Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:46 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:54 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:55 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:57 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 8:58 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:04 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:06 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:08 am
Gavin wrote:I recently joined the supporters trust, the reason I did so is because I wanted to be part of a group that is able to put their opinions and suggestions directly to our club, they are a voice of a group of fans allegedly.
In the last couple of years social media and use of the internet has exploded and I often read when looking at WalesOnline or BBC articles references to our fans forum /message board where they take our opinions into serious consideration when then write articles, they want to be on side with the fans needless to say. This makes me think that old school supporters trusts may be becoming outdated.
This, coupled with what the trust is meant to represent has given me an idea, why don’t we form our own representative body? We are in fact calling ourselves a ‘fans forum’ well lets form just that, a representative group of people that could attend meetings and be a voice for our members.
The only problem of course is that opinions on the forum are far and wide, some are borderline extreme, to that end we would need a broad range of people of varied opinion to form the representatives that could of course be selected by our members. This way we could hopefully find some mutual ground in our discussions and set realistic targets.
Lets take our board to the next level and form a group of people to be our voice in meetings with the club and other bodies.
Anyway it’s only an idea and I’d be very interested to hear your opinions.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:09 am
Natman Blue wrote:For that to happen then all fan's opinions need to be welcome and fairly represented; which they're not. Another concern would be does this just provide a platform for some certain fans to give credeence to their own agendas and an avenue once again back into the club. Finally we already have a trust, if you are that way inclined then you need to use that rather than set up something in competition or contradiction to that
Sorry, but no thanks, in regards to this board I don't think a fair representation of fan's views would be given. The case in point is a perfect example; could you really see annis putting his own views to one side and representing those who are happy in red? People have already been banned (including myself on occasions) for voicing an opinion different to certain people on this forum. Also, one final thought; would joining the forum mean you lend your views to this or would you have to join something in addition?
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:10 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:14 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:15 am
Gavin wrote:I recently joined the supporters trust, the reason I did so is because I wanted to be part of a group that is able to put their opinions and suggestions directly to our club, they are a voice of a group of fans allegedly.
In the last couple of years social media and use of the internet has exploded and I often read when looking at WalesOnline or BBC articles references to our fans forum /message board where they take our opinions into serious consideration when then write articles, they want to be on side with the fans needless to say. This makes me think that old school supporters trusts may be becoming outdated.
This, coupled with what the trust is meant to represent has given me an idea, why don’t we form our own representative body? We are in fact calling ourselves a ‘fans forum’ well lets form just that, a representative group of people that could attend meetings and be a voice for our members.
The only problem of course is that opinions on the forum are far and wide, some are borderline extreme, to that end we would need a broad range of people of varied opinion to form the representatives that could of course be selected by our members. This way we could hopefully find some mutual ground in our discussions and set realistic targets.
Lets take our board to the next level and form a group of people to be our voice in meetings with the club and other bodies.
Anyway it’s only an idea and I’d be very interested to hear your opinions.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:16 am
Hoochie Coochie Blues wrote:Best to show some unity and utilise what we already have...otherwise we will just be a bunch of egotistical splinter groups.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:18 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:That's just it. There isn't "one opinion" on here. There are many, so to represent the fans views on here with a select few would be totally wrong.
It would just be representing those select person's views & not the forum as a whole.
The trust is a far more powerful way of getting a voice. Plus, if you don't like what they are representing, you can choose to leave them.
I think this would alienate a lot on the forum. This is a message board, that's all. It's not a committee/association.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 9:26 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:06 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:20 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:26 am
Forever Blue wrote:Yes I sort of agree with Gavin, This suggestion has nothing to do with the Rebrand, am I right Gavin?
Its about general issues that might happen, Carl is invited to all the meetings that our club has with fans, I get invited sometimes as long as I dont say what I really think![]()
Carl and say another 2 or 3 from this Forum could ask questions and put concerns etc across to Simon Lim, questions that have come from this forum.
Yes I am BLUE through and through, but this not not just about one issue, its surely about many issues that Gavin is talking about.
As to some saying they dont get their say on here, I despise the Red, but I always let fans say their opinions on it and if they support it and embrace, thats their choice, I dont agree with it, but that their belief, look at Gwyn he embraced it and said his piece time and time again and never stopped, so fans do get their say on here.
Name calling, sarcasm,ridiculing etc NO its not allowed.
Were never all going to agree on everything that is life.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:27 am
Gavin wrote:Your dead right Annis, this has nothing to do with the rebrand, the issue spreads opinion to greatly to be represented fairly by anyone, this would be far more general, surely we could agree on things a bit less controversial than the rebrand
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:30 am
Forever Blue wrote:Yes I sort of agree with Gavin, This suggestion has nothing to do with the Rebrand, am I right Gavin?
Its about general issues that might happen, Carl is invited to all the meetings that our club has with fans, I get invited sometimes as long as I dont say what I really think![]()
Carl and say another 2 or 3 from this Forum could ask questions and put concerns etc across to Simon Lim, questions that have come from this forum.
Yes I am BLUE through and through, but this not not just about one issue, its surely about many issues that Gavin is talking about.
As to some saying they dont get their say on here, I despise the Red, but I always let fans say their opinions on it and if they support it and embrace, thats their choice, I dont agree with it, but that their belief, look at Gwyn he embraced it and said his piece time and time again and never stopped, so fans do get their say on here.
Name calling, sarcasm,ridiculing etc NO its not allowed.
Were never all going to agree on everything that is life.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:36 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:40 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:45 am
redordead wrote:I think people on this forum are more than capable of discussing topics and giving our point of view to the board of directors.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:48 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:55 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:That's just it. There isn't "one opinion" on here. There are many, so to represent the fans views on here with a select few would be totally wrong.
It would just be representing those select person's views & not the forum as a whole.
The trust is a far more powerful way of getting a voice. Plus, if you don't like what they are representing, you can choose to leave them.
I think this would alienate a lot on the forum. This is a message board, that's all. It's not a committee/association.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 10:59 am
steve davies wrote:redordead wrote:I think people on this forum are more than capable of discussing topics and giving our point of view to the board of directors.
why do people think that a messageboard forum will ever be given the chance to debate club issue's with the board of directors.
If the forum members had an amount of shares between them then perhaps thats a way forward but at this moment in time i only see people being paid lip service by tan and although he might be being seen to listen to some issues ultimately he is going to do what he wants regardless.
Sat Jun 08, 2013 11:00 am
castleblue wrote:In principal I think this is a very good idea and unless I'm wrong this board already has recognition from the Club as Carl attends regular meetings regarding away travel arrangements. Is it that big a step to ask the club for recognition as a fans representative body, I don't think so.
I understand concerns about voicing "All Opinions" but does anyone seriously believe that the Trust or Supporters Club actually represent the opinions of "All" of thier members. As some extreme opinions can be posted on this board I'm sure some fairly wild opinions can get expressed to both the Trust and Supporters Club.
Like both those organisations this forum would need to select people who can represent the reasonable views of the members and also raise questions on behalf on members who normally don't have the opportunity to ask.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sat Jun 08, 2013 11:08 am
Sat Jun 08, 2013 11:08 am
Gavin wrote:Your dead right Annis, this has nothing to do with the rebrand, the issue spreads opinion to greatly to be represented fairly by anyone, this would be far more general, surely we could agree on things a bit less controversial than the rebrand
Sat Jun 08, 2013 11:10 am
Gavin wrote:Your dead right Annis, this has nothing to do with the rebrand, the issue spreads opinion to greatly to be represented fairly by anyone, this would be far more general, surely we could agree on things a bit less controversial than the rebrand