Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:33 pm
Merlin wrote:Danny Nightingale is now a free man. Reduced to 12 months and suspended.
Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:38 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:taffyapple wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:Papa Smurf wrote:JONNY012697 wrote:corky wrote:http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/secure-the-release-of-an-unfairly-jailed-war-hero
I think this is a cause worth our support.
its nice to see they havent mentioned the weapon was still live (as far as I know since Dunblane school massacre, owning a weapon like this is illegal), also they found 300 rounds of live ammunition with it.
Now if I was caught with that I would have an automatic 5 year prison sentence. An 18 month military detention is very soft and he should count himself lucky.
SAS soldier or not you are not allowed to break the law and if you do you should be punished.
Take away war hero in the headlines and people would be asking some serious questions.
The law, like you is an ass!
You're a very, very pathetic little, little man.
I do pity you. tut! Tut! Tut!
why what have I said that is untrue?
what do you think would happen to you if you were caught with a handgun and 300 rounds of ammunition.
if this was a black kid in London we wouldnt be having this conversation.
Military personnel are not outside the law, Im not, your not. The law has to stand.
He probably wont lose his job when he leaves Colchester, every effort will be made to house his family in the area, if they cant they will offer financial assistance for travel.
This guy is luckier than he thinks.
What a ridiculous comparison
How can you compare a case where these boxes had remained unopened, he was a serving
soldier, and had been given the gun as a gift, boxes packed in his absence.
to a 'black kid in London'
its a fair comparison, like it or not
if a kid (ill leave the black out lets be politically correct) had a handgun in his possession with 300 rounds of ammunition, we wouldnt be asking how it got there we would be more concerned with why hes got it and he would receive a minimum 5 year sentence and automatically assume it was for criminal activity.
you can see this with Ricardo Mckenzie, serving soldier with weapons brought home as war trophies, similar to this SAS soldier except Mckenzie is serving 10 years sentenced in August 2012, because why else would you have weapons other than for criminal activity.
So what makes this SAS soldier different?
You cant differentiate between soldier and civilian, otherwise Mckenzie wouldnt be in prison.
Are you saying SAS soldiers are more professional than regular servicemen? or is the SAS above the law in this country?
The man broke the law but instead of getting 5 years plus he was given 18 months, with a reasonable chance that he will still have his job when he leaves Colchester. Considering he committed one of the more serious crimes in this country, 18 months is as good a slap on the wrist as your ever going to get.
Lets face it though you will never agree with me, so lets just leave it at that because I really dont want to be arguing with you for hours. Sign the petition if you want to. I wont be the law is absolute, there are no exceptions, he admitted his guilt he will and has received a punishment.
Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:21 pm
inthebowls wrote:corky wrote:http://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/secure-the-release-of-an-unfairly-jailed-war-hero
I think this is a cause worth our support.
done
Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:29 pm
Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:40 pm
Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:04 pm
Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:36 pm
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Being in the armed forces does not give you immunity from the law. They'd say exactly the same thing themselves.
As per usual, I agree with you.
Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:46 pm
Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:05 pm
Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:18 pm
OhhhGa wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:OhhhGa wrote:Being in the armed forces does not give you immunity from the law. They'd say exactly the same thing themselves.
As per usual, I agree with you.
I'm an agreeable chap
How did the application go? Did they manage to find the bloody thing?
Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:48 am
Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:59 am
[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]JONNY012697 wrote:I wont sign it anyway?
You were talking absolute f*cking bollocks about the 'black kids in London'
Scenario One is of a decorated serviceman, awarded the weapon by grateful Iraqis
and his oppos packed it away for him in his belongings. Shouldnt be there. No argument.
But there were extenuating circumstances, obviously. The point being that it was unlikely
he had that gun for anything else other than a keepsake.
Black kid, sink estate London, found with a gun in his house. Do behave.
White kid, sink Estate Liverpool, found with a gun in house. Same.