' New vincent tan interview '

Jim white interviews Vincent tan on sky sports news 5PM tomorrow night .(MONDAY)

First weve heard from him in a while should be interesting . He says in the interview he now owns 98 % of the club

He owns 98% of a shell
Good luck with that Mr brilliant business man
NOT

He says that 80-90% of fans are behind him

Maths was never his strong point

He says that 80-90% of fans are behind him

Maths was never his strong point

No but a high number are still going, still paying their money which is probably the same thing to a businessman like Tan.

Or there might be something in what he's saying-better than the guesswork going on here anyway.I was hoping some of the ITK's would tell us.

Interview held from his boat in Malaysia wearing his 'lucky red' shite.
They've just shown a snippet of the full interview to be held later.

Finally some word from Tan himself.

Finally some word from Tan himself.

he will only talk spin as normal with his percentage figures which NOBODY believes but him and no doubt there will be the old walking away bit if hes not wanted speech , f**k him

Finally some word from Tan himself.

he will only talk spin as normal with his percentage figures which NOBODY believes but him and no doubt there will be the old walking away bit if hes not wanted speech , f**k him

hmmm, I wonder what he is going to threaten his customers with now? Anyone see a pattern?? Just as it looked like we were to turn a corner with a new manager and an upturn in points (4 from 6)

he will say.

club are for sale at the right price (which he has always said)
Tell us some truths about Malky
Why he sacked OGS
His plans for the future
He will consider mix the kit blue and red

BUT this will be stirred up by SkySportsNews, they will show only what they want to show.

He's going to play the hard done by card. How we are ungrateful and as such have kept him from attending this season.

How all he ever wanted was the best for Cardiff and putting in £150m has kept us from admin.

We should worship him and let him ride rough shot.........blah blah blah

here you go!


http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/9 ... ppointment

here you go!


http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/9 ... ppointment

30 seconds, that´s all?

here you go!


http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/9 ... ppointment

30 seconds, that´s all?

Its a jim white interview it will be a lot more than that . that is just a taster by the looks of it

I can see where this interview is going to go. He's gonna play the victim of how none of us like him, his rebranding, and more importantly he'll remind us how much we owe him and we must grease our anus's and bend over to Lord Tan.

When in reality, the £150m debt is largely his doing, We didnt hire Solksjaer who failed misrabley and cost us alot of money, we didnt hire Slade who more than likely wont take us up, which by all accounts according to Tan will send us into a Financial Crisis. We didnt decide we prefer Red for 'marketting reason' only for no one to buy the shirts, again costing the club alot of money. We didnt ask for the stadium to be extended with stupid red seats, the stadium was fine the size it was for a club our size.

All of this was Tans choice, yet were the ones who must thank him for wasting so much of his cash on bad decisions and pay him back? Business dont work like that, the buck all comes down to Tan, he wanted to make the choices so he must foot the bill, not saddle us with even more debts than when he first started. Say we did get promoted, stayed in the Prem for a few seasons and payed back everything Tan is apparently owed, would he put the profits back in the club? Would he feck.. But its ok to Kill our club then go on TV bleating how no one likes him, we want him out, and give his money back and hes gone, thats whats coming tonite i can see it happening

Finally some word from Tan himself.

he will only talk spin as normal with his percentage figures which NOBODY believes but him and no doubt there will be the old walking away bit if hes not wanted speech , f**k him

Yeah could well be, I just think it's good he's deciding to say something.

He'll give a very structured interview where he will just say the ins and outs with the reasons behind them then a lot of our moronic fan base will take something out of context just to have a reason to give him more grief and abuse when they most likely can't accept that he was right to sack Malky and bring out in the open the reasons when he was protecting the club.

Jim white interviews Vincent tan on sky sports news 5PM tomorrow night .(MONDAY)

First weve heard from him in a while should be interesting . He says in the interview he now owns 98 % of the club

Has Michael Isaac now sold VT his shareholding then , as MI previously was the 2nd biggest shareholder with about 11% of the shares in issue.?

I can see where this interview is going to go. He's gonna play the victim of how none of us like him, his rebranding, and more importantly he'll remind us how much we owe him and we must grease our anus's and bend over to Lord Tan.

When in reality, the £150m debt is largely his doing, We didnt hire Solksjaer who failed misrabley and cost us alot of money, we didnt hire Slade who more than likely wont take us up, which by all accounts according to Tan will send us into a Financial Crisis. We didnt decide we prefer Red for 'marketting reason' only for no one to buy the shirts, again costing the club alot of money. We didnt ask for the stadium to be extended with stupid red seats, the stadium was fine the size it was for a club our size.

All of this was Tans choice, yet were the ones who must thank him for wasting so much of his cash on bad decisions and pay him back? Business dont work like that, the buck all comes down to Tan, he wanted to make the choices so he must foot the bill, not saddle us with even more debts than when he first started. Say we did get promoted, stayed in the Prem for a few seasons and payed back everything Tan is apparently owed, would he put the profits back in the club? Would he feck.. But its ok to Kill our club then go on TV bleating how no one likes him, we want him out, and give his money back and hes gone, thats whats coming tonite i can see it happening

THIS

I can see where this interview is going to go. He's gonna play the victim of how none of us like him, his rebranding, and more importantly he'll remind us how much we owe him and we must grease our anus's and bend over to Lord Tan.

When in reality, the £150m debt is largely his doing, We didnt hire Solksjaer who failed misrabley and cost us alot of money, we didnt hire Slade who more than likely wont take us up, which by all accounts according to Tan will send us into a Financial Crisis. We didnt decide we prefer Red for 'marketting reason' only for no one to buy the shirts, again costing the club alot of money. We didnt ask for the stadium to be extended with stupid red seats, the stadium was fine the size it was for a club our size.

All of this was Tans choice, yet were the ones who must thank him for wasting so much of his cash on bad decisions and pay him back? Business dont work like that, the buck all comes down to Tan, he wanted to make the choices so he must foot the bill, not saddle us with even more debts than when he first started. Say we did get promoted, stayed in the Prem for a few seasons and payed back everything Tan is apparently owed, would he put the profits back in the club? Would he feck.. But its ok to Kill our club then go on TV bleating how no one likes him, we want him out, and give his money back and hes gone, thats whats coming tonite i can see it happening

But without Tan we would have been liquidated.

Also we were selling out on a weekly basis in the premiership so if we had stayed there (like Hull and Palace) then the increase would have been very much needed.

The debt is to one man rather than to a variety of creditors incl HMRC.