything. 50 is a good number for debate, open forum, discuss ideas.![]()
How can a meeting start a year too late?![]()
Stop digging.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:15 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:33 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:21 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:What did i say wrong?
Jon Candy?
Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:29 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:34 pm
ACE OF CLUBS wrote:Also what's worrying is joncandys attempt at trying to censor it's membership .A classic case of the leadership pushing the panic button and now adopting a siege mentality .
Thu Sep 26, 2013 8:46 pm
JAWS wrote:Quote
please can people not copy and paste comments from this page on to Cardiff City message boards as this can wrongly assume that the individuals comments are statements from Bu itself.
if Bu feel that a statement needs to be released onto a message board then a member of the committee will put it out there.joncandy. End quote.
Quote
I've not posted anything on aamb or ccmb from here and i know you posted this as a polite request but to be honest I'm quite pissed off with the way you have worded it.if Bu feel that a statement needs to be released forgive me if I'm wrong and don't take this the wrong way but aren't we all Bu and to be honest if anyone is posting on boards off hear is that a bad thing?
can i post this or do i need permission from committee.mike pine.end quote.
joncandy the quote policeman.some members clearly not happy with Bu bosses.
Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:05 pm
Bluebird 37 wrote:What did i say wrong?
Jon Candy?
Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:14 pm
Thu Sep 26, 2013 9:25 pm
CardiffKid wrote:B.U. are doing a fine job Jon, keep it up. We all live and learn.
Some people moan like old grandmas, but 95% of us, to varying degrees want our blue back.