Sat Dec 01, 2012 6:37 am
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:34 am
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:34 am
Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:08 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Good piece and no coincidence the 3 "ever presents" were all Jones signings.
Doesnt get the credit he deserves for making us as competetive as we were especially when he had to sell his best players.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:08 am
Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:47 am
Mario Polotelli wrote:Good piece and no coincidence the 3 "ever presents" were all Jones signings.
Doesnt get the credit he deserves for making us as competetive as we were especially when he had to sell his best players.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:04 am
Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:41 am
Coco wrote:Mario Polotelli wrote:Good piece and no coincidence the 3 "ever presents" were all Jones signings.
Doesnt get the credit he deserves for making us as competetive as we were especially when he had to sell his best players.
Top post - Jones played his part in our progress . He'll get a welcome from me !
Sat Dec 01, 2012 12:04 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:11 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:32 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 4:53 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:35 pm
carlccfc wrote:One of the problems DJ refers to is that he has not received the settlement on his contract, he and his wife have been offered shares as a settlement.
I find his comment, "The day I left, it wasn't my team, it wasn't my club", very interesting.
I am assuming that DJ is referring to the loan players that we had in his final season and being they were short term, that it was not his choice to go down that route but the choice of the Malaysians and the board.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:34 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:00 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:17 pm
norfolkblue wrote:Before you condemn DJ too harshly please think of the following. He was an employee of the club and had a 12 month rolling contract. In normal business this contract is only terminated if the employer decides that the employee has broken the terms of his contract. They then give him notice. If not they send him on gardening leave.
I worked for a major UK retail chain, on a six month rolling contract. I did not in any way shape or form break my contract of employment.
They decided because of the economic climate in 2008 they would break my contract and the contracts of my team illegally. They ask you to sign a compromise agreement that forbids you from revealing the terms of you severance agreement, but they pay you far more than you would ever be awarded in an employment tribunal. Our contracts resulted in us being made redundant, they gave us six months pay, sent us home on six months "gardening leave" this meant that we could not seek employment for six months. I took legal advice, was told that this would be classed as *restraint of trade" and went to work for another retail company immediately. I said to my previous employer "see you in court" and nothing happened.
DJ is possibly in the same place, love him or hate him, if he had a twelve month rolling contract they need to have paid him and let him move on. Anything else is unfair, unethical and possibly illegal.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 10:35 pm
taffyapple wrote:norfolkblue wrote:Before you condemn DJ too harshly please think of the following. He was an employee of the club and had a 12 month rolling contract. In normal business this contract is only terminated if the employer decides that the employee has broken the terms of his contract. They then give him notice. If not they send him on gardening leave.
I worked for a major UK retail chain, on a six month rolling contract. I did not in any way shape or form break my contract of employment.
They decided because of the economic climate in 2008 they would break my contract and the contracts of my team illegally. They ask you to sign a compromise agreement that forbids you from revealing the terms of you severance agreement, but they pay you far more than you would ever be awarded in an employment tribunal. Our contracts resulted in us being made redundant, they gave us six months pay, sent us home on six months "gardening leave" this meant that we could not seek employment for six months. I took legal advice, was told that this would be classed as *restraint of trade" and went to work for another retail company immediately. I said to my previous employer "see you in court" and nothing happened.
DJ is possibly in the same place, love him or hate him, if he had a twelve month rolling contract they need to have paid him and let him move on. Anything else is unfair, unethical and possibly illegal.
Also unfair, is Dave Jones sitting there with Ridsdale saying "Go on then, i'll take 800k a year"
Then sure as eggs is eggs, off he goes complaining he's got no money for players. The man
had no morals, off down the Golf Club whilst the players go on the piss. He's such a bighead
and egotistic tw*t "When I used to go to places like Man Utd and Arsenal" blah blah blah
Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:06 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:10 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:34 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:46 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:18 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:20 am
troobloo3339 wrote:how do you know its the club when did you become a director or work for the club angry man why dont you shove you unfounded words up yout a..e
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:26 am
Angry Man wrote:Im not a fan of DJ and haven't been for many years but a contract was agreed and should be upheld whatever your feelings about him.
It is a worry that the club seem to be unwilling to do the right thing in coming to an agreement with both Sam and DJ and the result of that is to spend more on legal costs.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:27 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:Angry Man wrote:Im not a fan of DJ and haven't been for many years but a contract was agreed and should be upheld whatever your feelings about him.
It is a worry that the club seem to be unwilling to do the right thing in coming to an agreement with both Sam and DJ and the result of that is to spend more on legal costs.
Again, agreed. If you were owed money by your ex employers - you'd chase it wouldn't you?
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:30 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 11:48 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:22 pm
Angry Man wrote:Im not a fan of DJ and haven't been for many years but a contract was agreed and should be upheld whatever your feelings about him.
It is a worry that the club seem to be unwilling to do the right thing in coming to an agreement with both Sam and DJ and the result of that is to spend more on legal costs.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:30 pm
taffyapple wrote:Angry Man wrote:Im not a fan of DJ and haven't been for many years but a contract was agreed and should be upheld whatever your feelings about him.
It is a worry that the club seem to be unwilling to do the right thing in coming to an agreement with both Sam and DJ and the result of that is to spend more on legal costs.
Not a worry to you though.
Seeing as you dont support the Club anyway