Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:15 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:21 am
Bakedalasker wrote:He drove down this morning and is just about to arrive in the CCS car park.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:22 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:31 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:32 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:33 am
Bakedalasker wrote:He drove down this morning and is just about to arrive in the CCS car park.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:37 am
TopCat CCFC wrote:Report: Swansea City end Peter Odemwingie chase
Peter Odemwingie of West Bromwich Albion looks on from the bench during the Barclays Premier League match between West Bromwich Albion and Sunderland at The Hawthorns on February 23, 2013© Getty Images
By Joe Fish, Reporter
Filed: Sunday, September 1, 2013 at 11:23 UK
Last Updated: Sunday, September 1, 2013 at 11:24 UK
Swansea City are unlikely to continue their pursuit of Peter Odemwingie after refusing to meet West Bromwich Albion's £4m asking price for the striker.
Michael Laudrup wants to add another forward to his squad before the close of the transfer window to help ease the goalscoring burden on Michu and new signing Wifried Bony.
Odemwingie, 32, is up for sale following his disciplinary problems at the Hawthorns last season, but Wales on Sunday understands that the Swans are only willing to pay £2.5m for the Nigerian.
Instead, Laudrup will return to the Spanish market to try and lure Getafe striker Alavro Vazquez, who scored four goals in 25 La Liga games during the 2012-2013 campaign, to the Liberty Stadium.
Premier League clubs Cardiff City and Stoke City are also apparently considering bids for Odemwingie.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:42 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:50 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:50 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:53 am
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:54 am
buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:55 am
buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:59 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 11:59 am
buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:01 pm
scott_w_ccfc wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
Agreed.
He's a good player, and will score goals no doubt.
But at 32, £4m is far too much.
I still worry our team will be lacking any natural width this season, which is okay against the better teams and keeping it tight, but when we're home playing the likes of Sunderland/Hull/Palace/Norwich etc it may be a slight problem.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:01 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:04 pm
Bluebina wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Exactly, the window closes tomorrow and we clearly need more goals, we don't have that many options, all good teams have four strikers plus to spread the load and cover for injuries......
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:05 pm
buckleys brewery wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
He has'nt played competively since January, Chuckles. Could be while before he's match fit.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:07 pm
sloper_road_legend wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
In my oppinion no its not, swansea can afford to not pay 4 million as they have a tidy squad outfit,
we on the other hand have one day left and this is a player who may score vital goals and assists for us this season, we dont have premiership replacements in midfield and we need him
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:09 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:13 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:sloper_road_legend wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
In my oppinion no its not, swansea can afford to not pay 4 million as they have a tidy squad outfit,
we on the other hand have one day left and this is a player who may score vital goals and assists for us this season, we dont have premiership replacements in midfield and we need him
well its f*cking madness its come to end of transfer window and have to make these inflated priced deals.
Weve had 2 months to sort it out.
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:15 pm
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:15 pm
Bluebina wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Exactly, the window closes tomorrow and we clearly need more goals, we don't have that many options, all good teams have four strikers plus to spread the load and cover for injuries......
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:15 pm
bluebird58 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Exactly, the window closes tomorrow and we clearly need more goals, we don't have that many options, all good teams have four strikers plus to spread the load and cover for injuries......
If we continue to play 451, which seems to be Malky's preferred option, we only need one striker a game anyway!
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:16 pm
bluebird58 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:buckleys brewery wrote:If we have to pay £4m for him, then that's total madness.
If his goals keep us in the Prem, then that's totally worth it.
Exactly, the window closes tomorrow and we clearly need more goals, we don't have that many options, all good teams have four strikers plus to spread the load and cover for injuries......
If we continue to play 451, which seems to be Malky's preferred option, we only need one striker a game anyway!
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:17 pm
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:19 pm
Qwerts wrote:..... CityGent said yesterday that we blew their offer out of the water, does that mean we are going to spent near £4m on him? .....
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:19 pm
Igovernor wrote:Lets get one thing straight, the jacks only offered £1.3m and we agreed the £2.5m that West brom wanted, it was never £4m in a 1000 years
Sun Sep 01, 2013 12:22 pm
BobbyBlue wrote:Igovernor wrote:Lets get one thing straight, the jacks only offered £1.3m and we agreed the £2.5m that West brom wanted, it was never £4m in a 1000 years
Agree with you there i thought it was 2.5 the jacks did not want to pay, sound very reasonable to me. Dunno wher these nupties are getting 4 mil from