Sat May 11, 2013 9:27 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:28 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:34 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:35 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:35 am
bspark wrote:We would have lost 9 points without Frazier Campbell. Does that make us a one man team?
Sat May 11, 2013 9:37 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:38 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:I hate stats like this - it's not as if Swansea would have only played 10 men if they didnt have Michu.. Someone else may well have scored instead of him.
Boring.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:41 am
rhyswales wrote:bspark wrote:We would have lost 9 points without Frazier Campbell. Does that make us a one man team?
We didnt have him all season tho ?
Sat May 11, 2013 9:41 am
rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I hate stats like this - it's not as if Swansea would have only played 10 men if they didnt have Michu.. Someone else may well have scored instead of him.
Boring.
So Mitchu's brain is in another players body ? Hes an intelligent player not many players have his brain and movement.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:43 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:44 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:45 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:I hate stats like this - it's not as if Swansea would have only played 10 men if they didnt have Michu.. Someone else may well have scored instead of him.
Boring.
So Mitchu's brain is in another players body ? Hes an intelligent player not many players have his brain and movement.
Are you really that stupid?![]()
Had Swansea not played Michu, there would be another player is his position. You are assuming that throughout the season, that player would not score or assist in any way at all. That's ridiculous.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:47 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:49 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:50 am
Sat May 11, 2013 9:50 am
rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
They could have signed velikonja instead and them he wouldn of played at all ? or scored.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:53 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
They could have signed velikonja instead and them he wouldn of played at all ? or scored.
Seriously, I'd stop posting now. You're making yourself look very silly.
Sat May 11, 2013 9:58 am
rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
They could have signed velikonja instead and them he wouldn of played at all ? or scored.
Seriously, I'd stop posting now. You're making yourself look very silly.
But you must be able to see what im saying i get where your coming from but its just a little fun stat. CHILL![]()
Sat May 11, 2013 10:03 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
They could have signed velikonja instead and them he wouldn of played at all ? or scored.
Seriously, I'd stop posting now. You're making yourself look very silly.
Sat May 11, 2013 10:05 am
rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:rhyswales wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:No you aren't. Your stat is assuming that his replacement in the team would not have scored any goals or assisted in any way at all.
Which is pointless.
They could have signed velikonja instead and them he wouldn of played at all ? or scored.
Seriously, I'd stop posting now. You're making yourself look very silly.
But you must be able to see what im saying i get where your coming from but its just a little fun stat. CHILL![]()
Sat May 11, 2013 10:20 am
Sat May 11, 2013 11:34 am
Sat May 11, 2013 11:44 am
rhyswales wrote:Swansea would have lost 9 points and the teams around them would have gained a few points .... one man team ?
Sat May 11, 2013 11:48 am
Sat May 11, 2013 12:01 pm
Sat May 11, 2013 12:02 pm
Sat May 11, 2013 12:07 pm
Sat May 11, 2013 6:17 pm
Sat May 11, 2013 7:17 pm
Sat May 11, 2013 7:21 pm