Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:24 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:28 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:29 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:29 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:For 500k? I think it was a steal
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:30 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:31 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:Tell me a better striker, realistically, we could have got for around £750,000? A striker with experience at Championship and some at Premiership level?
Cant wait to hear this one.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:32 pm
THE CARDIFF LAD wrote:Better strikers out there we could get? Like who?
By the sounds of it we have got Campbell for under £1 million, the price tag is very attractive and indeed a very good deal. The reported wage packet, I'm not too sure about to be honest.
I think Campbell would be a hit in the Premiership to be honest and if we get promotion he could well hit double figures next season IMO.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:36 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:38 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:38 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:38 pm
Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Tell me a better striker, realistically, we could have got for around £750,000? A striker with experience at Championship and some at Premiership level?
Cant wait to hear this one.
Vaz Te..? DJ Campbell..? shall I go on..? and anyway are we saying that this is the type of transfer fee the club can only afford now when we are top of the league and in need of strengthening..?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:42 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Tell me a better striker, realistically, we could have got for around £750,000? A striker with experience at Championship and some at Premiership level?
Cant wait to hear this one.
Vaz Te..? DJ Campbell..? shall I go on..? and anyway are we saying that this is the type of transfer fee the club can only afford now when we are top of the league and in need of strengthening..?
For that type of fee? Vaz Te probably wouldn't come to us for a start. As for DJ Campbell, hes a cheating rat and I wouldn't want him here anyway not to mention the fact of his age. Buying him would be ridiculous. We already have an experienced striker in Helguson, we need a Maynard type player who can get in behind the defence. I would rather us not loan..apart from Ramsey loanee''s seem to not put the effort in or are just quite happy to pick up a wage.. Samuel, Bywater, etc. ring a bell?
No we're not but just because we're top doesn't mean we should spend money stupidly and for the sake of it.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:45 pm
Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Tell me a better striker, realistically, we could have got for around £750,000? A striker with experience at Championship and some at Premiership level?
Cant wait to hear this one.
Vaz Te..? DJ Campbell..? shall I go on..? and anyway are we saying that this is the type of transfer fee the club can only afford now when we are top of the league and in need of strengthening..?
For that type of fee? Vaz Te probably wouldn't come to us for a start. As for DJ Campbell, hes a cheating rat and I wouldn't want him here anyway not to mention the fact of his age. Buying him would be ridiculous. We already have an experienced striker in Helguson, we need a Maynard type player who can get in behind the defence. I would rather us not loan..apart from Ramsey loanee''s seem to not put the effort in or are just quite happy to pick up a wage.. Samuel, Bywater, etc. ring a bell?
No we're not but just because we're top doesn't mean we should spend money stupidly and for the sake of it.
The types of players mentioned clubs would just want them off their wage bill hense probably the reason why he only cost 500k as a transfer fee. So in fact your comment about Vaz Te is complete nonsense as you don't actually know that for sure.
Also where have I even mentioned about Loans..?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:46 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:47 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:47 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:48 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:48 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:49 pm
All Black Everything. wrote:Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Angry Man wrote:All Black Everything. wrote:Tell me a better striker, realistically, we could have got for around £750,000? A striker with experience at Championship and some at Premiership level?
Cant wait to hear this one.
Vaz Te..? DJ Campbell..? shall I go on..? and anyway are we saying that this is the type of transfer fee the club can only afford now when we are top of the league and in need of strengthening..?
For that type of fee? Vaz Te probably wouldn't come to us for a start. As for DJ Campbell, hes a cheating rat and I wouldn't want him here anyway not to mention the fact of his age. Buying him would be ridiculous. We already have an experienced striker in Helguson, we need a Maynard type player who can get in behind the defence. I would rather us not loan..apart from Ramsey loanee''s seem to not put the effort in or are just quite happy to pick up a wage.. Samuel, Bywater, etc. ring a bell?
No we're not but just because we're top doesn't mean we should spend money stupidly and for the sake of it.
The types of players mentioned clubs would just want them off their wage bill hense probably the reason why he only cost 500k as a transfer fee. So in fact your comment about Vaz Te is complete nonsense as you don't actually know that for sure.
Also where have I even mentioned about Loans..?
I didn't say you had mentioned loans. No, the reason Fraizer is cheap is because his contract runs out soon. That is a fact but you didn't know that by saying 'hence probably the reason'. Vaz Te wouldn't come here. At West Ham, has played 7 games, will get a chance and be used in games West Ham use a different approach and would cost well over £1m.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:50 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:51 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:This from the guy who wanted to sign Brett Pittman![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:53 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
As I say I hope Im wrong but for some reason I don't think I am. Whats wrong with having a different opinion as you on a public forum..?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:53 pm
Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:55 pm
Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:This from the guy who wanted to sign Brett Pittman![]()
![]()
![]()
free transfer and better than Rudy
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:56 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
As I say I hope Im wrong but for some reason I don't think I am. Whats wrong with having a different opinion as you on a public forum..?
Nothing wrong with it at all..........I just disagree with you.......strongly!
His record at Sunderland is poor I agree but where he has started games he has scored goals. Forwards are made up of 50% confidence and I believe Malky can give him that confiddence to go and bag double figures before the end of the season.
2006–2009 → Manchester United 2 (0)
2006–2007 → Royal Antwerp (loan) 33 (21) Goal every 1.57
2007–2008 → Hull City (loan) 34 (15) Goal every 2.26
2008–2009 → Tottenham Hotspur (loan) 10 (1) ......I'm sure you can work this one out![]()
2009– Sunderland 58 (6) Goal every 9.6 games
Total to date = Goal every 3.1 games but due to his injuries I think this is actually very respectable! My only concern is not the goals he will bring but his ability to keep fit, I would imagine the medical will pick that up.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:57 pm
Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:57 pm
Mario Polotelli wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:This from the guy who wanted to sign Brett Pittman![]()
![]()
![]()
free transfer and better than Rudy
being better than Rudy means nothing. You're probably better than him and youre a mess.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:57 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:58 pm
Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Dont know why and hope Im wrong but there are better strikers out there for the money that was 'supposed' to have been paid or are paying should I say.
That from someone who is obviously an authority on all things football![]()
Jesus man for a transfer under £1M and his salary included of about the same per year I would suspect, it's great business!
As I say I hope Im wrong but for some reason I don't think I am. Whats wrong with having a different opinion as you on a public forum..?
Nothing wrong with it at all..........I just disagree with you.......strongly!
His record at Sunderland is poor I agree but where he has started games he has scored goals. Forwards are made up of 50% confidence and I believe Malky can give him that confiddence to go and bag double figures before the end of the season.
2006–2009 → Manchester United 2 (0)
2006–2007 → Royal Antwerp (loan) 33 (21) Goal every 1.57
2007–2008 → Hull City (loan) 34 (15) Goal every 2.26
2008–2009 → Tottenham Hotspur (loan) 10 (1) ......I'm sure you can work this one out![]()
2009– Sunderland 58 (6) Goal every 9.6 games
Total to date = Goal every 3.1 games but due to his injuries I think this is actually very respectable! My only concern is not the goals he will bring but his ability to keep fit, I would imagine the medical will pick that up.
listen I'm not talking about before his Sunderland days because they are 3 years ago alone!!!! 1 goal in every 9.6 games and that alone says something
Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:58 pm
Dange wrote:Angry Man wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Vaz Te is getting games for West Ham you complete berk so its not like West Ham are desperate to get him off the wage bill.
what like FA Cup games you mean
He's played in 7 league games and 2 league cup games...........oh and NO FA Cup games scoring 1 league goal