LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:33 pm
Isit true he's been offered to us for 200 k? 
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:36 pm
Thats 200K more than i would give. A free may be, on a reduced salary.
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:43 pm
He may have been offered to us but the club would be mad to do a deal when we can have him for free in 2 weeks when they go under.
Notwithstanding this, I don't even think he's good enough.
Notwithstanding this, I don't even think he's good enough.
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:44 pm
WE HAVE TO BE SETTING OUR SIGHTS HIGHER THAN HIM
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:44 pm
Not needed...we have a surplus if midfielders
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:57 pm
sorry but he's well past it and needs to spend more time watching his horses and settle for lower league football!
Harsh but fair!
Harsh but fair!
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:57 pm
Whitts, Kim, Aron, Conway, Mutch, Kiss, Cowie are all better players IMO.
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:01 pm
I'd rather spend the money on Eddie Oshodi.
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 5:07 pm
Surely he is available on a free from Pompey?
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:39 pm
We need more pace in our team and he has not got it
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:42 pm
Not needed. Simple. Will only hinder the progress of Mason, Harris, Mutch, Ralls
Re: LIAM LAWRENCE
Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:57 pm
he s available for free they just want him off the wage bill