Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:13 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:56 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:13 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:57 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:01 am
blooobirds wrote:What is worrying, unlike the previous managers, is that Coleman has taken over a side that was playing fantastic football and full of confidence.
Why change the tactics?
Why bring in dinosaurs as his backroom staff?
Why the f**k did the FAW let Dutch Ray walk?
Everything Gary Speed and his backroom staff had built has been destroyed. Shame on you Coleman
Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:02 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:47 am
Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:21 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:41 pm
NJ73 wrote:Coleman didn't take control for the Costa Rica game.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:53 pm
Kanester wrote:NJ73 wrote:Coleman didn't take control for the Costa Rica game.
Please don't tell me you are defending Coleman? He should never have had the job, Get rid now and send that ginger prick packing with him.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:03 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:35 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:53 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:11 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:29 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:29 pm
wez 1927 wrote:get the jack c**t out now bring harry rednapp or another high profile ,man motivator as manager the players are there spedd proved that
Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:37 pm
maccydee wrote:wez 1927 wrote:get the jack c**t out now bring harry rednapp or another high profile ,man motivator as manager the players are there spedd proved that
Did he though? We performed very badly then won a few games against poor opposition. Granted the 4 nil win against Norway was pretty good but it was a friendly. He got us up in the rankings but they are a lottery as has been shown by England's continued presence at the top.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:11 pm
wez 1927 wrote:get the jack c**t out now bring harry rednapp or another high profile ,man motivator as manager the players are there spedd proved that
Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:16 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:18 pm
I Bleed Blue wrote:Didn't we lose to Australia not Austria under Speed?
Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:57 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:01 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:41 pm
Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:57 pm
NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:06 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Coleman is a very poor manager who has achieved absolutely bugger all. He should never have been given the job in the 1st place. Brian Flynn, Osian Roberts and the Dutch fella Raimond should have been the managerial team. They had the respect of the players and could have turned the awful tragedy of Gary Speeds death into a positive by getting the players to win qualification for Speedo and his family. In 4 games Coleman has totally fucked up the team spirit and if he had an ounce of decency he would give his resignation.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:28 pm
NJ73 wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Coleman is a very poor manager who has achieved absolutely bugger all. He should never have been given the job in the 1st place. Brian Flynn, Osian Roberts and the Dutch fella Raimond should have been the managerial team. They had the respect of the players and could have turned the awful tragedy of Gary Speeds death into a positive by getting the players to win qualification for Speedo and his family. In 4 games Coleman has totally fucked up the team spirit and if he had an ounce of decency he would give his resignation.
I understand why you would come to that opinion but I disagree. We are where we are and I think it would be counter-productive to get rid of Coleman now.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:36 pm
NJ73 wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Coleman is a very poor manager who has achieved absolutely bugger all. He should never have been given the job in the 1st place. Brian Flynn, Osian Roberts and the Dutch fella Raimond should have been the managerial team. They had the respect of the players and could have turned the awful tragedy of Gary Speeds death into a positive by getting the players to win qualification for Speedo and his family. In 4 games Coleman has totally fucked up the team spirit and if he had an ounce of decency he would give his resignation.
I understand why you would come to that opinion but I disagree. We are where we are and I think it would be counter-productive to get rid of Coleman now.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:55 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Coleman is a very poor manager who has achieved absolutely bugger all. He should never have been given the job in the 1st place. Brian Flynn, Osian Roberts and the Dutch fella Raimond should have been the managerial team. They had the respect of the players and could have turned the awful tragedy of Gary Speeds death into a positive by getting the players to win qualification for Speedo and his family. In 4 games Coleman has totally fucked up the team spirit and if he had an ounce of decency he would give his resignation.
I understand why you would come to that opinion but I disagree. We are where we are and I think it would be counter-productive to get rid of Coleman now.
It is hard to conclude anything other than you are defending the useless herbert because he is a mustachio'd jack who I note was guest speaker at the jack supporter do in London a couple of weeks back.
Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:00 pm
Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:04 pm
NJ73 wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:NJ73 wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:NJ73 wrote:Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:Nj can you give me a reason why the welsh f.a. Should stick with coleman and co?
Because a knee jerk reaction to a poor start is not what is needed given the whole situation.
Now I'm certainly not saying that Coleman will turn out to be the best man for the job, but as I've said previously, he took over in the most difficult circumstances possible and while people say he inherited a team of top form playing well. But that is only a part of the picture as the reality is he took over a group of young men traumatised from losing their mentor in such unexpected and tragic circumstances.
Just look at how the Speed situation has affected Craig Bellamy who made himself unavailable for these two crucial world cup games.
I honestly think that there was no one who would have been able to lift the players over the period of time that has passed.
Therefore, in my opinion, this campaign was always going to be a right off due to these circumstances and Coleman should be given the full campaign to try and lift the squad and turn it around. To sack him after a poor start while the squad is clearly still suffering the massive hangover from the loss of Speed would be wrong as I believe what is needed now is some continuity and stability.
I know this won't be a popular view on here though.
Coleman is a very poor manager who has achieved absolutely bugger all. He should never have been given the job in the 1st place. Brian Flynn, Osian Roberts and the Dutch fella Raimond should have been the managerial team. They had the respect of the players and could have turned the awful tragedy of Gary Speeds death into a positive by getting the players to win qualification for Speedo and his family. In 4 games Coleman has totally fucked up the team spirit and if he had an ounce of decency he would give his resignation.
I understand why you would come to that opinion but I disagree. We are where we are and I think it would be counter-productive to get rid of Coleman now.
It is hard to conclude anything other than you are defending the useless herbert because he is a mustachio'd jack who I note was guest speaker at the jack supporter do in London a couple of weeks back.
I'm able to form an opinion regardless of where someone is from. My view would be the same if it were a Cardiffian in the post.
I doubt however many on here would be so strongly against the postholder if that were the case.