Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:39 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:45 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:57 pm
Forever Blue wrote:As everyone knows Sam was in London for a few days and extended it to coming to Cardiff, Sam originally intended to only be in the Uk for a few days, but extended it to nearly a week as talks progressed successfully regarding the Langston Loan notes.
Another meeting is now planned later this month in London.
Things have started to get back on track again and hopefully this can finally be sorted before the season starts.
It has gone on and on and it needs to finally come to ahead for the good of Cardiff City.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:06 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:29 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:32 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:33 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:33 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:37 pm
Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:45 pm
Jinks wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Excellent post
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:50 pm
Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:55 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:59 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:02 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:07 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:11 pm
Damned Yank wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
it will be renegotiated again, probably multiple times, by then.
With no security Hammam's options are very limited. Better off using the money to build the club because there is not much risk in doing so.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:16 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
it will be renegotiated again, probably multiple times, by then.
With no security Hammam's options are very limited. Better off using the money to build the club because there is not much risk in doing so.
If theres no security on anything why offer him anything at all like in the past, makes no sence
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:20 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
it will be renegotiated again, probably multiple times, by then.
With no security Hammam's options are very limited. Better off using the money to build the club because there is not much risk in doing so.
If theres no security on anything why offer him anything at all like in the past, makes no sence
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:23 pm
Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:I'm with Tan on this: keep fobbing Hammam off until we've been in the prem a few seasons and built up a decent war chest.
That way we can spend the money on players instead to consolidate our position, instead of wasting it on Hammam.
Why would tan want to do that it will be over 36million quid owed by then in 2016 which is in a contract i believepay him off now and move on i say,
it will be renegotiated again, probably multiple times, by then.
With no security Hammam's options are very limited. Better off using the money to build the club because there is not much risk in doing so.
If theres no security on anything why offer him anything at all like in the past, makes no sence
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:23 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:25 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:37 pm
I'M SPARTACUS wrote:I don't think Sam has got any chance of getting the full amount back,tan holds all the aces in this game.
I think its been mentioned a few times that something along the lines of Sam being offered some sort of role at the club as part of an agreement which could be possible if they both see eye to eye.To the majority of fans this scenario would be totally unacceptable and rightly so after what's gone on but nothing surprise's me in football so this is a possibility.
Hopefully this Langston saga comes to an end soon and puts us all out our misery.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:49 pm
Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:51 pm
I'M SPARTACUS wrote:I don't think Sam has got any chance of getting the full amount back,tan holds all the aces in this game.
I think its been mentioned a few times that something along the lines of Sam being offered some sort of role at the club as part of an agreement which could be possible if they both see eye to eye.To the majority of fans this scenario would be totally unacceptable and rightly so after what's gone on but nothing surprise's me in football so this is a possibility.
Hopefully this Langston saga comes to an end soon and puts us all out our misery.
Sun Jul 14, 2013 5:45 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:I'M SPARTACUS wrote:I don't think Sam has got any chance of getting the full amount back,tan holds all the aces in this game.
I think its been mentioned a few times that something along the lines of Sam being offered some sort of role at the club as part of an agreement which could be possible if they both see eye to eye.To the majority of fans this scenario would be totally unacceptable and rightly so after what's gone on but nothing surprise's me in football so this is a possibility.
Hopefully this Langston saga comes to an end soon and puts us all out our misery.
And you think that Tan will consider that?
Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:15 pm
I'M SPARTACUS wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I'M SPARTACUS wrote:I don't think Sam has got any chance of getting the full amount back,tan holds all the aces in this game.
I think its been mentioned a few times that something along the lines of Sam being offered some sort of role at the club as part of an agreement which could be possible if they both see eye to eye.To the majority of fans this scenario would be totally unacceptable and rightly so after what's gone on but nothing surprise's me in football so this is a possibility.
Hopefully this Langston saga comes to an end soon and puts us all out our misery.
And you think that Tan will consider that?
No
Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:02 pm
Forever Blue wrote:As everyone except Carl knows Sam was in London for a few days and extended it to coming to Cardiff, Sam originally intended to only be in the Uk for a few days, but extended it to nearly a week as talks progressed successfully regarding the Langston Loan notes.
Another meeting is now planned later this month in London.
Things have started to get back on track again and hopefully this can finally be sorted before the season starts.
It has gone on and on and it needs to finally come to ahead for the good of Cardiff City.
Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:27 am
Bluebird1977 wrote:If theres no security on anything why offer him anything at all like in the past, makes no sence
Mon Jul 15, 2013 9:27 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Bluebird1977 wrote:If theres no security on anything why offer him anything at all like in the past, makes no sence
Not quite true. CCFC is now more or less a solvent company due to PL revenues with ambitions to float on a stock market in the Far East. True SH has no security against his loan but what he does have is a valid contract to be repaid anything from £15m to £30m+ by 2016 at the latest, but IMO the debt could arguably be payable now.
It is conceivable that SH could take the club (not Tan personally) to court over the debt and win. He then would have several options to recover his debt, a charge against the company property, bailiffs removing goods or even an attachment to earnings.
This action would also scupper any hope of floating on any stock market as it would be impossible to prepare an IPO with a High Court writ against the club.
Whatever people think of Sam/Langston personally or commercially it is in all our interests to deal with him and get this matter resolved amicably.