Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:35 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:38 pm
tangledupinblue wrote:http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/index.php?t=msg&th=354357&start=0&rid=0
Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:42 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 7:52 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:10 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:14 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:parts of that are true, but they started cos of the we'll always be blue chant!
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:17 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:parts of that are true, but they started cos of the we'll always be blue chant!
Who's they tell us more shep ??? because i know gwyn whos mentioned in this thread thats linked hates this red lark like most other city fans but he sees it as whats best for the club to run and not his personal view of what he would like to see happen as for the others you speak of i dont know them at all really bar they eat nails for a living but i dont believe anything of this post tbh it seems a touch odd, thats the net for you.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:19 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:parts of that are true, but they started cos of the we'll always be blue chant!
Who's they tell us more shep ??? because i know gwyn whos mentioned in this thread thats linked hates this red lark like most other city fans but he sees it as whats best for the club to run and not his personal view of what he would like to see happen as for the others you speak of i dont know them at all really bar they eat nails for a living but i dont believe anything of this post tbh it seems a touch odd, thats the net for you.
honestly dont know tbh, big bald chap with a few others! had to be held back! think someone was filming it around me!
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:21 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:22 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:parts of that are true, but they started cos of the we'll always be blue chant!
Who's they tell us more shep ??? because i know gwyn whos mentioned in this thread thats linked hates this red lark like most other city fans but he sees it as whats best for the club to run and not his personal view of what he would like to see happen as for the others you speak of i dont know them at all really bar they eat nails for a living but i dont believe anything of this post tbh it seems a touch odd, thats the net for you.
honestly dont know tbh, big bald chap with a few others! had to be held back! think someone was filming it around me!
I see, i never went as i was supposed to be working tonight, so you seen a big bald chap and you say its true so what did you see then
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:23 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Some mates I know who went said it was more to do with flares going off. Not rebrand related.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:23 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:Some mates I know who went said it was more to do with flares going off. Not rebrand related.
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:25 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:Some mates I know who went said it was more to do with flares going off. Not rebrand related.
definately rebrand related sadly..
Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:25 pm
CalShepCCFC wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:CalShepCCFC wrote:parts of that are true, but they started cos of the we'll always be blue chant!
Who's they tell us more shep ??? because i know gwyn whos mentioned in this thread thats linked hates this red lark like most other city fans but he sees it as whats best for the club to run and not his personal view of what he would like to see happen as for the others you speak of i dont know them at all really bar they eat nails for a living but i dont believe anything of this post tbh it seems a touch odd, thats the net for you.
honestly dont know tbh, big bald chap with a few others! had to be held back! think someone was filming it around me!
I see, i never went as i was supposed to be working tonight, so you seen a big bald chap and you say its true so what did you see then
basically, 'we'll always be blue chant' started, they started looking round and telling people 'we're f*cking red, look at the shirts'... chants started again, started having a go again, some guy behind me said something to the big bald one, and then he kicked off! few grabs of the shirts, might of been a punch or two thrown in!
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:00 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:10 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:15 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:18 pm
Sat Mar 30, 2013 10:37 pm
Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:32 am
Sun Mar 31, 2013 8:08 am
Double G wrote:I was right next to it. It was to do with rebrand. Some scruffy long haired young boy and macnamara fell out over it, macs mate threw a punch, a friend of mine grabbed hold of the scruffy kid and pulled him away and told him too go away or he is gonna get hurt. Only did it for the scruffy boys own safety. The boy waa pissed and tried going back for more but it all fizzled out.
Sun Mar 31, 2013 6:51 pm
Double G wrote:I was right next to it. It was to do with rebrand. Some scruffy long haired young boy and macnamara fell out over it, macs mate threw a punch, a friend of mine grabbed hold of the scruffy kid and pulled him away and told him too go away or he is gonna get hurt. Only did it for the scruffy boys own safety. The boy waa pissed and tried going back for more but it all fizzled out.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 8:12 am
bluearmy1990 wrote:Double G wrote:I was right next to it. It was to do with rebrand. Some scruffy long haired young boy and macnamara fell out over it, macs mate threw a punch, a friend of mine grabbed hold of the scruffy kid and pulled him away and told him too go away or he is gonna get hurt. Only did it for the scruffy boys own safety. The boy waa pissed and tried going back for more but it all fizzled out.
how can you call anyone scruffy when your wearing that buzzing top?
Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:00 am
Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:31 am
Paxman wrote:This him shep?
He should be banned.
Mon Apr 01, 2013 10:39 am
steve davies wrote:Paxman wrote:This him shep?
He should be banned.
who the f**k are you to put peoples photos on a public forum based on speculation you jack idiot.
no repercussions for you though because your hiding behind one of a dozen usernames on this board
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:37 am
steve davies wrote:Paxman wrote:This him shep?
He should be banned.
who the f**k are you to put peoples photos on a public forum based on speculation you jack idiot.
no repercussions for you though because your hiding behind one of a dozen usernames on this board
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:46 am
Paxman wrote:steve davies wrote:Paxman wrote:This him shep?
He should be banned.
who the f**k are you to put peoples photos on a public forum based on speculation you jack idiot.
no repercussions for you though because your hiding behind one of a dozen usernames on this board
I am paxman.
What's the difference in someone naming someone and someone posting a pic of them? He id a convictednhooligan and was the one in the muni that uttered the words "ill bury any fan who protests" and have seen him pick on people for nothing before. There are tens of witnesses who say he was picking in people yesterday for supporting the blue including picking on a 14 year old boy. He should be banned. It's time we started making a stand against these valley idiots.
Repercussions, don't make me laugh
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:46 am
Paxman wrote:steve davies wrote:Paxman wrote:This him shep?
He should be banned.
who the f**k are you to put peoples photos on a public forum based on speculation you jack idiot.
no repercussions for you though because your hiding behind one of a dozen usernames on this board
I am paxman.
What's the difference in someone naming someone and someone posting a pic of them? He id a convictednhooligan and was the one in the muni that uttered the words "ill bury any fan who protests" and have seen him pick on people for nothing before. There are tens of witnesses who say he was picking in people yesterday for supporting the blue including picking on a 14 year old boy. He should be banned. It's time we started making a stand against these valley idiots.
Repercussions, don't make me laugh
Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:46 am