Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:39 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:42 pm
Feeling Blue wrote:Does any one else think it might be a good idea to try this tonight with team?
Marshal
Connally
Hudson
Nugent
Noone
Gunnarson
Mutch
Kim
Whitts
Helgason
Mason/Bellamy
I know we never use 3 at the back but due to our injuries should we not give it ago and with mutch and gunnarson in defensive midfield roles I think this formation could work. What do you guys think?
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:42 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:45 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:45 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:What a ridiculous formation! To be honest we coud never go 3 at the back as our centre halfs arent quick enough and 3 at the back rarely works
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:46 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:48 pm
thomasblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What a ridiculous formation! To be honest we coud never go 3 at the back as our centre halfs arent quick enough and 3 at the back rarely works
barcelona ?? real madrid ?? man city ?? bayern munich ?? theyve all played 352 this year worked for them ! really it is 5 at the back because youve got 2 defensive mids sitting in front of a back 3 protecting them and breaking up play allowing 5 attacking players to run wild . it does and can work if used properly
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:57 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:thomasblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What a ridiculous formation! To be honest we coud never go 3 at the back as our centre halfs arent quick enough and 3 at the back rarely works
barcelona ?? real madrid ?? man city ?? bayern munich ?? theyve all played 352 this year worked for them ! really it is 5 at the back because youve got 2 defensive mids sitting in front of a back 3 protecting them and breaking up play allowing 5 attacking players to run wild . it does and can work if used properly
Didnt work for Man City and Barcelona have struggled when playing it aswell. To use 3 at the back you need pacy centre hafs and be able to keep hold of pocession which we dont.
As someone said those teams are much much better than us
Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:59 pm
thomasblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:thomasblue wrote:CjBluebird17 wrote:What a ridiculous formation! To be honest we coud never go 3 at the back as our centre halfs arent quick enough and 3 at the back rarely works
barcelona ?? real madrid ?? man city ?? bayern munich ?? theyve all played 352 this year worked for them ! really it is 5 at the back because youve got 2 defensive mids sitting in front of a back 3 protecting them and breaking up play allowing 5 attacking players to run wild . it does and can work if used properly
Didnt work for Man City and Barcelona have struggled when playing it aswell. To use 3 at the back you need pacy centre hafs and be able to keep hold of pocession which we dont.
As someone said those teams are much much better than us
true but those teams are also playing top teams not derby , i do see what u mean though . Would be intresting to see our full attacking force on the pitch at the same time gunnarsson at left back for me tonight
Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:05 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:14 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 2:49 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:52 pm
Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:07 pm
Feeling Blue wrote:Come on guys we all know we are useless defending away so we might as well go all out attack
Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:05 pm