Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:20 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:21 pm
Grumpyguts wrote:This really is a genuine question not in anyway another to bring up the old nutmeg.
Watching VTs interview last evening at U of W I am sure the Fans that refuse the red are actually getting to him.
This is only my observation
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:23 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:23 pm
Roy wrote:Grumpyguts wrote:This really is a genuine question not in anyway another to bring up the old nutmeg.
Watching VTs interview last evening at U of W I am sure the Fans that refuse the red are actually getting to him.
This is only my observation
In your dreams
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:24 pm
RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:26 pm
Grumpyguts wrote:This really is a genuine question not in anyway another to bring up the old nutmeg.
Watching VTs interview last evening at U of W I am sure the Fans that refuse the red are actually getting to him.
This is only my observation
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:29 pm
RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:47 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
It's bigger than that & it's clearly getting to him.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:51 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:06 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I notice how you like to attack my posts, just to get a rise. The actions of an immature troll.
Here's what I think.
If tan wasn't bothered about those against the rebrand, he wouldn't have :-
*Given out red scarves for free to encourage the wearing of red.
*Tell fans that they shouldn't sing blue songs next season (at the supporters dinner)
*Bring up the rebrand every time he's interviewed.
*Try to threaten fans with him leaving every time someone rejects the red.
His interview is clearly at those who "disrespect" him.
Now instead of trolling, why not try and actually debate?
Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:09 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:21 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:56 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I notice how you like to attack my posts, just to get a rise. The actions of an immature troll.
Here's what I think.
If tan wasn't bothered about those against the rebrand, he wouldn't have :-
*Given out red scarves for free to encourage the wearing of red.
*Tell fans that they shouldn't sing blue songs next season (at the supporters dinner)
*Bring up the rebrand every time he's interviewed.
*Try to threaten fans with him leaving every time someone rejects the red.
His interview is clearly at those who "disrespect" him.
Now instead of trolling, why not try and actually debate?
Fri Jul 19, 2013 3:59 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:04 pm
CantonJack wrote:Tan is a c**t
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:07 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:12 pm
RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:16 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Is he any more disliked than any other clubs chairman ?
The anti Tan (red) lobby on here probably have about 10:1 ratio superiority, but what do you get on here ? About 400 posters out of 22K season ticket holders..... Not really a significant voice.
He does want adulation, appreciation and the 5% must bug him. They can be replaced and will be as long as we are in the premier league. Before the usual cry of they won't be there if we get relegated, nor will Tan....In his plans he has sold us before that day....For a profit of course, but he does love us....
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:49 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:I notice how you like to attack my posts, just to get a rise. The actions of an immature troll.
Here's what I think.
If tan wasn't bothered about those against the rebrand, he wouldn't have :-
*Given out red scarves for free to encourage the wearing of red.
*Tell fans that they shouldn't sing blue songs next season (at the supporters dinner)
*Bring up the rebrand every time he's interviewed.
*Try to threaten fans with him leaving every time someone rejects the red.
His interview is clearly at those who "disrespect" him.
Now instead of trolling, why not try and actually debate?
Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:57 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:32 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Tan is no different to any entreprener billionaire. It does not matter where you come from in the world money and power makes them all think the same. Anyone recall Robert Maxwell.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:24 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
It's bigger than that & it's clearly getting to him.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:25 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:RobJr wrote:An irrelevant 5% to him.
It's bigger than that & it's clearly getting to him.
700 people at a BU meeting = Less than 5% of support
Handful of people asking for refunded ST last season = Less than 5% of support
Biggest of all though is the huge numbers of ST renewals seeing people like you who think the rebrand is "Ghastly" financially back it!![]()
![]()
Priceless.![]()
![]()
you bring up the same boring arguments every time. Supporting the team, as I always will do. I trust that when you were fobbed off by Ridsdale (assuming you aren't a latecomer) you stopped going, because you wouldn't want to financially back it? Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:29 pm
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:31 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:I bring up the same arguments because you never give me a straight reply instead you squirm like a little worm in a birds beak because deep down you know I am right, you can't walk away.
I don't like what Tan has done just like I didn't like what Ridsdale had done but I signed up both times in the knowledge that I was now backing their agenda, however flawed they are, I am half tempted to type it out again in basic English as I just know you won't be able to digest that without frothing at the mouth and completely missing the point.
I love Cardiff city more than I hate the rebrand, can you say the same Chuckles?
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:36 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:I bring up the same arguments because you never give me a straight reply instead you squirm like a little worm in a birds beak because deep down you know I am right, you can't walk away.
I don't like what Tan has done just like I didn't like what Ridsdale had done but I signed up both times in the knowledge that I was now backing their agenda, however flawed they are, I am half tempted to type it out again in basic English as I just know you won't be able to digest that without frothing at the mouth and completely missing the point.
I love Cardiff city more than I hate the rebrand, can you say the same Chuckles?
I've said the same all along you silly fool.![]()
So you didn't agree with what Ridsdale did and still went, yet telling me that I don't like the rebrand & still going is hypocritical.![]()
Get back to school... Oh, I forgot, you're still in school.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:38 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Knew I should have written twice. Stop making wholly inaccurate assumptions about me - Who does that sound like to you? Just another forum bully who can't handle the truth, get a job and see that life does not revolve around Cardiff City football club.
In the mean time my friend, au revoir.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:47 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Knew I should have written twice. Stop making wholly inaccurate assumptions about me - Who does that sound like to you? Just another forum bully who can't handle the truth, get a job and see that life does not revolve around Cardiff City football club.
In the mean time my friend, au revoir.
Got one thanks young man.![]()
Forum bully? I'd say that was the anonymous person on here, who nobody has met, who swears and abuses members whilst pretending to be an old man.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:52 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Knew I should have written twice. Stop making wholly inaccurate assumptions about me - Who does that sound like to you? Just another forum bully who can't handle the truth, get a job and see that life does not revolve around Cardiff City football club.
In the mean time my friend, au revoir.
Got one thanks young man.![]()
Forum bully? I'd say that was the anonymous person on here, who nobody has met, who swears and abuses members whilst pretending to be an old man.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You definitely do not have a job judging by your character traits on here. You are probably a charming bloke away from the internet but you are an absolute tool on it. Anonymity? Isn't that something you swore blind by when you first joined up?
Are you pretending to be Barry Chuckles then sunshine? With that name and profile picture I think you are. Another own goal by the forum dunce.
Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:04 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Knew I should have written twice. Stop making wholly inaccurate assumptions about me - Who does that sound like to you? Just another forum bully who can't handle the truth, get a job and see that life does not revolve around Cardiff City football club.
In the mean time my friend, au revoir.
Got one thanks young man.![]()
Forum bully? I'd say that was the anonymous person on here, who nobody has met, who swears and abuses members whilst pretending to be an old man.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You definitely do not have a job judging by your character traits on here. You are probably a charming bloke away from the internet but you are an absolute tool on it. Anonymity? Isn't that something you swore blind by when you first joined up?
Are you pretending to be Barry Chuckles then sunshine? With that name and profile picture I think you are. Another own goal by the forum dunce.
Oh dear, you are wrong again. Getting into a habit of this, aren't you?
You're the "tool" on here. Belittling and prejudicing against different groups of people.
No, I don't claim to be Chuckle. I've never spoken in the style of Chuckle, whereas you claim to be an old
Man, claim to be there for so many years & post in the style of a 71 year old man.
Be anonymous all you like, but if you're going to mouth off and abuse people and throw insults around like you do (regularly prejudicing students, when you're probably one yourself) I'd say it makes you look a little silly.
I don't agree with your views & you don't agree with mine. That's the equity of forums, but whereas I can debate, you just like to turn to insults, which blows your 71 year old
Man story.