' NOT GUILTY "

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Bet Sallys happy

Bet Sallys happy

She's already found someone new

She gets about ai, mayb kev can try it on with Gail she's single lol

He must have gone through hell to be fair

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

The basis of the prosecution's argument was "we have no reason to lie" apparently. I don't know the ins and outs but in this whole Operation Yewtree and its fall out, not every one of the accused is guilty so it is ruining people's lives both on the defence and prosecution side.

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

the problem is these "CELEBS" are easy targets....

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

the problem is these "CELEBS" are easy targets....

Your right there Kevin.

throw the woman the jail or the daughter whoever instigated this.
my guess is maybe hehad an affair with the girls mum or pissed her off and she made her daughter cry rape to get him back ''just a guess'

may be wrong

Last edited by sloper_road_legend on Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

So if he was found guilty then you castrate him then years down line she comes out and said she lied - what then ?

Court proved not guilty - so they did against OJ Simpson - was he innocent of murder >?

So if he was found guilty then you castrate him then years down line she comes out and said she lied - what then ?

Court proved not guilty - so they did against OJ Simpson - was he innocent of murder >?

Point im making is if court is wrong then that girl is suffrering far more

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Just because he was found "Not Guilty," doesn't mean that he is innocent of the alleged crime(s), take OJ Simpson's case for example, how many people actually believe that he was innocent of the murder of his wife and her friend?

If the case had taken place in Scotland the case would have been said to be "Not Proven!"

I certainly hope that he is completely innocent of the accusations and find it astounding that his name was made public, before the outcome of the trial was known!

I don't believe that any suspect's name should be made public, unless they are found to be guilty!

I don't believe that the accuser's name should be made public either, as it may be that she was telling the truth and the prosecution just didn't have sufficient evidence to prove the case!

So if he was found guilty then you castrate him then years down line she comes out and said she lied - what then ?

Court proved not guilty - so they did against OJ Simpson - was he innocent of murder >?

I suppose 30 years of acting experience would go in his favour if he was guilty

So if he was found guilty then you castrate him then years down line she comes out and said she lied - what then ?

Court proved not guilty - so they did against OJ Simpson - was he innocent of murder >?

I suppose 30 years of acting experience would go in his favour if he was guilty

Whether he is truly innocent or not, nobody will ever look at him the same way again and there'll be loads of people still pointing the finger at him!

His life will never be the same again, which is why he shouldn't have been named beforehand and only named, had he been found guilty!

Ideally, the name of the defendant should be kept private until the end - it's just an opportunity for the media to run someone's name into the ground and destroy their life. Innocent until proven guilty? Not with the papers, you're not.

It's just a good job the News of the World is no longer around - they used to have a field day with shit like this; I wonder how many lives they ruined with their sensationalism.

Hopefully justice will follow its course and his life won't be too badly affected going forward.

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

the problem with this is that certain groups say if you name the defendant you encourage other victims to come forward
also the same groups say that the women or victims in these cases should be nameless as they are not being accused of anything. Also their stance on the accusers being tried for wasting the courts time and other charges are that people should not be punished on the grounds that just because they are found not guilty doesnt actually make them not guilty and it would not be fir to punish the victim further and will discourage other victims from coming forward.

I am all for victim anonymity though I believe that the defendant should remain nameless innocent until proven guilty and in this case has the potential to ruin his life if it hasnt already been ruined

justice was done simple as that, I followed the case read every article on it all the evidence was not there, it was a badly put together lie and I apologise if in future it comes out it was true but her stories kept changing all the time

Bet Tyrone is a bit more at ease over the baby sitter now

Shame he can't sue her now, to many people trying to make money on back of the Saville scandal.

Females making up lies just to get money out of it.

Justice for Ched Evans also.

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

yep .dave jones case was bad too annis.kicked out after a day if my memory serves me right.had to leave the saints job to concentrate on his defence.innocent yet even now getting dogs abuse over it

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

yep .dave jones case was bad too annis.kicked out after a day if my memory serves me right.had to leave the saints job to concentrate on his defence.innocent yet even now getting dogs abuse over it

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

yep .dave jones case was bad too annis.kicked out after a day if my memory serves me right.had to leave the saints job to concentrate on his defence.innocent yet even now getting dogs abuse over it

' NOT GUILTY "

For Coronation Street Star Kevin Webster aka Michael Le vell

For 2 years he has had this hanging over him.

But surely now its about time the accused was named on cases like this, as even though he has been found not guilty, His life is tarnished and ruined in many ways and yet the accused continues as though nothing has happened.

Remember He is Not Guilty.

Whats your opinions?

Annis, i've been saying this for years, don't get me wrong, if someone is found guilty of rape or interfering with children i would cut their knackers off and then jail them for a long, long time, but why is the man always named and the woman never named???? you either name both of them or neither of them until after the trial, does this woman now go on trial for lying and wasting tax payers money??? she should do but we all know it wont happen, also with this woman lying it does not help other women with genuine cases of rape/sexual interference who should be taking their accusers to court, the law has to change.

I am with you all the way if he was guilty, castrate him.
Personally I feel either he should never of been named in the first place, only be named if found guilty.
This really does need addressing.

yep .dave jones case was bad too annis.kicked out after a day if my memory serves me right.had to leave the saints job to concentrate on his defence.innocent yet even now getting dogs abuse over it

Shame he can't sue her now, to many people trying to make money on back of the Saville scandal.

It's a lot more complicated than that, I won't say anymore because i'll get myself in a lot of trouble with the law. All will probably be revealed in the coming weeks.

So if he was found guilty then you castrate him then years down line she comes out and said she lied - what then ?

Court proved not guilty - so they did against OJ Simpson - was he innocent of murder >?

I suppose 30 years of acting experience would go in his favour if he was guilty

Whether he is truly innocent or not, nobody will ever look at him the same way again and there'll be loads of people still pointing the finger at him!

His life will never be the same again, which is why he shouldn't have been named beforehand and only named, had he been found guilty!

yeah well put

Shame he can't sue her now, to many people trying to make money on back of the Saville scandal.

It's a lot more complicated than that, I won't say anymore because i'll get myself in a lot of trouble with the law. All will probably be revealed in the coming weeks.

why cant he sue her or the family then?

Innocent , he's come out of it smelling of ROSIE .