Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:29 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:35 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:40 pm
griff105 wrote:Which one will be the first to respond to this thread. My bet is on jack69 or whatever the twats name is.......
Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:41 pm
griff105 wrote:Which one will be the first to respond to this thread. My bet is on jack69 or whatever the twats name is.......
Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:48 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:48 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:griff105 wrote:Which one will be the first to respond to this thread. My bet is on jack69 or whatever the twats name is.......
64jack is sound. Sl69 is the volatile dysfunctional one. Think he might be banned though.
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:02 pm
64JACK wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
WOW! You managed to completely quote the article incorrectly (or were you trying to twist it?)! What he is actually saying is that they are looking at overseas sponsorship through commercial activities in response to rumours that they were looking for investors. There will be no sale of shares to any outside investor.
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:04 pm
64JACK wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
WOW! You managed to completely quote the article incorrectly (or were you trying to twist it?)! What he is actually saying is that they are looking at overseas sponsorship through commercial activities in response to rumours that they were looking for investors. There will be no sale of shares to any outside investor.
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:07 pm
Bluebina wrote:griff105 wrote:Which one will be the first to respond to this thread. My bet is on jack69 or whatever the twats name is.......
Retardcant69 isn't it ??
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:10 pm
griff105 wrote:Bluebina wrote:griff105 wrote:Which one will be the first to respond to this thread. My bet is on jack69 or whatever the twats name is.......
Retardcant69 isn't it ??
Mate not been rude but cant reply to your pm, i cant send any for some reason! I havent upgraded to that package maybe
All good over here. Speak soon
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:23 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:41 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:64JACK wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
WOW! You managed to completely quote the article incorrectly (or were you trying to twist it?)! What he is actually saying is that they are looking at overseas sponsorship through commercial activities in response to rumours that they were looking for investors. There will be no sale of shares to any outside investor.
Wow! I managed to misquote two words! They were "MILES BEHIND". Can you show me (apart from the capital letters) how I achieved this feat of incompetence?
Huw Jenkins has just Dmitted that the club is behind others. How am I twisting this?
Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:43 pm
griff105 wrote:64JACK wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
WOW! You managed to completely quote the article incorrectly (or were you trying to twist it?)! What he is actually saying is that they are looking at overseas sponsorship through commercial activities in response to rumours that they were looking for investors. There will be no sale of shares to any outside investor.
Fuckin knew it. Shame bet365 didnt take bets on obsessives.
Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:23 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:32 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:14 pm
Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:28 pm
64JACK wrote:griff105 wrote:64JACK wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
WOW! You managed to completely quote the article incorrectly (or were you trying to twist it?)! What he is actually saying is that they are looking at overseas sponsorship through commercial activities in response to rumours that they were looking for investors. There will be no sale of shares to any outside investor.
Fuckin knew it. Shame bet365 didnt take bets on obsessives.
Ye I know what you mean, I would have put my house on you being the first too reply to a Swansea related thread! And sure enough!
Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:29 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
Wed Oct 01, 2014 11:10 pm
Thu Oct 02, 2014 6:25 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:Wow! What an admission. Huw has been quoted in the BBC website that financially, they are "miles behind" their competitors. He admits he would like investment from outside. Is this the "Swansea Way"?
The article goes on to state the obvious, that they survive on TV money and transfers.
Made my day!
Why would it make your day roathie??
Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:43 am
Woodville Willie wrote:Now then, can we get some proper pro-Cardiff threads going rather than sniping at the neighbours?
Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:48 am
TheRow wrote:Almost every club in the Premier League survives on tv money and transfers, the only two that would continue without it are Man City and Chelsea. Not sure who made the comment about Huws cash cow, but how would his salary change due to investment? He is not the clubs owner remember. Im all for jack bashing but only when its warranted. He is not looking for a rich buyer at all, he is looking for commercial opportunities so sponsorship etc. lets get our house in order before making spurious non stories into something they are not.
Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:52 am
Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:22 am
Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:33 am
Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:28 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Jesus Christ.
Stick to your own advice Woodville...
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=148162&p=1570826#p1570826Woodville Willie wrote:Now then, can we get some proper pro-Cardiff threads going rather than sniping at the neighbours?
Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:01 pm
TheRow wrote:Almost every club in the Premier League survives on tv money and transfers, the only two that would continue without it are Man City and Chelsea. Not sure who made the comment about Huws cash cow, but how would his salary change due to investment? He is not the clubs owner remember. Im all for jack bashing but only when its warranted. He is not looking for a rich buyer at all, he is looking for commercial opportunities so sponsorship etc. lets get our house in order before making spurious non stories into something they are not.
Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:09 pm
Woodville Willie wrote:
Cut the blasphemy please, there's a good chap.
No.
Nicely researched, chwarae teg. 10/10 for effort.
To clarify, this thread is not anti-Cardiff and happened to be the lead story on SCFC's webpage for BBC Sport. They a geographically the closest "big" club to Cardiff so it is relevant. There are plenty of comments already so it must be of interest.
If the thread is offensive, feel free to remove it but you can't do the same with the BBC site!
Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:29 pm
. What about the hypocrisy of being a mod when you in the past have been a multi, TownhillMagic? You even based your name on a well-known Swansea fan so don't lecture me "pot, kettle, black"!Barry Chuckle wrote:Woodville Willie wrote:
Cut the blasphemy please, there's a good chap.
No. I'd rather be a hypocrite than intentionally go out to offend!
Nicely researched, chwarae teg. 10/10 for effort.
To clarify, this thread is not anti-Cardiff and happened to be the lead story on SCFC's webpage for BBC Sport. They a geographically the closest "big" club to Cardiff so it is relevant. There are plenty of comments already so it must be of interest.
If the thread is offensive, feel free to remove it but you can't do the same with the BBC site!
Who has mentioned anything about Anti-Cardiff threads?! All I quoted was stop sniping at the neighbours and make some Cardiff threads... [color=#FF4000]No you didn't! You quoted the whole sentence which specifically mentions pro-Cardiff threads. You have often accused me of an inability to read, so take your own advice!
Don't know what is more embarrassing, this thread or the hypocrisy. [/color]
Thu Oct 02, 2014 7:10 pm