Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:34 am

Why are you letting a Jack post under numerous Cardiff City usernames?

No problem with the Jacks posting on here, a few of them are sound, and even the ones who like an argument at least they post under Swansea name.

However, letting a Jack troll under Cardiff City usernames? Do me a favour.

You know what hes doing yet you continue to let it happen. Why?

Its making a mockery of the board and its no wonder there are a lot of good posters who dont bother posting anymore. The board has become a parody of CCMB.

And yet you have the cheek to say there will be bans if people dare to mock Carl (you said those who pass on information but everyone knew it meant Carl) yet you let this weirdo mock the whole board??

Pathetic.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:38 am

Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:41 am

Polo, give me a list and I will look now

I banned one this am :thumbup:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:42 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:43 am

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:


God knows. :lol:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:45 am

CCFCPAUL
BOBBYBLUE
BLUEYTHEBLOO

If you are going to let Roath on here just let him post under his own name.
Last edited by Mario Polotelli on Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:47 am, edited 2 times in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:45 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?



Thats a pity if true.As I,ve said before,you don't keep a dog and bark yourself and it seems that Annis falls for any old guff off theese trolls.If he appoints a mod he should be decent enough to trust their judgement.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:45 am

You tell anyone that disagrees with you that they are a jack though :lol:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:46 am

CCFCPAUL wrote:You tell anyone that disagrees with you that they are a jack though :lol:


Like a moth to a flame

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:46 am

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:

Not totally true Gentleman

But this is confidential info :lol: :thumbup:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:47 am

I don't mind them. The fact when I went on their forum I got insulted constantly without doing anything shows how pathetic they are. Literally made a point I thought we had a better midfield, it went on to someone saying they were going to rape my neice. I got banned hahah . Let them stay as we are not as petty and gypoish as them.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:49 am

Forever Blue wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:

Not totally true Gentleman

But this is confidential info :lol: :thumbup:

Whos the leaking Mod that let chuckles know this info then, i want to see a forum court rite now :lol: :ayatollah:
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:50 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:
CCFCPAUL wrote:You tell anyone that disagrees with you that they are a jack though :lol:


Like a moth to a flame


Or a poster to a thread. :roll:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:50 am

Bluebird1977 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:

Not totally true Gentleman

But this is confidential info :lol: :thumbup:
:lol:
Whos the leaking Mod that let chuckles this info then, i want to see a forum court :lol: :ayatollah:

:lol:

Please name him Chuckles :lol:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:51 am

Forever Blue wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Bluebird1977 wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:Totally agree. In fairness to some of the mods, I spoke to one and they told me that some Mods banning rights having been revoked. :?

Whats the point in being a mod then :laughing5:

Not totally true Gentleman

But this is confidential info :lol: :thumbup:
:lol:
Whos the leaking Mod that let chuckles this info then, i want to see a forum court :lol: :ayatollah:

:lol:

Please name him Chuckles :lol:

Here f*cking here :lol: Name and shame chucks :malky:
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:52 am

Forever Blue wrote:
Please name him Chuckles :lol:


Oh I can't say public ally ;) but I messaged him about a certain member trolling & he said he knew but that he couldn't do anything because his banning rights had been removed for an unknown reason...

:happy1:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:53 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Please name him Chuckles :lol:


Oh I can't say public ally ;) but I messaged him about a certain member trolling & he said he knew but that he couldn't do anything because his banning rights had been removed for an unknown reason...

:happy1:

Doing a barnett now chucks, you know his name but carnt say, like his incoming transfer threads :lol: :ayatollah:
Last edited by Bluebird1977 on Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:53 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:CCFCPAUL
BOBBYBLUE
BLUEYTHEBLOO

If you are going to let Roath on here just let him post under his own name.


Hi polo my old chum. I am in fact Roathie. Im more than happy to post as a jack under my own username, but the mods ban it so i must be creative in order to put my views across.

Nice idea in theory though.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:53 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:CCFCPAUL
BOBBYBLUE
BLUEYTHEBLOO

If you are going to let Roath on here just let him post under his own name.


Veteran fan I'd add to that... Possibly.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:57 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:Why are you letting a Jack post under numerous Cardiff City usernames?

No problem with the Jacks posting on here, a few of them are sound, and even the ones who like an argument at least they post under Swansea name.

However, letting a Jack troll under Cardiff City usernames? Do me a favour.

You know what hes doing yet you continue to let it happen. Why?

Its making a mockery of the board and its no wonder there are a lot of good posters who dont bother posting anymore. The board has become a parody of CCMB.

And yet you have the cheek to say there will be bans if people dare to mock Carl (you said those who pass on information but everyone knew it meant Carl) yet you let this weirdo mock the whole board??

Pathetic.


I hardly post these days and i know a few other that wont post at all..

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:57 am

Mario Polotelli wrote:
CCFCPAUL wrote:You tell anyone that disagrees with you that they are a jack though :lol:


Like a moth to a flame

:lol: HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF WHICH IS HYSTERICAL AND EVER SO SLIGHTLY DISTURBING :ayatollah:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:58 am

Bluebird1977 wrote:Doing a barnett now chucks, you know his name but carnt say, like his incoming transfer threads :lol: :ayatollah:


RECEIVING A PHONE CALL AT 6pm WILL UPDATE YOU ALL THEN :malky:
Last edited by Barry Chuckle on Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:58 am

Jinks wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Why are you letting a Jack post under numerous Cardiff City usernames?

No problem with the Jacks posting on here, a few of them are sound, and even the ones who like an argument at least they post under Swansea name.

However, letting a Jack troll under Cardiff City usernames? Do me a favour.

You know what hes doing yet you continue to let it happen. Why?

Its making a mockery of the board and its no wonder there are a lot of good posters who dont bother posting anymore. The board has become a parody of CCMB.

And yet you have the cheek to say there will be bans if people dare to mock Carl (you said those who pass on information but everyone knew it meant Carl) yet you let this weirdo mock the whole board??

Pathetic.


I hardly post these days and i know a few other that wont post at all..


Thank god for that jinks :laughing5:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 10:58 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:RECEIVING A PHONE CALL AT 6pm WILL UPDATE YOU ALL THEN :malky:

:laughing5:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:00 am

Ive given them a chance, its up to them whether they take it. I will always post my views, it just depends on the mods as to what username i do it from, one or a thousand and one.

I couldnt care leas either way.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:06 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:CCFCPAUL
BOBBYBLUE
BLUEYTHEBLOO

If you are going to let Roath on here just let him post under his own name.


Veteran fan I'd add to that... Possibly.




noooo veteran fan is taffy apple! :lol:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:12 am

I agree with Mario in that it's the multiple account CCFC windups that drag a very good board down and cause bad feeling towards fellow fans who don't actually exist ;) When you can't even believe the people you are chatting with are genuine it's a mockery, For instance the same pro-red goon on numerous accounts demanding that the rebrand issue be seperated from the main forum, That other guy with no post history or substance claiming to be a mate of the Malaysian tourist for e.g." It's genuine, i'm friends with the family" It's only a few people doing it, barnett got so bad to the point i didn't post for a WHOLE fortnight. :D Sadly he's worse than the jacks, There should be a Roathie amnesty, Fresh start on a fresh gypsy account. I also think Barnett deserves a spell on zero tolerence probation. cue him offering to meet me again for a chat :lol: What about i don't know, He knows i''m a psychologist, so perhaps it's a cry for help :ayatollah:

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:16 am

Real_Blue_Really wrote:I agree with Mario in that it's the multiple account CCFC windups that drag a very good board down and cause bad feeling towards fellow fans who don't actually exist ;) When you can't even believe the people you are chatting with are genuine it's a mockery, For instance the same pro-red goon on numerous accounts demanding that the rebrand issue be seperated from the main forum, That other guy with no post history or substance claiming to be a mate of the Malaysian tourist for e.g." It's genuine, i'm friends with the family" It's only a few people doing it, barnett got so bad to the point i didn't post for a WHOLE fortnight. :D Sadly he's worse than the jacks, There should be a Roathie amnesty, Fresh start on a fresh gypsy account. I also think Barnett deserves a spell on zero tolerence probation. cue him offering to meet me again for a chat :lol:


If you don't want me to post then all you have to do is ask politely in a civilised fashion and I will stop posting and I genuinely mean that. There are other forums to use so there's no big issue. Your call.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:20 am

Stringer Bell wrote:
Real_Blue_Really wrote:I agree with Mario in that it's the multiple account CCFC windups that drag a very good board down and cause bad feeling towards fellow fans who don't actually exist ;) When you can't even believe the people you are chatting with are genuine it's a mockery, For instance the same pro-red goon on numerous accounts demanding that the rebrand issue be seperated from the main forum, That other guy with no post history or substance claiming to be a mate of the Malaysian tourist for e.g." It's genuine, i'm friends with the family" It's only a few people doing it, barnett got so bad to the point i didn't post for a WHOLE fortnight. :D Sadly he's worse than the jacks, There should be a Roathie amnesty, Fresh start on a fresh gypsy account. I also think Barnett deserves a spell on zero tolerence probation. cue him offering to meet me again for a chat :lol:


If you don't want me to post then all you have to do is ask politely in a civilised fashion and I will stop posting and I genuinely mean that. There are other forums to use so there's no big issue. Your call.


That ultimatum hints at a level of dellusion regarding selfworth that i haven't whitnessed in a while. In your head what happens next? Annis begs you to stay? :lol:
Last edited by Real_Blue_Really on Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO: MODERATORS

Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:20 am

I have offered a Roathie amnesty several times. But as soon as i ask an awkward question they hit the panic button again and im forced into having to use another username and sometimes a new identity.

The sooner people learn how to debate the sooner people will learn to not go crying for banning because they have been proven wrong and the sooner people wont have to create new usernames.

It really isnt hard folks. Ban posters for breaking forum rules not for winning a debate.
Last edited by Masterplan on Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.