Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:23 am

Corky started a thread this morning about Capoue, the 5th reply was from a gypo who derailed the thread, this is happening time after time on here with these tramps latley, when are you going to take some action??????

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:28 am

Pm sent to him :thumbup:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:35 am

Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:


Cheers annis :thumbup:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:47 am

no one on planet swamp for you to talk to?

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:48 pm

cityone wrote:Corky started a thread this morning about Capoue, the 5th reply was from a gypo who derailed the thread, this is happening time after time on here with these tramps latley, when are you going to take some action??????


Couldn't agree more. There's a few JB's who always do it & the reasons are obvious. Why do we put up with it & why do the same poster's always bite creating what's starts as a decent thread into nonsense?

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:01 pm

There are some decent Jacks on here, in fact I had a decent football debate with one on the very thread you are talking about.

You ban the Jacks they will just come back on with CCFC log ins, as that weird c*nt Roathie is currently doing as CCFCPAUL.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:10 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:There are some decent Jacks on here, in fact I had a decent football debate with one on the very thread you are talking about.

You ban the Jacks they will just come back on with CCFC log ins, as that weird c*nt Roathie is currently doing as CCFCPAUL.


I want to talk with Roathie about a diagnosis, whether he's had one or not. I've been studying him intermitently between bannings and now confidently believe he may have a high functioning form of autism(aspergers) with possible OCD . the good news with this,is that he can't ever develope schizophrenia so strictly speaking he is not insane, the bad news. He can't develope interpersonal relationships very easily if at all. Roathie PM me if i'm correct or warm. My colleague reckons you could be a sociopath but he's newly qualified and a bit daft, he wears converse boots a size too big and pulls the laces in tight so his plates of meat look like canoes. I can give you his number if you like.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:02 pm

Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:17 pm

I would delete the posts that are intent on derailing a thread, but obviously a mod deleting a post on the forum generally causes forum uproar

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:18 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Perhaps people are fed up with open season on Carl for no apparent reason what so ever. You might well be Peter from margam, but in my view, if one goes out of there way to be personal with a named and photographed member, they should be fully transparent about who they are.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:24 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Peter 3 jacks have been given warnings today.

Peter I think you will find you are also as bad as them.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:26 pm

Gavin wrote:I would delete the posts that are intent on derailing a thread, but obviously a mod deleting a post on the forum generally causes forum uproar

Correct Gavin, we can't win, so I sent 3 warnings out :thumbup:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:27 pm

Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:28 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Peter 3 jacks have been given warnings today.

Peter I think you will find you are also as bad as them.[

Can you explain Annis

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:30 pm

[quote="Mario Polotelli"]Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:34 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?


I far from agree with them on everything, Ive had countless spats with Annis myself, but also agree with him on some things, have a joke with him and others, and generally enjoy the forum. If it made me as miserable as you appear to be I wouldnt bother coming on here.

Every time you post its a whinge or a pot shot at them. One look at your posting history will tell you that. Perhaps you dont realise how much of a whinger you are.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:34 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Peter 3 jacks have been given warnings today.

Peter I think you will find you are also as bad as them.[

Can you explain Annis


You could say that what ever I post you oppose that's your right and it's great to have different opinions, no problem with that, but you will go out of your way o belittle anything I or Carl says, a bit like the Jacks do to some Cardiff you could say.
I suppose it comes with he territory and it now goes over my head.
Jacks are our rivals,it's called banter, if they go over the top and it's reported they will be warned and banned. :thumbup:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:36 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?

I'm not a big fan of banning things, but can someone PTB on peter he's really annoying me for some reason. :D

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:41 pm

Real_Blue_Really wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Perhaps people are fed up with open season on Carl for no apparent reason what so ever. You might well be Peter from margam, but in my view, if one goes out of there way to be personal with a named and photographed member, they should be fully transparent about who they are.


Where have I ever been personal with Carl Annis or anybody else ???? What du want? who I am?? I'll
Give you transparent ( good coming from somebody who goes behind your username) I was born south William st in the docks 65 years ago I've supported the city since 1960 my name is Peter Chatterton and i live in Margam so check with anybody from port talbot who I am !!!! No I don't hide behind some user name so nobody knows who I am and you talk about being transparent

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:46 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Pm sent to him :thumbup:



Annis yesterday morning I replied to a thread regarding an article by Terry Phillips and for some reason you came back and questioned me about not sticking to the thread title and saying I'm having a go at Carl ( read the whole thread ) yet a little more than 24 hours later the jacks are all Over a thread that's got nothing to do with the headline. It's been happening for months it's time you practiced what you preach

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118559

Peter 3 jacks have been given warnings today.

Peter I think you will find you are also as bad as them.[

Can you explain Annis


You could say that what ever I post you oppose that's your right and it's great to have different opinions, no problem with that, but you will go out of your way o belittle anything I or Carl says, a bit like the Jacks do to some Cardiff you could say.
I suppose it comes with he territory and it now goes over my head.
Jacks are our rivals,it's called banter, if they go over the top and it's reported they will be warned and banned. :thumbup:


Annis how is disagreeing with you or Carl belittling you??

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:48 pm

Peter from Margam - you are making the classic mistake in thinking that what goes on here is actually important - chill out Peter, get some zeds, you're getting all Barry Chuckles on us.

Not everything you write is whingy - its just you are getting a bit obsessive now so take a breather.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:49 pm

Provenance.


Those few know who i am, unless i intend getting personal on a persistent basis others needn't know who i am. In otherwords anonymity is fine unless going after named individuals. Do you disagree with this sentiment?

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:51 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?


I far from agree with them on everything, Ive had countless spats with Annis myself, but also agree with him on some things, have a joke with him and others, and generally enjoy the forum. If it made me as miserable as you appear to be I wouldnt bother coming on here.

Every time you post its a whinge or a pot shot at them. One look at your posting history will tell you that. Perhaps you dont realise how much of a whinger you are.


How would you know about my personality ? Me I'm happy as a sand-boy your entitled to your opinion but its only fair I give mine

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:53 pm

Pack it in Peter. This was a thread about Jacks derailing threads and now youve gone and derailed it from the initial topic. :laughing6:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:54 pm

JimmyJazz wrote:Peter from Margam - you are making the classic mistake in thinking that what goes on here is actually important - chill out Peter, get some zeds, you're getting all Barry Chuckles on us.

Not everything you write is whingy - its just you are getting a bit obsessive now so take a breather.


Perhaps your right pal

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:58 pm

Real_Blue_Really wrote:Provenance.


Those few know who i am, unless i intend getting personal on a persistent basis others needn't know who i am. In otherwords anonymity is fine unless going after named individuals. Do you disagree with this sentiment?


You wanted me transparent I have been

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:01 pm

peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?


I far from agree with them on everything, Ive had countless spats with Annis myself, but also agree with him on some things, have a joke with him and others, and generally enjoy the forum. If it made me as miserable as you appear to be I wouldnt bother coming on here.

Every time you post its a whinge or a pot shot at them. One look at your posting history will tell you that. Perhaps you dont realise how much of a whinger you are.


How would you know about my personality ? Me I'm happy as a sand-boy your entitled to your opinion but its only fair I give mine


I can only judge on how you come across on here Peter, hence I used the word "appear", but you always seem to be on a downer with the forum.

Youve just explained you are 65 so maybe its something to do with that.

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:05 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:
peter from margam wrote:
Mario Polotelli wrote:Peter from Margam is another who only ever posts when he is taking pot shots at Carl or Annis.

Peter, I dont know why you bother coming on here, the messageboard clearly irritates you.[/quote

Irritates me good god no. I'm no yes man to Annis Carl or anybody else. Should everybody agree with them then ?


I far from agree with them on everything, Ive had countless spats with Annis myself, but also agree with him on some things, have a joke with him and others, and generally enjoy the forum. If it made me as miserable as you appear to be I wouldnt bother coming on here.

Every time you post its a whinge or a pot shot at them. One look at your posting history will tell you that. Perhaps you dont realise how much of a whinger you are.


How would you know about my personality ? Me I'm happy as a sand-boy your entitled to your opinion but its only fair I give mine


I can only judge on how you come across on here Peter, hence I used the word "appear", but you always seem to be on a downer with the forum.

Youve just explained you are 65 so maybe its something to do with that.


:laughing6: :lol: Na Mario I'd jump over your head mate but I got a feeling the missus might agree with you

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:13 pm

Thats better Peter, first time Ive seen you laugh on here. :lol: :ayatollah:

Re: FAO THE MODERATORS

Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:16 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:Thats better Peter, first time Ive seen you laugh on here. :lol: :ayatollah:


:x :lol: :lol: