Mon May 13, 2013 10:41 am
Mon May 13, 2013 10:48 am
Mon May 13, 2013 10:53 am
Mon May 13, 2013 10:54 am
Gavin wrote:So thank Tan for putting us in this position, then try to oust him immediately after? That's what your suggesting??
Mon May 13, 2013 11:01 am
Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
Mon May 13, 2013 11:14 am
Blue_Always wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
I did also, the above proposition plays to their logic and reason, looking at this purely in terms of securing the clubs existence, we have never had a better oppurtunity to rid ourselves of langston and Tan.
Mon May 13, 2013 11:33 am
Bakedalasker wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
I did also, the above proposition plays to their logic and reason, looking at this purely in terms of securing the clubs existence, we have never had a better oppurtunity to rid ourselves of langston and Tan.
Basically they have allowed Tan to payroll the promotion push.
Mon May 13, 2013 12:07 pm
Mon May 13, 2013 1:23 pm
pembroke allan wrote:To answer your question? Who is going to invest £100m to buy city? That's what it would cost at this point to buy city!
Why would tan change is mind on colours when he's got us promotion in red! You come on here periodically with same anti tan rhetoric why? Your ideas are ill thought out and impracticable!
Mon May 13, 2013 1:38 pm
Blue_Always wrote:pembroke allan wrote:To answer your question? Who is going to invest £100m to buy city? That's what it would cost at this point to buy city!
Why would tan change is mind on colours when he's got us promotion in red! You come on here periodically with same anti tan rhetoric why? Your ideas are ill thought out and impracticable!
We are more liikely to be bought now than at the end of a relegated season(would you agree?). Therefore, those who claim to have the clubs survival at heart, would want it all sorted now instead of talking about whether we'll sign danny welbeck.
I post on here periodically because i often travel abroad on business. However My views on Tan are not periodic, Infact Everytime i visit my father's 'bluebird' gravestone in Ely cemetary I'm reminded just how disrespectful to the people of south wales Tan has been.
Mon May 13, 2013 1:42 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
Mon May 13, 2013 1:42 pm
Mon May 13, 2013 1:48 pm
Wayne S wrote:The scenario is a good one but the real time facts are flawed.
Sell up, yes, but who will buy? The motivation to purchase is not there especially when you factor in the GUARANTEED return VT is already looking at.
For VT to consider a sale he would be looking for a return that takes into account the debt to him, this years Premier League monies and, at the least, the parachute payments on returning the the Championship.
There is still a lot of work to do before the club is seen as a good asset to take on and even then it will be foreign money coming in again. The club has outgrown local investment.
Mon May 13, 2013 1:50 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Blue_Always wrote:pembroke allan wrote:To answer your question? Who is going to invest £100m to buy city? That's what it would cost at this point to buy city!
Why would tan change is mind on colours when he's got us promotion in red! You come on here periodically with same anti tan rhetoric why? Your ideas are ill thought out and impracticable!
We are more liikely to be bought now than at the end of a relegated season(would you agree?). Therefore, those who claim to have the clubs survival at heart, would want it all sorted now instead of talking about whether we'll sign danny welbeck.
I post on here periodically because i often travel abroad on business. However My views on Tan are not periodic, Infact Everytime i visit my father's 'bluebird' gravestone in Ely cemetary I'm reminded just how disrespectful to the people of south wales Tan has been.
What if,what if,what if.All verbal bollocks.
Mon May 13, 2013 2:42 pm
Blue_Always wrote:
Judging from your post you think we'll liquidate and cease to exist, is that correct?
Mon May 13, 2013 2:52 pm
Wayne S wrote:Blue_Always wrote:
Judging from your post you think we'll liquidate and cease to exist, is that correct?
No it is not.
I am all for pressing for VT to step aside if it means we get blue back. I just do not think there is a buyer out there that could meet the current asking price.
Mon May 13, 2013 3:15 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Wayne S wrote:Blue_Always wrote:
Judging from your post you think we'll liquidate and cease to exist, is that correct?
No it is not.
I am all for pressing for VT to step aside if it means we get blue back. I just do not think there is a buyer out there that could meet the current asking price.
Ah fair enough, What is the current asking price?
Mon May 13, 2013 3:23 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Mon May 13, 2013 3:30 pm
Sven Ghali wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Spurious reasons? Slap in the face? Mickey Mouse? Shake Tan into selling? Powerful position?
Feck mate, you need to take a reality check and (more importantly) start appreciating the 99% good that Tan has achieved for Cardiff City FC...unless, of course YOU could have done better with YOUR money![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon May 13, 2013 3:47 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
Do you think the HMRC Court cases and those winding up orders were made up as part of the plan.
Mon May 13, 2013 3:49 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Spurious reasons? Slap in the face? Mickey Mouse? Shake Tan into selling? Powerful position?
Feck mate, you need to take a reality check and (more importantly) start appreciating the 99% good that Tan has achieved for Cardiff City FC...unless, of course YOU could have done better with YOUR money![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Slap in the face? " - Rebranding a 100 year old identity is a slap in the face for many bluebirds i meet.
"Mickey Mouse? " - Mimmicking man utd's home strip with a beer matt badge is mickey mouse. is it not?
"Shake Tan into selling? Powerful position?" - We were told Tan must not be spooked into taking off, Now the seasons over a show off fan unity would shake him, no?
Tan has ruined how Many fans identify with CCFC, The man did everything with as little class as possible it seems
Mon May 13, 2013 5:01 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
Do you think the HMRC Court cases and those winding up orders were made up as part of the plan.
No I don't think the winding up orders were made up. However what is to say the courts would have agreed the winding up order. What happened if someone else came along. What about the Malaysians pulling out then, would the like of PMG who had a high interest in the club just let it happen losing everything? I doubt it.
Mon May 13, 2013 5:34 pm
Mon May 13, 2013 5:35 pm
aj1927 wrote:Another regenerated poster.
Mon May 13, 2013 5:49 pm
Blue_Always wrote:aj1927 wrote:Another regenerated poster.
Not me, only ever used this name here, migrated from the other board, classier fan on here
Mon May 13, 2013 6:43 pm
Gavin wrote:So thank Tan for putting us in this position, then try to oust him immediately after? That's what your suggesting??
Mon May 13, 2013 9:37 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Sven Ghali wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Spurious reasons? Slap in the face? Mickey Mouse? Shake Tan into selling? Powerful position?
Feck mate, you need to take a reality check and (more importantly) start appreciating the 99% good that Tan has achieved for Cardiff City FC...unless, of course YOU could have done better with YOUR money![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Slap in the face? " - Rebranding a 100 year old identity is a slap in the face for many bluebirds i meet.
"Mickey Mouse? " - Mimmicking man utd's home strip with a beer matt badge is mickey mouse. is it not?
"Shake Tan into selling? Powerful position?" - We were told Tan must not be spooked into taking off, Now the seasons over a show off fan unity would shake him, no?
Tan has ruined how Many fans identify with CCFC, The man did everything with as little class as possible it seems
Mon May 13, 2013 9:42 pm
Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Mon May 13, 2013 10:16 pm
Bluetwin wrote:Blue_Always wrote:Here's a question...
Many reluctant and not so reluctant reds used the spurious reason of impending liquidation when accepting a mickey mouse rebrand and less face it no other club has recieved the slap in the face like Tan licked us with. ...... So with the the clubs existence purely in their (our) hearts, would now be the best time to rock the boat and shake Tan into selling or reverting back to a more respectful dialogue between him and the community? If Tan puts us up for sale now, We are less likely to liquidate now than if we were relegated at the end of next season. If you genuinely fear for the institutions future, should we now act, As fans we haven't been in such a powerful position.
Shake Tan into selling? In a powerful position? Really?
Exactly how do you propose to do this? If you no longer want to watch games then don't.
Mon May 13, 2013 10:25 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:I've always believed the liquidation factor was a tactic used by certain club employees to secure their own interests.
Do you think the HMRC Court cases and those winding up orders were made up as part of the plan.
No I don't think the winding up orders were made up. However what is to say the courts would have agreed the winding up order. What happened if someone else came along. What about the Malaysians pulling out then, would the like of PMG who had a high interest in the club just let it happen losing everything? I doubt it.
pmg was a secured creditor who has made millions from the deal, and would have been one of the few to have not lost much if anything from admin or liquidation.
As for other investors stepping in, yeh Ok keep trying to convince yourself, I'm sure there were loads of Billionaire mugs waiting in the wings, it's just they missed out the time before when we were in a bad position, but one ten times better than the one we were in this time.