Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:24 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:35 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:51 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:03 pm
NeathBlue wrote:National service is great in theory.
Unfortunately, the reality is that our armed forces haven't got the time or the resources to babysit a load of wasters who don't want to be there.
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:11 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:12 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:14 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:15 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:17 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:18 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:20 pm
northside of risca wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Worked with a lad from Finland where national service was in place . He had no qualms about it and was a very tidy lad . Think it's a good idea .
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:20 pm
northside of risca wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Worked with a lad from Finland where national service was in place . He had no qualms about it and was a very tidy lad . Think it's a good idea .
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:20 pm
northside of risca wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Worked with a lad from Finland where national service was in place . He had no qualms about it and was a very tidy lad . Think it's a good idea .
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:32 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 8:50 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:19 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 9:24 pm
JaredCCFC wrote:f**k fighting phoney wars for the bitter and old. There's plenty of other ways to teach discipline and respect than murdering innocent from foreign countries!
You say about how there's plenty of graduates going for jobs what's wrong with competition? surely we should be encouraging education?
Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:12 pm
Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:16 pm
JaredCCFC wrote:Just had a good read from the links, just scanned in the beginning my bad.
Good incentive on the face of it, a load of people will probably end up working for f**k all just like some of the new dole schemes, practically slave labour if you ask me, with no incentives what so ever.
Can understand how it must feel for people with degrees are out of work especially when some places don't employ because of people being 'over qualified'
Countries going down the pan an it'll take a lot more than no pay, government/public sector jobs to sort it out...
Sat Sep 14, 2013 10:45 pm
Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:42 pm
Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:55 pm
Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:55 pm
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:05 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:07 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:JBCCFC1927 wrote:As a 22 year old who would most likely be eligible for this, I 100% agree.
http://www.independent.co.uk/student/ne ... 05449.html
Youngsters need to learn respect, learn that there is more to life than money and having the next gadget and family and so on is more important.
The current system is piling pressure on people to go to college and then to university and then get a job hence the vast number of people who are graduates. Plenty leave the country to seek work elsewhere as skilled professionals and many stay here to fight in the rat race to the top to make a living.
What happens to the others, the forgotten youth? I think national service is a great idea and will teach youngsters respect, practical skills that can be applied in other industries and in day to day life, helps fight obesity if they are called into the military and keeps them off the streets in places where others may take advantage of their situation and help them into a life of crime.
The notion that a young person can choose their 'own future' in the current market is a false one. There are too many graduates fighting for jobs and when there are graduates placed on the unemployment scrap heap this only forces those with lesser qualifications down the pecking order and onto benefits or into other ways of life, often criminal activity. Even some graduates end up down this route when they realise the market place is tougher than they thought.
Some become accustomed to this way of life and they get stuck in it, others fight their way out of it and try and better themselves which is fair enough and credit to them but not everyone does get out and a sedimentary layer is created of those who have no way out. They get stuck in a rut.
National service would give them the opportunity to gain skills, see another side to work other than just making money, networking with other people who may have employment for them down the line, better their CV and another route to go down if college/university isn't the answer.
What's your opinion on the situation?![]()
![]()
Would it be voluntary or like Turkey and Poland where it's the law to do National Service?
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:09 pm
antill_dunning wrote:get a criminal record before doing this.
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:16 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:Would it be voluntary or like Turkey and Poland where it's the law to do National Service?
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:17 pm
blue for you wrote:NS is a great idea but unfortunately there is so much political correctness overload that discipline has greatly changed within the armed forces. We also no longer have the money to babysit teenagers for 2 years in an attempt to teach them morals etc.
Parents need to step up to the plate more.....never mind relying on an organisation to do it for them
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:19 pm
JBCCFC1927 wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Would it be voluntary or like Turkey and Poland where it's the law to do National Service?
its a bill so if its bought forward and accepted it will become law so it will be compulsory
Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:19 pm
Brighton & hove Albion wrote:blue for you wrote:NS is a great idea but unfortunately there is so much political correctness overload that discipline has greatly changed within the armed forces. We also no longer have the money to babysit teenagers for 2 years in an attempt to teach them morals etc.
Parents need to step up to the plate more.....never mind relying on an organisation to do it for them
That was I was waiting to post on the outcome of the post I posted above.
Political correctness would yet again rear it's ugly head.
If it was mandatory then you'd have Muslims being excluded from it on religious beliefs then the rest would have to enroll whether they liked it or not then why should one minority be excluded?
If it was down to the individual then no one would enroll as it'll be to hard work.