DID TAN ACTUALLY STATE

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

A lot of people shot you down and Annis even said the deals that didn't happen would come into the open and have the explanation explained why they didn't.

People take your posts without reading them carefully and twisting your words.

In fairness we seemed clear favourites, there is nothing wrong with being confident with your information Carl as even the club were confident.

We all know Tan lies

never doubt your info mate

Frankly Curt,there is a lot of jealousy on here regarding you and Annis' ITK status.

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

A lot of people shot you down and Annis even said the deals that didn't happen would come into the open and have the explanation explained why they didn't.

People take your posts without reading them carefully and twisting your words.

In fairness we seemed clear favourites, there is nothing wrong with being confident with your information Carl as even the club were confident.

Thank you Dando, those are my words
The truth always comes out in the end

old news we move on
Bring on the prem

Why does this "told you so" thread need to be a sticky? come on for god sake. The sticky function should really only be used about important club issues surely not as an ego boost for ITK people pmsl

Why does this "told you so" thread need to be a sticky? come on for god sake. The sticky function should really only be used about important club issues surely not as an ego boost for ITK people pmsl

Exactly. What a non topic. Cant believe its a sticky.

Where does he say they agreed a fee with Celtic? It says 'WE agreed to buy Wanyama'. This could mean Tan and Malky agreed to buy him....not Tan and Celtic

Where does he say they agreed a fee with Celtic? It says 'WE agreed to buy Wanyama'. This could mean Tan and Malky agreed to buy him....not Tan and Celtic

According to Celtic they never agreed a fee with us,as we never matched Southampton's bid

breaking news..

tan and now carl on the verbal attack

Where does he say they agreed a fee with Celtic? It says 'WE agreed to buy Wanyama'. This could mean Tan and Malky agreed to buy him....not Tan and Celtic

According to Celtic they never agreed a fee with us,as we never matched Southampton's bid

Exactly. Why the f**k is this a sticky? Absolutely pathetic on here seeing those who pretend to be ITK crying for even more attention.

Who cares.

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

Not getting enough attention?

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

Carl you'll never win some people mate. The trouble is the English language can be so ambiguous so anyone who wants to put you down can do so by playing on words or frankly being utterly deluded by not factoring in your whole post.

I have no doubt what you post is in good faith and is correct as far as the knowledge you possess at that time. The problems arise when there is a change in circumstances over witch you have no control. Even if you or Annis post a caveat like with the Tom Ince transfer the sad bastards will claim that the player changing his mind is not a dramatic U-turn and as you are not privy to private family conversations you are not ITK .

I fully agree that this should be a sticky. Carl has taken unbelievable stick recently and has every right to put the record straight as far as he is concerned.

Who cares.

Carl does and you would have the exact same attitude if you were bold enough to post information which was then slaughtered for the wrong reason.

Its quite simple really. Wait for official club statements ..........end of ! Ignore any "Rumours" however credible they may or may NOT be !

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

Not getting enough attention?

He kept telling us he couldn't get on some of the rides on hols because he is to short, so he must have short man syndrome

Carl you'll never win some people mate. The trouble is the English language can be so ambiguous so anyone who wants to put you down can do so by playing on words or frankly being utterly deluded by not factoring in your whole post.

I have no doubt what you post is in good faith and is correct as far as the knowledge you possess at that time. The problems arise when there is a change in circumstances over witch you have no control. Even if you or Annis post a caveat like with the Tom Ince transfer the sad bastards will claim that the player changing his mind is not a dramatic U-turn and as you are not privy to private family conversations you are not ITK .

I fully agree that this should be a sticky. Carl has taken unbelievable stick recently and has every right to put the record straight as far as he is concerned.

Maybe you should change your name to Tony Brown Williams?

Nobody is ITK anymore, it's that simple. The club is far better for it too.

Who cares.

Carl does and you would have the exact same attitude if you were bold enough to post information which was then slaughtered for the wrong reason.

I don't care one bit if he got some information wrong. I take all 'information' with a pinch of salt, even with the media. Just absolute rubbish journalism has been coming out this window. Complete fiction by huge corporations, playing on fans hope. Malky is doing his best for the team, we will know in time whos coming in and out. People need to stop taking it so seriously. Other fans take the piss because our fans were coming to conclusions with Ince. The same is happening with that 20 year old from Benfica now. 'Dead cert', doubt it.

Carl you'll never win some people mate. The trouble is the English language can be so ambiguous so anyone who wants to put you down can do so by playing on words or frankly being utterly deluded by not factoring in your whole post.

I have no doubt what you post is in good faith and is correct as far as the knowledge you possess at that time. The problems arise when there is a change in circumstances over witch you have no control. Even if you or Annis post a caveat like with the Tom Ince transfer the sad bastards will claim that the player changing his mind is not a dramatic U-turn and as you are not privy to private family conversations you are not ITK .

I fully agree that this should be a sticky. Carl has taken unbelievable stick recently and has every right to put the record straight as far as he is concerned.

Maybe you should change your name to Tony Brown Williams?

Nobody is ITK anymore, it's that simple. The club is far better for it too.

Unlike some I have stuck with the Username I adopted in 2009 when this message board was first established.

Funny half of your replies to me and others contain the words "making an assumption there doesn't mean your right"

Strange the rules seem to go out the window when you post. Isn't your final sentence an "assumption?" or should you change your name to Barry Copout

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

Why the hell would they accept £10 million when they knew clubs were willing to pay £12 million?

Carl you are doing yourself no favours again here. Learn man

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

I'm glad he's not I bet a few people wished he was.

Steve Davies is one of the best posters on this forum. One of the few people whos views I take seriously on the old ddays.

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million

Thought you were finished with this forum?

feel free to delete my account by all means. your reaction is typical of the mods on this forum all gather round to protect each others asses.
Carl asked a question and i posted the response to that question. the bid for wanyama was never accepted by celtic because it was 2 million short of the 12 million they had already accepted.
i just posted to put the record straight.
i stopped posting purely because of the cowardly & libellous crap posted about paul guy on here

"We actually agreed to buy (Victor) Wanyama, but Celtic raised what they wanted."

"We were at £10m but they wanted more and I said, ‘No’ so somebody paid more."


So when I said that we had a bid of £10m accepted I was indeed correct but I got shot down because the deal never went through I got slaughtered on here for a good week.

It goes to show yet again in football even club thought that Wanyama and Ince were pretty much done deals.

So can someone state what I said at the time was wrong ?

carl
we bid 10 million after celtic had accepted 12 million from southampton.Our bid was never officially accepted by celtic.
malky was the person who did not want to pay the extra 2 million