FAO Milky Joe

Who's rock bottom now then?

Us, we played Manchester United

we only have to play them one more time and you have to play em twice. its how this prem lark works, we haven't had a winnable game yet, you have.

Us, we played Manchester United

we only have to play them one more time and you have to play em twice. its how this prem lark works, we haven't had a winnable game yet, you have.

Aye so winnable the Jacks haven't won at Upton Park in the premiership yet.

Us, we played Manchester United

we only have to play them one more time and you have to play em twice. its how this prem lark works, we haven't had a winnable game yet, you have.

Aye so winnable the Jacks haven't won at Upton Park in the premiership yet.

so in 1 game you mean?

we lost narrowly 1-0, trust me, that game was winnable. We then went on to tonk them 3-0 at our place.

Oh Wanky wanky, wanky wanky wanky...... I've squirted milky joe.

Please seek medical assistance Roathy.....for your sake and ours.

Oh Wanky wanky, wanky wanky wanky...... I've squirted milky joe.

Please seek medical assistance Roathy.....for your sake and ours.

wtf?? ooookay

Funny how the Jacks after 1 game last year, going on about top of the league etc & yet this time, it's only after one game, so it doesn't count.



"Winnable" game, that's why Swansea haven't done it yet.

Us, we played Manchester United

we only have to play them one more time and you have to play em twice. its how this prem lark works, we haven't had a winnable game yet, you have.

Aye so winnable the Jacks haven't won at Upton Park in the premiership yet.

so in 1 game you mean?

we lost narrowly 1-0, trust me, that game was winnable. We then went on to tonk them 3-0 at our place.

You still lost you bellend

Funny how the Jacks after 1 game last year, going on about top of the league etc & yet this time, it's only after one game, so it doesn't count.



"Winnable" game, that's why Swansea haven't done it yet.

Games against the top 4 are largely irrelevant. its the games against the other clubs that count. Man Utd are top 4 (champions actually) hence the result doesn't matter, QPR was a winnable game so it was very important and we ran out 4-0 winners.

We have played West Ham twice in the Premier League and won 3-0 and lost 1-0, both games were very winnable. judging from your game yesterday you didn't look capable of a draw even. that's the concern.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

Us, we played Manchester United

we only have to play them one more time and you have to play em twice. its how this prem lark works, we haven't had a winnable game yet, you have.

Obviously Man U is difficult, but I tipped you to get a suprise result yesterday, because they had a new manager and the problems with Rooney. Also you should be ahead of most teams as your season started earlier and this is your third competitive game and you were at home. I am expecting you to start well due to Eupropa League and fade badly at the end because of it. It will be really interesting if you get a bad start and have to try and fit in Europa games.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

We had a number of shots. Get your facts right.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

We had a number of shots. Get your facts right.

1 on target. none which troubled the keeper.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

We had a number of shots. Get your facts right.

1 on target. none which troubled the keeper.

but you said we had no shots.

none of any note Ian. One if you want to be pedantic.

Either way, if the game was played out in the same way and their keeper had no arms they still would have won 2-0. tells you all you need to know - Never in it.

You still lost you bellend

meaning what?

You saying your game with West Ham was winnable but you still lost , so have we I don't see the point your trying to make, your obviously a Jack trying to wind people up but your seriously poor at it , why don't you go back into your caravan and have a rethink or better yet do some colouring in you might be able to do that

You had no shots, how was it winnable? you were never in it.

We lost a very close encounter and created more than enough to win it. its was winnable.

We had a number of shots. Get your facts right.

1 on target. none which troubled the keeper.

so weve gone from 0 to 1 now make your mind up
What the hell are you on about you lost a winnable game every game is winnable otherwise why should a team turn up you are really scraping the barrel for your poor attempts at wind ups.

Funny how the Jacks after 1 game last year, going on about top of the league etc & yet this time, it's only after one game, so it doesn't count.



"Winnable" game, that's why Swansea haven't done it yet.

Games against the top 4 are largely irrelevant. its the games against the other clubs that count. Man Utd are top 4 (champions actually) hence the result doesn't matter, QPR was a winnable game so it was very important and we ran out 4-0 winners.

We have played West Ham twice in the Premier League and won 3-0 and lost 1-0, both games were very winnable. judging from your game yesterday you didn't look capable of a draw even. that's the concern.

You lost away to West Ham so did we???

We had more possession and more corners slightly less shots, it was a tight game, and they beat is with two good finishes. West Ham away is not an easy game they picked up 36 points at home last season.

so weve gone from 0 to 1 now make your mind up
What the hell are you on about you lost a winnable game every game is winnable otherwise why should a team turn up you are really scraping the barrel for your poor attempts at wind ups.

make my mind up? ok it seems like you had 1 but none that troubled the keeper.

If you only had one shot then how is it winnable when the opponent scored 2?

We had more than 1 shot.

Dear me.

Winnable or not, you didn't win there & neither did we. Even though your team was "vastly superior"

none of any note Ian. One if you want to be pedantic.

Either way, if the game was played out in the same way and their keeper had no arms they still would have won 2-0. tells you all you need to know - Never in it.

We had twelve shots and more possession, it was a tight game, and a good couple of finishes.

West Ham are the eighth best team at Home, it was always going to be a difficult game.

none of any note Ian. One if you want to be pedantic.

Either way, if the game was played out in the same way and their keeper had no arms they still would have won 2-0. tells you all you need to know - Never in it.

The argument is you said we had no shots yet we did and you continue to argue.

About time you were removed Roathie.

We had more than 1 shot.

Dear me.

Winnable or not, you didn't win there & neither did we. Even though your team was "vastly superior"

on target?

no Barry, you didn't. laughing smiley.

Yes we lost there in a very tight an winnable encounter that was end to end with both having great scoring opportunities. your match was never winnable as you were never in it. simple.

laughing smiley

none of any note Ian. One if you want to be pedantic.

Either way, if the game was played out in the same way and their keeper had no arms they still would have won 2-0. tells you all you need to know - Never in it.

The argument is you said we had no shots yet we did and you continue to argue.

About time you were removed Roathie.

No, the argument was that you were never in the game. which you weren't.

you had one shot on target, which didn't trouble the keeper.

and im not roathie, daya.

none of any note Ian. One if you want to be pedantic.

Either way, if the game was played out in the same way and their keeper had no arms they still would have won 2-0. tells you all you need to know - Never in it.

The argument is you said we had no shots yet we did and you continue to argue.

About time you were removed Roathie.

No, the argument was that you were never in the game. which you weren't.

you had one shot on target, which didn't trouble the keeper.

and im not roathie, daya.

Your Daya?

no im not.

on target?

no Barry, you didn't. laughing smiley.

Yes we lost there in a very tight an winnable encounter that was end to end with both having great scoring opportunities. your match was never winnable as you were never in it. simple.

laughing smiley

Putting words in people's mouths again Roathie?

no im not.

Good I quite like Daya.